C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
contrast to reactions of 1, however, anti-7 is formed as the
predominant isomer.9
certainsbut not allscases the more easily accessible ligand 14 can
be sufficient. As an example, addition of Me2Zn to 1 is promoted
by 14 (identical conditions to those in Table 1) to afford 2b in
96% ee and 75% isolated yield (82% syn). However, in contrast to
ligand 3, the corresponding addition to 12 proceeds only to e25%
conversion when 14 is employed (after 24 h; 82% ee). Studies aimed
at delineation of factors that determine the identity of the optimal
catalysts in this class of asymmetric transformations are in progress.
The catalytic asymmetric process can be effected on medium-
ring electrophiles. A representative example, involving the seven-
membered nitroalkene 8, is depicted in Scheme 2. The reaction
proceeds as smoothly as the cases involving substrates 1 and 6.
However, unlike the smaller-ring systems, the same workup
procedure (aqueous NH4Cl) leads to the exclusive formation of the
ketone product in 93% ee and 42% isolated yield (>98% conv;
low yield partly due to volatility). As the reactions in Scheme 2
further illustrate (1f10 and 11), a similar Nef reaction can be
carried out in situ with six-membered ring conjugate addition
products, without significant loss of optical purity, but only when
workup is changed to the addition of a 20% aqueous solution of
H2SO4.10
Development of additional catalytic asymmetric C-C bond
forming reactions promoted by amino acid-based ligands and their
application to enantioselective synthesis is also underway.
Acknowledgment. This research was supported by the NIH
(GM-47480)andSchering-Plough(GraduateFellowshiptoC.A.L.-C.).
Supporting Information Available: Experimental procedures and
spectral and analytical data for all substrates and reaction products
(PDF). This material is available free of charge via the Internet at
Scheme 2. Catalytic Enantioselective Synthesis of Cyclic Ketones
References
(1) (a) Degrado, S. J.; Mizutani, H.; Hoveyda, A. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001,
123, 755-756. (b) Mizutani, H.; Degrado, S. J.; Hoveyda, A. H. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 779-781.
(2) Luchaco-Cullis, C. A.; Mizutani, H.; Murphy, K. E.; Hoveyda, A. H.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 1456-1460.
(3) For a recent review on asymmetric conjugate additions, see: Krause, N.;
Hoffmann-Ro¨der, A. Synthesis 2001, 171-196.
(4) (a) Hayashi, T.; Senda, T.; Ogasawara, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122,
10716-10717. (b) Hayashi, T. Synlett 2001, 879-887.
(5) (a) Sewald, N.; Wendisch, V. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1998, 9, 1341-
1344. (b) Versleijen, J. P. G.; van Leusen, A. M.; Feringa, B. L.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 5803-5806. (c) Alexakis, A.; Benhaim, C.
Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 2579-2581. (d) Alexakis, A.; Rosset, S.; Allamand,
J.; March, S.; Guillen, F.; Benhaim, C. Synlett 2001, 1375-1378. (e)
Alexakis, A.; Benhaim, C.; Rosset, S.; Humam, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2002, 124, 5262-5263. For related stoichiometric processes, see: (f)
Schafer, H.; Seebach, D. Tetrahedron 1995, 51, 2305-2324. For Mg-
catalyzed asymmetric additions of 1,3-dicarbonyls to acyclic nitroalkenes,
see: (g) Ji, J.; Barnes, D. M.; Zhang, J.; King, S. A.; Wittenberger, S. J.;
Morton, H. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 10215-10216.
(6) For representative enantioselective reactions (in addition to refs 1 and 2),
promoted by amino acid-based chiral metal complexes, see: (a) Nitta,
H.; Yu, D.; Kudo, M.; Mori, A.; Inoue, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114,
7969-7975. (b) Cole, B. M.; Shimizu, K. D.; Krueger, C. A.; Harrity, J.
P. A.; Snapper, M. L.; Hoveyda, A. H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1996,
35, 1668-1671. (c) Krueger, C. A.; Kuntz, K. W.; Dzierba, C. D.;
Wirschun, W. G.; Gleason, J. D.; Snapper, M. L.; Hoveyda, A. H. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 4284-4285. (d) Gilbertson, S. R.; Collibee, S. E.;
Agarkov, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 6522-6523. (e) Porter, J. R.;
Traverse, J. F.; Hoveyda, A. H.; Snapper, M. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001,
123, 984-985. (f) Porter, J. R.; Traverse, J. F.; Hoveyda, A. H.; Snapper,
M. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 10409-10410. (g) Deng, H.; Isler,
M. P.; Snapper, M. L.; Hoveyda, A. H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41,
1009-1012.
a Isolated yield (volatile product). b GLC yield (volatile products; decane
used as standard).
Macrocyclic nitroalkenes readily undergo Cu-catalyzed asym-
metric conjugate addition in the presence of phosphine 3. As
shown in eq 3, treatment of 12-membered ring 12 (>20:1 E:Z)
with 10 mol % of the chiral Cu complex and 3 equiv of Me2Zn,
followed by treatment with 10% H2SO4 for 1 h leads to the
formation of ketone 13 in 96% ee and 86% yield.
(7) Absolute stereochemistry of products is based on optical rotations obtained
from ketones 9, 10, 11, and 13 in comparison with the reported values
(see the Supporting Information for details).
(8) The corresponding anti isomers are obtained with similar levels of
enantioselectivity. For a plausible rationale for the predominant formation
of the syn isomer, see ref 4 and references therein.
(9) A similar trend was observed in the study by Hayashi and co-workers
(see ref 4).
A final note regarding the identity of the chiral ligand should be
mentioned. Although our studies clearly indicate that bis(amino
acid) ligand 3 is the optimal choice for all the above substrates, in
(10) Control experiments indicate that the reduction in product enantiopurity
is due to adventitious isomerization upon in situ Nef reaction.
JA020605Q
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 124, NO. 28, 2002 8193