A R T I C L E S
Koivula et al.
A covalent glycosyl-enzyme intermediate is formed and then
hydrolyzed with the acid catalyst now acting as a general base
for the deprotonation of an incoming water molecule. Cel7A is
such a retaining glycosidase.11,12 If, on the other hand, the
nucleophile is a water molecule, a single displacement occurs,
in which the water molecule is deprotonated by an enzyme
carboxylate group, acting as a general base. Because a water
molecule is placed between the reaction center and the enzyme
carboxylate group of inverting enzymes, the two catalytic
carboxyl and carboxylate groups tend to be further apart in
inverting enzymes.13 Cel6A and the other enzymes in family 6
are inverting glycosidases.11,12
The structure determination of the catalytic domains of both
T. reesei cellobiohydrolases has paved the way for detailed
studies of their catalytic machineries.4,7,8,14-18 In Cel6A, the
extended active site can accommodate six glucosyl units.17,18
The binding of four glucosyl units within the tunnel, corre-
sponding to the -2 to +2 sites, contributes to the transition-
state stabilization,4,19,20 while binding to the +4 site is apparently
only required for the action of Cel6A on crystalline substrates.15
The early structural studies of Cel6A revealed a network of
interacting residues apparently contributing to the formation of
the active site.4 Two aspartic acids, D221 and D175, were
identified as the residues closest to the scissile bond. The two
carboxyl/carboxylate groups of these residues are within hydrogen-
bonding distance of each other, and the carboxylate of D221
points to the glycosidic oxygen between sites -1 and +1. D175
also interacts with the hydroxyl group of Y169 and the
guanidino group of R174. Because of these interactions, it was
suggested that D175 is probably ionized, whereas D221 is
protonated, and thus able to act as the proton donor. D175 was
thought to ensure the correct protonation state of the catalytic
acid and also, possibly, to stabilize the charged reaction
transition state.4 Mutagenesis experiments and crystallographic
studies of complexes with non-hydrolyzable cello-oligosaccha-
rides indicate that steric clashes contribute to sugar ring
distortion from a chair conformation at the -1 subsite.18,20
Structural studies of these complexes and the closely related
Humicola insolens enzyme also indicate that one of the loops
defining the tunnel is capable of conformational changes.17,18
As a consequence of this conformational change, the interactions
of D175/D221 with Y169/R174 are broken, and the side chain
of S181 is pushed into the -1 site. A chain of two water
molecules then links the hydroxyl of S181 to the carboxylate
of D175, Figure 1. They are positioned 3.0 and 4.2 Å,
Figure 1. Binding of the substrate in the active-site tunnel of Cel6A. Some
of the key residues are labeled, and hydrogen bonds are indicated by dotted
lines. The figure shows the complex of the Y169F mutant with a non-
hydrolyzable cellotetraose derivative (methyl 4-S-â-cellobiosyl-4-thio-â-
cellobioside). Protein side chains are colored with carbons gold, nitrogens
blue, and oxygens red. Ligand carbons are colored gold, oxygens pink, and
the linking sulfur atom is yellow. Water molecules are colored green.
Portions of the main chain are also shown, color-ramped from red at the
N-terminus to blue at the C-terminus. The figure was created in O59 and
rendered with MOLRAY.59
respectively, from the anomeric carbon in the -1 site. Ring
distortion in the -1 site is not a consequence of this confor-
mational change.18 In the present study, we have used a
combination of site-directed mutagenesis, X-ray crystallography,
molecular mechanics calculations, and enzyme mechanistic
studies to elucidate the roles of the two key aspartyl residues,
D221 and D175, in the active site of Cel6A.
Methods
Enzyme Kinetics. Values of kcat and Km for hydrolysis of cellotriose,
cellotetraose, cellopentaose, and cellohexaose (Glc3 to Glc6) (Merck)
in 10 mM sodium acetate buffer, pH 5.0 at 27 °C, were determined by
HPLC (Waters Millipore) with RI detection as described earlier.14,21
The substrate concentrations were 400 µM for Glc3 and 2-250 µM
for Glc4-Glc6 for both mutants. The kinetic constants for the wt Cel6A
enzyme have been published earlier.20,21 The pH dependence of the
D175A mutant was determined at 27 °C using cellotetraose as substrate.
