Full Paper
Surprisingly, after the same reaction time, carbamate 2b
gave solely amino alcohol 5b. This observation can be ex-
plained by a two-step mechanism that involves fast oxidative
insertion of PPh3 into the oxazetidine ring to produce inter-
mediate A and subsequent transformation of the latter into
The control experiments with acyclic tosylhydroxylamine deriv-
ative 64 (Figure 2b) produced no traces of anisoles, and there-
fore, confirmed that the ring-opening reactions with 2a were
strain-release driven. The reaction was successful with aryl and
heteroaryl compounds, such as derivatives of pyridines or thio-
phene (Figure 2a, 46–56). The notable exceptions were highly
electron-deficient organometallic derivatives that gave a very
low yield of the expected products; this was most likely to be
due to their reduced nucleophilicity (Figure 2c). Likewise, al-
kynes such as phenylacetylene or 4-methoxyphenylacetylene
were also inert. Oxazetidine 2a reacts readily with alkyl lithium
derivatives to afford the expected ring-opening products. We
did not elaborate the scope of this reaction any further be-
cause the above compounds containing an alkyl substituent
could be synthesized from the corresponding readily available
alcohols by alternative methods. Nevertheless, this type of re-
activity could be very useful in more complicated systems,
such as Trçger bases, in which the benzylic positions can be
lithiated in a straightforward fashion with sBuLi (Figure 2a, 58).
The exo-selective installation of an amino-terminated chain on
a Trçger base scaffold in high yield provided a very versatile
handle for its further functionalization.[20] In addition to carbon
nucleophiles, the lithium salt of diphenylamine also reacted
smoothly to afford the hydroxylamine derivative (see the Sup-
porting Information). The ring-opening reactions with alkenyl-
lithium reagents generated by lithium–halogen exchange or
direct lithiation proceeded smoothly to give vinyl ethers in
good yields (Figure 2a, 43–45).
In addition to halogen–lithium exchange, the organolithium
compounds obtained by directed ortho-lithiation were also
successfully applied in this reaction, as exemplified with sulfo-
namide-, amide-, and methoxy-directing groups (Figure 2a,
59–63). In this regard, the utilization of the rarely used hydrox-
ymethyl ortho-directing group in benzyl alcohols seemed to be
especially attractive because the corresponding products could
be potentially utilized in ring-closure reactions to obtain 1,4-
oxazepines III (Scheme 1, X=H). Thus, treating benzyl alcohol
71 with two equivalents of nBuLi in boiling hexane with the
subsequent addition of 2a afforded the ortho-functionalized
product in 58% yield (Scheme 3a). Despite the moderate yield,
this approach offers the advantage of using a very cheap start-
ing material and the possibility of simultaneously installing the
reactive tether for the ring-closing step. The corresponding
1,4-oxazepines were then obtained by an intramolecular Mitsu-
nobu reaction.[21] Moreover, the attachment of the substituent
on the benzylic position and ortho-lithiation can be performed
in a one-pot procedure, as demonstrated in the synthesis of
secondary and tertiary benzylic alcohols 75 and 77, starting
from aldehyde 74 and methyl benzoate 76, respectively
(Scheme 3a). It should be noted that, when lithiation is per-
formed on 2-bromobenzylic alcohols, no improvements in
yield are achieved relative to the directed ortho-metalation of
an alcohol. We found that, with the brominated starting mate-
rials, bromine/lithium exchange competed with the deprotona-
tion step, sometimes to as much as 40% for compound 78
(Scheme 3b). In case of the compound 80 (Scheme 3b), the
directed ortho-lithiation of a non-brominated substrate is not
aziridine and triphenylphosphine oxide via zwitterion
B
(Scheme 2a). Indeed, when the reaction with compound 2a
was quenched after 2 h, none of the starting material or amino
alcohol 5a were detected (see the Supporting Information),
which indicated full conversion to A (Scheme 2a). In the case
of compound 2b, the five-membered insertion product is too
unstable toward an aqueous workup and instead is directly hy-
drolyzed into the corresponding amino alcohol 5b.[17] On the
other hand, intermediate A formed from 2b does not react fur-
ther to give the corresponding aziridine; this is most likely to
be due to the unfavorable formation of a more basic nitrogen
anion in intermediate B. The reactivity profile of 1,2-oxazeti-
dine towards phosphorous nucleophiles is thus different from
that of Davis oxaziridine 1, for which the carbon atom is at-
tacked preferentially over oxygen to produce a four-membered
Wittig-type intermediate.[18] In another test reaction with SmI2,
the electron-acceptor properties of 1,2-oxazetidines were
probed. When one equivalent of the one-electron donor SmI2
was added to oxazetidine 2b, almost full conversion was ach-
ieved in a few minutes. The same reaction with sulfonyl deriva-
tive 2a required a longer time and larger amount of SmI2 (ca.
16 h) and gave the expected amino alcohol 5a as the main
product. Surprisingly, with carbamate 2b, no amino alcohol
was obtained, but instead the iodinated hydroxylamine deriva-
tive 6 was isolated. The formation of this product can be ra-
tionalized by assuming the activation of the oxazetidine ring
with Lewis acid SmI2 followed by intramolecular iodide attack
on the carbon atom (Scheme 2b).[19] In this case, only one
equivalent of SmI2 is sufficient for full conversion, as opposed
to two equivalents otherwise required to reduce the NÀO
bond. These findings provide a possibility for the future use of
carbamate-protected 1,2-oxazetidines in C-selective ring-open-
ing reactions with nucleophiles by using Lewis acid activators
with non-nucleophilic counterions (e.g., triflates). In contrast to
1, compounds 2a–c were not reactive toward sulfur nucleo-
philes, such as diphenyl sulfide.
Having confirmed the high reactivity of 1,2-oxazetidines
toward nucleophilic agents, we next examined the reaction of
2a with different aryl and alkenyl organometallic compounds
(Figure 2a). The N-sulfonyl-protected 1,2-oxazetidine 2a was
chosen as a model compound based on the very good com-
patibility of this protecting group with almost all types of orga-
nometallics. Gratifyingly, we observed very fast ring opening
through nucleophilic attack on the oxygen atom. The reac-
tions, in most cases, proceeded instantaneously at À788C. To
enhance the reactivity of the organometallic reagents, two
equivalents of N,N,N’,N’-tetramethylethylenediamine (TMEDA)
were used. High yields were obtained with a range of sub-
strates with no traces of product resulting from nucleophilic
attack on nitrogen. Both organolithium and magnesium deriva-
tives were active nucleophiles; however, if possible, Br/Li ex-
change by using tBuLi or nBuLi was applied for convenience.
Chem. Eur. J. 2015, 21, 1 – 9
3
ꢀ 2015 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
&
&
These are not the final page numbers! ÞÞ