1676
P. J. Manley et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 13 (2003) 1673–1677
Acknowledgements
We thank Dr. Art Coddington, Dr. Chuck Ross, and
Dr. Harri Ramjit for mass spectral analyses, and Matt
Zrada for logP determinations. We also thank Dr. Cory
Theberge and Irma Escudero for their synthesis of
intermediates.
References and Notes
1. Adamis, A. P.; Shima, D. T.; Yeo, K. T.; Yeo, T. K.;
Brown, L. F.; Berse, B.; D’Amore, P. A.; Folkman, J. Bio-
chem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1993, 193, 631.
2. Giatromanolaki, A.; Sivridis, E.; Athanassou, N.; Zois, E.;
Thorpe, P. E.; Brekken, R. A.; Gatter, K. C.; Harris, A. L.;
Koukourakis, I. M.; Koukourakis, M. I. J. Pathol. 2001, 194,
101.
Figure 3. 16,17
3. Detmar, M. Dermatol. Sci. 2000, 24, S78.
4. (a) Carmeliet, P.; Jain, R. K. Nature 2000, 407, 249. (b)
Folkman, J. Nature Med. 1995, 1, 27.
5. (a) Hanahan, D.; Folkman, J. Cell 1996, 86, 353. (b)
Holmgen, L.; O’Reilly, M. S.; Folkman, J. Nat. Med. 1995, 1,
149.
Table 5. Comparison on intrinsic and cellular potency of compounds
1, 2b, 2d, 2f, 2h, 2k, 3a, 3c, and 3d12,13
Compd
KDRIC 50 (nM)
Cell IC50 (nM)
6. (a) Veikkola, T.; Karkkainen, M.; Claesson-Welsh, L.;
Alitalo, K. Cancer Res. 2000, 60, 203. (b) Thomas, K. A. J.
Biol. Chem. 1996, 271, 603.
7. Kim, K. J.; Li, B.; Winer, J.; Armanini, M.; Gillett, N.;
Phillips, H. S.; Ferrara, N. Nature 1993, 362, 841.
8. Witte, L.; Hicklin, D.; Zhu, Z.; Pytowski, B.; Kotanides,
H.; Rockwell, P.; Bohlen, P. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 1998, 17,
155.
9. (a) Fong, T. A. T.; Shawyer, L. K.; Sun, L.; Tang, C.; App,
H.; Powell, T. J.; Kim, Y. H.; Schreck, R.; Wang, X.; Risau,
W.; Ullrich, A.; Hirth, K. P.; McMahaon, G. Cancer Res.
1999, 59, 99. (b) Drevs, J.; Hofmann, I.; Hugenschmidt, H.;
Wittig, C.; Madjar, H.; Muller, M.; Wood, J.; Martiny-Baron,
G.; Unger, C.; Marme, D. Cancer Res. 2000, 60, 4819.
10. Bilodeau, M. T.; Fraley, M. E.; Hartman, G. D. Expert
Opin. Invest. Drugs 2002, 11, 737.
11. (a) Fraley, M. E.; Hoffman, W. F.; Rubino, R. S.; Hungate,
R. W.; Tebben, A. J.; Rutledge, R. Z.; McFall, R. C.; Huckle,
W. R.; Kendall, R. L.; Coll, K. E.; Thomas, K. A. Bioorg. Med.
Chem. Lett. 2002, 12, 2767. (b) Fraley, M. E.; Rubino, R. S.;
Hoffman, W. F.; Hambaugh, S. R.; Arrington, K. A.; Hun-
gate, R. W.; Bilodeau, M. T.; Tebben, A. J.; Rutledge, R. Z.;
Kendall, R. L.; McFall, R. C.; Huckle, W. R.; Coll, K. E.;
Thomas, K. A. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2002, 12, 3537.
1
105Æ7
18Æ3
6Æ1
8% inhibition @ 500
2b
2d
2f
2h
2k
3a
3c
3d
151
19
88
22
303
26
23
396
20Æ9
5Æ1
10Æ1
5Æ3
9Æ1
32Æ5
Table 6. Selectivity profile of compounds 1, 2b, and 2d
Compd PDGFRb FLT-1 FLT-4 FGFR-1 FGFR-2 SRC
1
2b
2d
nd
22
6
13
103
30
5
13
5
295
1023
606
nd
686
261
11
11
10
nd, not determined.
The selectivity profile of 1, 2b, and 2d is found in Table
6. The data, expressed as a ratio of IC50 to KDR
kinase, suggests modest selectivity versus the highly
homologous kinases PDGFRb, Flt-1, Flt-4, and SRC
kinases and high selectivity versus FGFR-1 and
FGFR-2. These data are representative for the entire
series.
12. The KDRIC value represents biochemical inhibition of
50
phosphorylation of a poly-Glu/Tyr (4:1) peptide substrate by
isolated KDRkinase (cloned and expressed as a GST-fusion
protein); see: Kendall, R. L.; Rutledge, R. Z.; Mao, X.; Teb-
ben, A. L.; Hungate, R. W.; Thomas, K. A. J. Biol. Chem.
1999, 274, 6453. Values are reported as single determinations
or as the average of at least two determinationsÆstandard
deviation.
13. The Cell IC50 value represents the inhibition of VEGF-
stimulated mitogenesis as determined in human umbilical vein
endothelial cells.
14. All target compounds were fully characterized by 1H
NMRand mass spectroscopy.
In this series, the optimized compound 2d exhibits
excellent intrinsic activity and cell potency with modest
kinase selectivity. 2d has the following physical and
pharmacokinetic properties: a logP of 3.7418 with a high
clearance (Cl=30.10Æ1.27 mL/min/kg), volume of dis-
tribution (Vdss=1.11Æ0.01 L/kg), and short half-life
(t1/2=0.71Æ0.01 h) in dogs.
15. For a description of the ATP binding region of protein
tyrosine kinases, see: Traxler, P.; Furet, P. Pharmacol. Ther.
1999, 82, 195.
In conclusion we have investigated the SARfor KDR
inhibition of lead compound 1. meta-Substitution of the
aniline portion of compound 1 led to potency enhance-
ments both with the enzyme and in cells.
16. 6 was synthesized according to Scheme 1 starting with
commercially available 4,6-dichloropyrimidine. 8 was synthe-
sized according to Scheme 2 using 4(5)-methyl-2-phenylimid-
azole as the imidazole in the last step.