enantioselective Bischler-Napieralski5 disconnection sug-
gested that 4 could be constructed via the reaction of
synthons 6 with 7. Synthon 7 itself requires a diaryl ether
coupling disconnection. Vanillin (8) was chosen as the
starting compound for 6 (Scheme 2): bromination, followed
Scheme 3a
Scheme 2a
a Reagents and conditions: (a) Br2/CHCl3, rt 12 h (55%); (b)
i-PrBr, DMSO, K2CO3, 55 °C, 12 h (94%); (c) NaBH4, THF/MeOH,
rt, 2 h (98%); (d) TBSCl, imidazole, DMF, rt, 12 h (95%); (e)
n-BuLi/THF, -78 °Cfrt, 12 h; H2O2, rt, 24 h (14, 82%); (f) 14 +
15, Cu(OAc)2, py, CH2Cl2, 4 Å mol sieves, rt, 48 h (16, 57%); (g)
16, LiOH, 1:3:1 MeOH/THF/H2O, rt, 2 h (quant); (h) Tf2O, 2,6-
lutidine, CH2Cl2, -40 °C, (98%); (i) bis(pinacolato)diboron,
PdCl2(dppf), KOAc, dioxane, 80 °C, (19, 85%); (j) diethanolamine,
2-propanol, Et2O, (78%); (k) aq 1 M HCl, THF, rt (15, 85%).
a Reagents and conditions: (a) Br2, AcOH, rt, 1 h (94%); (b)
(CH3)2SO4, NaOH, Adogen 464R, CH2Cl2, rt, 15 h (89%); (c)
NaBH4, THF/MeOH, 2 h; (d) TBSCl, imidazole, DMF, rt, 12 h
(92%); (e) n-BuLi, -78 °C 1 h; B(OCH3)3, 12 h, -78 °Cfrt; H2O2,
rt, 12 h (78%); (f) BnBr, K2CO3, acetone, reflux, 12 h (75%); (g)
Bu4NF, THF, 0 °C, 2 h (quant); (h) SOCl2, benzene, rt, 12 h (88%);
(i) NaCN, DMSO/benzene, rt, (89%); (j) NaOH (4 M), EtOH,
reflux, 20 h (98%); (k) (COCl)2, benzene, rt, 2 h; (l) (S)-R-
methylbenzylamine, aq 5% NaOH/CH2Cl2 (1.5:1), rt, 1 h (90%);
(m) B2H6‚THF/BF3‚Et2O, THF, reflux; (n) aq 20% HCl (98%).
sequence. An isopropyl group7 was employed as the protect-
ing group since this allowed for selectivity in the removal
of protecting groups in the final step of the total synthesis.
Cu(OAc)2-mediated8 diaryl ether coupling of 14 with boronic
acid 15 afforded 16, which was hydrolyzed to the free
carboxylic acid synthon 7, using conditions that did not affect
the other two protecting groups.
by methylation, NaBH4 reduction, and protection of the
resulting primary alcohol as the TBS ether afforded 9 (92%).
Lithiation of 9 was followed by transmetalation to form the
arylboronate, which was quenched with hydrogen peroxide
to form the corresponding phenol.
Boronic acid 15 was synthesized via conversion of methyl
(4-hydroxyphenyl)acetate (17) to the triflate 18, followed by
PdCl2(dppf)-catalyzed coupling with bis(pinacolato)diboron9
to form the intermediate arylboronate 19. Conversion to 15
could only be efficiently accomplished using a procedure
similar to that described by Jung and Lazarova:9 reaction of
19 with diethanolamine formed the corresponding cyclic
aminoboronate intermediate, which could be more easily
hydrolyzed than 19, under acidic conditions, to 15 (Scheme
3).
Diastereoselective6 Bischler-Napieralski cyclization to
form synthon 4 was accomplished by the reactions shown
in Scheme 4: the chiral auxiliary-bearing synthon 6 con-
densed smoothly with 7 using HOBt/EDCI conditions10 to
form amide 20. A four-step sequence converted 20 into 22b
in 60% overall yield. Cyclization of 22b using typical
Bischler-Napieralski conditions, with POCl3 in benzene,
Protection of the phenolic group as the benzyl ether 10
was followed by homologation to the trisubstituted phenyl-
acetic acid 11. The readily available (S)-R-methylbenzy-
lamine6 was found to be the most efficient chiral auxiliary
to effect a diastereoselective Bischler-Napieralski cycliza-
tion at a subsequent stage. Reaction of 11 with (S)-R-
methylbenzylamine using Schotten-Baumann conditions
resulted in the amide 12 (90%), which was converted to
synthon 6.
Synthesis of the diaryl ether 7 was achieved in 40% overall
yield, using the reactions shown in Scheme 3: 4-hydroxy-
benzaldehyde (13) was converted to 14 via a five-step
(2) For reviews, see: (a) Guha, K. P.; Mukherjee, B.; Mukherjee, R. J.
Nat. Prod. 1979, 42, 1-84. (b) Schiff, P. L., Jr. J. Nat. Prod. 1983, 46,
1-43. (c) Schiff, P. L., Jr. J. Nat. Prod. 1987, 50, 529-599. (d) Schiff, P.
L., Jr. J. Nat. Prod. 1991, 54, 645-749. (e) Schiff, P. L., Jr. J. Nat. Prod.
1997, 60, 934-953.
(7) Banwell, M. G.; Flynn, B. L.; Stewart, S. G. J. Org. Chem. 1998,
63, 9139-9144.
(8) (a) Evans, D. A.; Katz, J. L.; West, T. R. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998,
39, 2937-2940. (b) Chan, D. M. T.; Monaco, K. L.; Wang, R. P.; Winters,
M. P. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 2933-2936. (c) Lam, P. Y. S.; Clark, C.
G.; Saubern, S.; Adams, J.; Winters, M. P.; Chan, D. M. T.; Combs, A.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 2941-2944.
(3) Bentley, K. W. The Isoquinoline Alkaloids; Harwood Academic
Publishers: Amsterdam, 1998; Vol. 1, pp 59-92.
(4) Shamma, M.; Foy, J. E.; Miana, G. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1974, 96,
7809-7811.
(5) Whaley, W. M.; Govindachari, T. R. Org. React. 1951, 6, 74-206.
(6) Polniaszek, R.; Kaufman, C. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 4859-
4863.
(9) Jung, M. E.; Lazarova, T. I. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 2976-2977.
(10) Evans, D. A.; Wood, M. R.; Trotter, B. W.; Richardson, T. I.;
Barrow, J. C.; Katz, J. L. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 2700-2704.
2676
Org. Lett., Vol. 4, No. 16, 2002