M. Dashteh et al.
Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids 160 (2022) 110322
Fig. 7. (a) Recyclability study of [Ni(TPPAH)][C(NO2)3]4 in synthesis of 10d after 10 min and (b) XRD pattern of [Ni(TPPAH)][C(NO2)3]4 after four consecu-
tive runs.
from the monocyclic ring in the [Ni(TPPAH)][C(NO2)3]4, compared
Table 4
with [Ni(TPPA)] which shows B or Soret band at 368 nm [35,36]. The
Elemental analysis of recycled [Ni(TPPAH)][C(NO2)3]4.
optical band-gap energy (Ebg = 1240/λmax) for [Ni(TPPAH)][C(NO2)3]4
Element
C
H
N
is 1.98 eV.
FT-IR analysis: The FT-IR analysis of [Ni(TPPAH)][C(NO2)3]4 is
Wt.%
Experimental
32.10
31.68
1.73
1.50
27.95
27.71
achieved in the range of 400–4000 cmꢀ 1 (Fig. 2). The FT-IR spectrum
shows the functional groups that exist in this compound. The broad
peaks around 3209 and 3070 cmꢀ 1 are assigned to the stretching vi-
brations of N–H and aromatic C–H bands, respectively (the broad peaks
at 3387 and 3064 cmꢀ 1 are related to stretching vibrations of O–H in
surface and aromatic C–H bands in [Ni(TPPA)], respectively). The sharp
peaks at 1531 and 1345 cmꢀ 1 can be attributed to the stretching
vibrational modes of –NO2. Remarkably, the peak at 761 cmꢀ 1 is con-
nected to Ni–ligand coordination bonds (the peak at 738 cmꢀ 1 is linked
to formation of Ni–ligand coordination bonds).
Computational
solid mass precipitate was filtered off and washed with ethanol to
separate the catalyst from other materials (the catalyst was insoluble in
ethanol and the reaction mixture was soluble). The solvent of the filtrate
was evaporated and the crude product was recrystallized from ethanol
to give the corresponding products 8–11. The analytical data and
spectral images for compounds are presented in the Supporting
Information.
TGA and DTA: The TGA is applied for determination of thermal
stability of [Ni(TPPAH)][C(NO2)3]4 up to 600 ◦C (Fig. 3). These analyses
show about 2% weight loss around 25–100 ◦C that can be ascribed to
elimination of the adsorbed water and other physically adsorbed sol-
vents remaining from the extraction procedure. The second weight loss
(about 14%) at 240–325 ◦C is because of removal of the trini-
tromethanide group after the extraction procedure. Lastly, the chief
weight loss (about 17%) in the range of 325–430 ◦C is ascribed to
decomposition of the nickel tetra-2,3-pyridiniumporphyrazinato group.
The TGA and DTA curves show that this compound is stable up to
430 ◦C. At temperatures above 430 ◦C, the structure of the catalyst is not
stable and is destroyed.
3. Results and discussion
3.1. Characterization of [Ni(TPPAH)][C(NO2)3]4
The [Ni(TPPA)] was produced via the process of Yokote et al. [33], in
the
reaction
of
urea,
2,3-pyridine-dicarboxylic
acid,
(NH4)6Mo7O24⋅4H2O and NiCl2⋅6H2O. In the next step, [Ni(TPPAH)][C
(NO2)3]4 was formed using reaction between [Ni(TPPA)] and trinitro-
methane in ethanol-acetonitrile (1:1) under reflux conditions. Finally,
the morphology and structure of novel [Ni(TPPAH)][C(NO2)3]4 were
studied using several techniques: UV–Vis, FT-IR, thermal gravimetric
analysis (TGA), differential thermal analysis (DTA), inductively coupled
plasma (ICP) spectroscopy, CHN analysis, diffuse reflectance spectros-
copy (DRS), energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX), scanning
electron microscopy (SEM)-coupled EDX (SEM mapping), X-ray
diffraction (XRD), field emission (FE)-SEM and transmission electron
microscopy (TEM). The lone-pair electrons of the non-coordinated ni-
trogens of the catalyst precursor are orthogonal to ring p-orbitals which
participate in aromaticity and are coordinated to the central metal (Ni).
Therefore, these non-coordinated lone pairs are completely concen-
trated and localized at their corresponding nitrogens. Thus, these ni-
trogens have more basic ability than others. The acidic protons of
trinitromethane connect to two near non-coordinated nitrogen lone
pairs of the catalyst structure via hydrogen bonding (driving force of
hydrogen bonding via formation of 5-membered ring).
ICP and CHN analysis: The exact percentage of Ni in [Ni(TPPAH)][C
(NO2)3]4 is 3.45 wt% according to the ICP result. The CHN analysis of
[Ni(TPPAH)][C(NO2)3]4 is summarized in Table 1. The CHN data of [Ni
(TPPA)] and [Ni(TPPAH)][C(NO2)3]4 are shown in Figs. S43 and S44.
DRS analysis: The DRS and Kubelka–Munk function (derived from
DRS) of [Ni(TPPAH)][C(NO2)3]4 are investigated (Fig. 4). The main
peaks in the range 300–400 nm show the transition between valence
band and conduction band. The weak absorption in the UV–Vis region is
probably due to transitions including outer states; for example surface
traps, deficiency states, or impurity. The Kubelka–Munk theory is
applied to describe the energy band gap of the [Ni(TPPAH)][C(NO2)3]4
produced from DRS. The measured band gap energy for [Ni(TPPAH)][C
(NO2)3]4 is 1.98 eV (based on UV–Vis spectrum). The broad band at
around 569 nm is due to the electronic ligand–field transition of Ni2+ in
tetrahedral coordination [37–39].
UV–Vis analysis: The UV–Vis spectrum of the [Ni(TPPAH)][C
(NO2)3]4 in DMSO displays a strong Q-band at 631 nm (Fig. 1b),
compared with [Ni(TPPA)] which shows a strong Q-band at 627 nm
(Fig. 1a). Also the visible absorption spectra display a vibration satellite
at 572 nm – compared with [Ni(TPPA)] which displays a vibration
satellite at 569 nm – and this band is characteristic for Pc derivatives and
the blue shift of the Q-band corresponding to Pcs is typical of pyr-
idinoporphyrazine complexes [34]. Additionally, the characteristic
EDX analysis and SEM mapping: The homogeneous and corre-
sponding signals of the elements C, N, Ni and O are clearly shown in the
EDX elemental mapping (Fig. 5), additionally confirming that the tri-
nitromethanide molecules are attached on the [Ni(TPPA)] surface by
close interface exchange. As predictable, C is the chief element for all
materials, with average contents about 61.7 wt%. This analysis shows
average contents of 14.9 wt% N, 12.5 wt% Ni and 10.9 wt% O.
band at the 374 nm region (B or Soret band) relates to π→π* transition
7