lithiated hydrazone 3 with methyl cinnamate followed by
alkaline hydrolysis to an “unstable” ketoacid 1a, which was
not purified. However, in our hands this reaction failed
completely. Probably because of the unusually stable nature
of the lithiated hydrazone 3, the reverse Michael reaction
prevents obtaining the addition product. Successful Michael
addition of 3 was achieved by employing activated alkyli-
denemalonate esters 4a1,2-e1,2 as Michael acceptors at -78
°C to give diastereomer mixtures of (E)-hydrazones 5a1,2-
e1,2 in 58-84% yields (Table 1).9 To avoid the reverse
comparison of the HPLC retention times on a chiral column
1
and the H and 19F NMR spectra of (3R)-5a1 and (3S)-5a1
with those of the products 5b1,2-e1,2. Interestingly, for the
products from arylmethylenemalonates 4a1,2 and 4b1,2, the
stereoselectivities of the methyl esters 4a2 and 4b2 were better
than those of ethyl esters 4a1 and 4b1, whereas ethyl esters
4c1-e1 gave Michael products more stereoselectively than
methyl esters 4c2-e2 for alkylidenemalonates. Particularly,
the stereoselectivity of 3-anisyl ethyl ester 4b1 was reversed
to give preferentially (3S)-5b1. Except for the methyl
derivatives 5e1,2, the Michael products 5a1-d1 were separated
by simple SiO2 column chromatography.
The acidic hydrolysis of the isolated major ethyl esters
5a1-d1 was conducted by heating in formic acid in the
presence of sulfuric acid to give the desired enantiomerically
pure 3-substituted (+)-6,6,6-trifluoro-5-oxohexanoic acids
1a,c,d and (-)-acid 1b (Table 2) as stable forms.
Table 1. Asymmetric Michael Reaction of Lithiated
Hydrazone 3 with Alkylidenemalonates 4
Table 2. Preparation of Enatiomerically Pure 3-Substituted
6,6,6-Trifluoro-5-oxohexanoic Acids 1a-d
yield products ratio
substrate product
R
R1
(%)
(3R):(3S)a
yield
(%)
[R]16
D
(c 0.4, CHCl3)
product
R1
C6H5
R2
4a 1
4a 2
4b1
4b2
4c1
4c2
4d 1
4d 2
4e1
4e2
5a 1
5a 2
5b1
5b2
5c1
5c2
5d 1
5d 2
5e1
5e2
C6H5
C6H5
C2H5
CH3
75
77
64
70
77
75
84
58
80
83
79:21
92:8
(3R)-1a
(3S)-1b
(3R)-1c
(3R)-1d
H
92
90
97
97
+24.5
-18.4
+40.5
+35.4
4-CH3OC6H4 C2H5
4-CH3OC6H4 CH3
(CH3)2CH
(CH3)2CH
C4H9
38:62
83:17
74:26b
68:32b
68:32
61:39
72:28
56:44
H
4-CH3OC6H4
(CH3)2CH
C4H9
H
H
C2H5
CH3
C2H5
CH3
C2H5
CH3
C4H9
CH3
CH3
The dehydration reaction of chiral acids 1a-d with
ammonium carbonate under refluxing in toluene followed
by addition of a catalytic amount of p-toluenesulfonic acid
gave dihydropyridinones 6a-d in 74-80% yields, presum-
ably through the hemiaminal intermediates 7. An iodopropyl
group as a tether for the radical cyclization was attached by
deprotonation of enamide 6a-d with NaH in anhydrous
DMF followed by addition of an excess amount of 1,3-
diiodopropane at room temperature in 52-70% yields
(Scheme 1).
The reaction of triethylborane and a small amount of
oxygen is a promising route to generate an ethyl radical that
abstracts iodine from alkyl iodides to give another alkyl
radical at low temperature.11 After radical addition to a C-C
double bond, the generated alkyl radical is reduced by usually
trialkyltin hydrides. However, for environmental reasons, tris-
(trimethylsilyl)silane12 was employed as the radical chain
transfer reagent despite the lower reactivity compared to that
a The ratios of diastereomers were estimated by integrating the 19F NMR
signals of the crude reaction mixtures. b The formal configurations of these
products are (3S) and (3R), respectively.
Michael reaction during warming up, the reaction mixture
was quenched by addition of an ethereal solution of hydrogen
chloride at -78 °C. X-ray crystallography of the major
isomer of 3-phenyl product 5a2 revealed that the configu-
ration of the 3-position was R, similar to the results of the
acetone SAMP-hydrazone and benzylidenemalonates re-
ported by Enders.10 The diastereomeric ratios and the
configurations of the other products were established by
(8) Instead of the reported procedure, SAMP-hydrazone 2 was prepared
by dehydrative heating in toluene with a Dean-Stark apparatus in the
presence of a catalytic amount of p-toluenesulfonic acid in 90% yield after
mixing trifluoroacetone and SAMP at room temperature for 2 days. Reed,
P. E.; Katzenellenbogen, J. A. J. Med. Chem. 1991, 34, 1162-1176.
(9) All new compounds were characterized by spectroscopic and
elemental analyses.
(11) Fujita, K.; Nakamura, T.; Yorimitsu, H.; Oshima, K. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2001, 123, 3137-3138.
(12) Ikeda, M.; Hamada, M.; Yamashita, T.; Matsui, K.; Sato, T.;
Ishibashi, H. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1999, 1949-1956.
(10) Enders, D.; Demir, A. S.; Rendenbach, B. E. M. Chem. Ber. 1987,
120, 1731-1735.
1572
Org. Lett., Vol. 4, No. 9, 2002