The cellotetraose concentration in the reaction mixture was 200 µM
(D175A), and the final enzyme concentration was 1.0-4.0 µM. The
following buffer systems were used: glycine-HCl (pH range 1.4-3.8),
sodium acetate (pH range 4.0-5.6), sodium phosphate (pH range 6.0-
8.0), glycine-NaOH (pH range 9.0-10.6); the concentrations of the
buffer solutions were 10 mM. In all of the measurements, samples were
taken at 8-10 different time points to obtain reliable values for the
initial rates. The kinetic constants were obtained from the initial
velocities of the reaction curves by a nonlinear regression data analysis
with the program Enzfit.22
(10) Koshland, D. E. Biol. ReV. 1953, 28, 416-436.
(11) Knowles, J. K. C.; Lehtovaara, P.; Murray, M.; Sinnott, M. L. J. Chem.
Soc., Chem. Commun. 1988, 1401-1402.
(12) Claeyssens, M.; Tomme, P.; Brewer, C. F.; Hehre, E. J. FEBS Lett. 1990,
263, 89-92.
(13) McCarter, J. D.; Withers, S. G. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 1994, 4, 885-92.
(14) Koivula, A.; Lappalainen, A.; Virtanen, S.; Ma¨ntyla¨, A. L.; Suominen, P.;
Teeri, T. T. Protein Expression Purif. 1996, 8, 391-400.
(15) Koivula, A.; Kinnari, T.; Harjunpaa, V.; Ruohonen, L.; Teleman, A.;
Drakenberg, T.; Rouvinen, J.; Jones, T. A.; Teeri, T. T. FEBS Lett. 1998,
429, 341-6.
Kinetics of Fluoride Ion Release. Fluoride ion liberation was
followed essentially as described in ref 23. The temperature (25°C)
was kept constant during measurements using a Haake temperature bath.
Data were collected via a serial interface with an IBM-compatible PC
using the software Hyperterminal for recording. Data were analyzed
using the PC software FigP. Before initial rates of hydrolysis of
R-cellobiosyl fluoride were measured, the contaminating â-anomer was
(16) Ståhlberg, J.; Divne, C.; Koivula, A.; Piens, K.; Claeyssens, M.; Teeri, T.
T.; Jones, T. A. J. Mol. Biol. 1996, 264, 337-49.
(17) Varrot, A.; Schulein, M.; Davies, G. J. Biochemistry 1999, 38, 8884-91.
(18) Zou, J.-y.; Kleywegt, G. J.; Ståhlberg, J.; Driguez, H.; Nerinckx, W.;
Claeyssens, M.; Koivula, A.; Teeri, T. T.; Jones, T. A. Structure 1999, 7,
1035-1045.
(19) Harjunpaa, V.; Teleman, A.; Koivula, A.; Ruohonen, L.; Teeri, T. T.;
Teleman, O.; Drakenberg, T. Eur. J. Biochem. 1996, 240, 584-91.
(20) Koivula, A.; Reinikainen, T.; Ruohonen, L.; Valkeajarvi, A.; Claeyssens,
M.; Teleman, O.; Kleywegt, G. J.; Szardenings, M.; Rouvinen, J.; Jones,
T. A.; Teeri, T. T. Protein Eng. 1996, 9, 691-9.
(21) Teleman, A.; Koivula, A.; Reinikainen, T.; Valkeajarvi, A.; Teeri, T. T.;
Drakenberg, T.; Teleman, O. Eur. J. Biochem. 1995, 231, 250-8.
(22) Marquart, D. W. J. Soc. Ind. Appl. Math. 1963, 11, 431-441.
(23) Konstantinidis, A.; Sinnott, M. L. Biochem. J. 1991, 279, 587-93.
9
10016 J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 124, NO. 34, 2002