M V Bach
et al.
300
.
.
R ( ) deprenyl HCl (Research Biochemicals International, Natick, MA, USA); NADP+ sodium salt
-
-
\
2
-
-
-
from yeast, d glucose 6 phosphate monosodium salt (G6P) and glucose 6 phosphate dehydrogenase
(G6PD) type XII from Tortula yeast (Sigma Chemical Co., St Louis, MO, USA); potassium carbonate
-
-
-
(K CO ), methanol (CH OH), n hexane, HPLC grade acetonitrile (CH CN), isopropanol, dichloro
#
$
$
$
methane (CH Cl ), diethyl ether, toluene (BDH, Toronto, Canada). All solvents were distilled before
use. The K CO solution used was a 25% w v aqueous solution. The bu er solution used in all
experiments was 100 mm, pH 7.4.
#
#
}
å
#
$
Synthesis of potential substrates of CYP2D6 and their metabolites
-
-
-
-
-
-
(
) N allylamphetamine (AA) and ( ) N,N diallylamphetamine (DAA). ( ) Amphetamine sulph
6
6
6
}
ate (500 mg; 2.71 mmol) was suspended in CH CN (3 ml) and basi ed with K CO solution (25% w v;
1.5 ml; 2.71 mmol). The CH CN solution was decanted into another ask. The residue of K SO was
washed with CH CN (2.5 ml 2). To the combined organic solution, allyl bromide (117.45 ll;
1.36 mmol) was added, followed by K CO solution (1.5 ml). The reaction mixture was left to stir at room
$
#
$
$
#
%
3
$
#
$
temperature for 1 h during which time samples of the reaction mixture were examined by tlc using 10%
CH OH in CH Cl as the developing solvent. When the absence of allyl bromide was indicated, the
$
#
#
reaction mixture was evaporated (rotatory evaporator) and the residue obtained was dissolved in water
3
(40 ml). This solution was basi ed with K CO solution (1.5 ml) and extracted with CH Cl (5 ml 3).
#
$
#
#
The combined extract was evaporated to dryness and the product was puri ed by silica gel column
-
chromatography, using 2% CH OH in CH Cl as eluting solvent. Two products were obtained: (
)
6
$
#
#
-
- -
N,N diallylamphetamine (DAA; 24.80 mg) eluted rst, followed by ( ) N allylamphetamine (AA;
112.20 mg). Both were liquids. Total yield was 67.4%. AA was converted to a salt by treating a solution
6
of it in diethyl ether with dry HCl gas, with cooling (solid CO in acetone). The melting point of AA.HCl
#
"
Ê
-
(recrystallized from ethyl acetate) was 168.5 169.5 C. H NMR (CDCl ) for AA, d: 7.22 7.17 (m, 5H,
±
±
$
Ph); 5.91 5.78 (m, 1H, allyl CH); 5.15 5.03 (m, 2H, terminal allyl CH ); 3.36 3.29 (m, 1H) and
3.24 3.16 (m, 1H) (allyl N CH ); 3.00 2.90 (m, 1H, N CH); 2.80 2.73 and 2.64 2.57 (two dd, 2H, J
±
±
±
#
-
-
±
±
±
±
gem
#
-
5 Hz; CH Ph); 1.07 1.05 (d, 3H, J 5 Hz, CH CH ).
±
5
# $
10 H , J
5
5
z
vic
The electrospray mass spectrum of AA was consistent with the proposed structure ( gure 2).
When this reaction was repeated using excess allyl bromide (four equivalents relative to the quantity
of amphetamine), a single product, DAA, was detected by tlc. The crude DAA was subjected to silica gel
}
-
column chromatography using a mixture of ethyl acetate and n hexane (1:4 v v ratio) as developing
solvent. The chromatographedproduct was convertedto its HCl salt as described above in the synthesis
-
Ê
±
of AA.HCl. ( ) DAA.HCl was obtained in 85% yield as a colourless solid, m.p. 162.0 163.0 C when
±
6
"
-
recrystallized from ethyl acetate. H NMR (CDCl ) for DAA, d: 7.25 7.14 (m, 5H, Ph); 5.88 5.75 (m,
2H, two allyl CH); 5.22 5.08 (m, 4H, two terminal allyl CH ); 3.22 3.06 (m, 5H, two allyl N CH
overlapping N CH); 2.96 2.90 (dd, 1H, J 8 Hz and J 6 Hz; CH Ph); 2.44 2.36 (dd, 1H, J 8 and
3 Hz, CH Ph); 0.95 0.93 (d, 3H, J 5 Hz, CH CH ).
±
$
-
±
±
±
#
#
-
±
5
5
5
#
-
±
5
#
$
The electrospray mass spectrum of DAA was consistent with the proposed structure ( gure 2).
- - - -
- -
6
(
) N allyl N methylamphetamine (AMA). ( ) N methylamphetamine .HCl (200.0 mg; 1.08 mmol)
6
was suspended in CH CN (10 ml) and convertedto its free base by the addition of K CO solution (1 ml).
To the base (isolated by the method used in the preparation of AA and DAA), an excess of allyl bromide
$
#
$
(2.69 mmol; 233 ll) was added, followed by K CO solution (1 ml). The resulting mixture was stirred at
#
$
"
room temperature for 45 min at which time tlc monitoring of the reaction mixture indicated that 90%
of MA had been consumed. The residue obtained after solvent evaporationwas dissolved in H O (10 ml)
#
and basi ed with K CO solution, then extracted into CH Cl Chromatographic puri cation of the
.
#
$
#
#
-
crude product on silica gel using 2.5% CH OH in CH Cl as eluting solvent yielded ( ) AMA base
(224.0 mg; liquid) in 92.1% yield. The base was converted to its HCl salt and recrystallized from ethyl
acetateas a colourless solid, m.p. 130.5 132 C. H NMR (CDCl ), d: 7.30 7.16 (m, 5H, Ph); 5.95 5.82
(m, 1H, allyl CH); 5.30 5.12(m, 2H, terminal allyl CH ); 3.17 3.15(d, 2H, allyl N CH ); 3.02 2.95(m,
6
$
#
#
"
Ê
-
±
±
±
$
-
±
±
±
#
#
-
-
2H, one H of CH Ph overlapping N CH); 2.45 2.37 (dd, one H of CH Ph); 2.30 (s, 3H, N CH );
±
#
#
$
-
0.96 0.94 (d, 3H, J 5 Hz, CH CH ).
±
5
$
The electrospray mass spectrum of AMA was consistent with the proposed structure ( gure 2).
- - - - -
) N methyl N propylamphetamine (MPA). This N dialkylamphetamine was synthesized by a
(
6
-
)
procedure similar to that used for the preparation of AMA. The amine and halide reagent used was (
6
-
-
N methylamphetamine.HCl (1.38 mmol; 257.0 mg) and 1 bromopropane (2.76 mmol; 251.66 ll)
respectively. After 1 day of stirring at room temperature,a tlc of the reaction mixture was developed with
-
7% CH OH in CH Cl . This showed that almost no reaction had occurred, so more 1 bromopropane
$
#
#
(121 ll) and K CO solution (1.02 ml) were added and the reaction continued for another day. The crude
product (isolated as described in the preparation of AA and DAA) was chromatographed on a silica gel
column, initially with 2%, and subsequently with 5% CH OH in CH Cl . Fractions were collected and
examined by tlc. Those containing the desired product were eluted by 5% CH OH in CH Cl .
Evaporation of the combined eluates gave MPA as a liquid in modest yield (40%). MPA.HCl salt,
#
$
$
#
#
$
#
#