5566
A. K. Singh, P. K. Khade / Tetrahedron Letters 46 (2005) 5563–5566
392.1268 (M++Na) calcd for C24H19NO3 392.1263
and 41.3. 1e: Yield 50%; Mp: 108–110 ꢁC; FTIR (KBr)
mmax (cmÀ1): 1723 (OCOCH3); GC–MS (% rel int): 250
(M+, 33), 191 (100), 165 (7) and 94 (9); 1H NMR
(300 MHz, CDCl3): 8.51(s, H1, Ar-H), 8.33 (d,
J = 8.8 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 8.03 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H, Ar-H),
7.58 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 7.49 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H, Ar-
H), 6.15 (s, 2H, OCH2) and 2.09 (s, 3H, CH3); 13C NMR
(75 MHz): d 171.2, 131.3, 131.0, 129.2, 129.1, 126.6, 126.1,
125.1, 123.9, 58.9 and 21.2.
(M++Na); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): d 8.54 (s, 1H,
Ar-H), 8.36 (d, J = 10 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 8.04 (d, J = 8.4 Hz,
2H, Ar-H), 7.77 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 7.59 (t,
J = 4.8 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 7.50 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H, Ar-H),
7.43 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 6.62 (br s, 2H, NH), 6.30 (s,
2H, CH2O) and 4.25 (d, J = 4.8 Hz, 2H, CH2); 13C NMR
(100 MHz): d 170.3, 167.6, 133.8, 131.9, 131.4, 131.1,
129.7, 129.3, 128.7, 127.1, 126.9, 125.3, 123.8, 60.1 and
41.9. 1c: Yield 81%; Mp: 152–154 ꢁC; FTIR (KBr) mmax
(cmÀ1): 1723 (OCO), 1538 and 1354 (NO2); GC–MS (% rel
int): 380 (M++Na, 11), 362 (12), 300 (100), 281 (42), 204
(23), 165 (17), 140 (33), 115 (41) and 91 (38); 1H NMR
(300 MHz, CDCl3): d 8.81(t, J = 2.4 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 8.56
(s, 1H, Ar-H), 8.42 (d, J = 9 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 8.36–8.27 (m,
2H, Ar-H), 8.06 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 7.64–7.49 (m,
5H, Ar-H) and 6.46 (s, 2H, CH2O); 13C NMR (75 MHz): d
164.8, 135.5, 131.9, 131.5, 131.3, 129.7, 129.6, 129.3, 127.5,
127.0, 125.5, 125.3, 124.8, 123.8 and 60.4. 1d: Yield 64%;
Mp: 112–114 ꢁC; FTIR (KBr) mmax (cmÀ1): 1744 (OCO);
GC–MS (% rel int): 326 (M+, 17), 191 (100), 165 (6) and 91
11. Rabek, J. F. Radiometry and Actinometry. In Experi-
mental Methods in Photochemistry and Photophysics;
Wiley: New York, 1982; Vol. 2, pp 944–946, The Uf
against anthracene (Uf, 0.2 in ethanol) as a standard was
determined at ambient temperature. The UPR was calcu-
lated for ester disappearance at 386 nm, and the number
of quanta absorbed were calculated by ferrioxalate acti-
nometry. Photolyses were performed using a 400 W
medium pressure Hg lamp and the desired wavelengths
were obtained by using a monochromator/>370 nm glass
filter having 47% and 96% transmittance at 370 and
420 nm, respectively. The distance between the sample and
the lamp was 2 cm. HPLC analyses were performed on a
Hitachi instrument consisting of a L-6250 intelligent pump
and a U-2000 spectrophotometer under the following
conditions: column, ALTEX ODS (5l, 4.6 mm · 25 cm),
solvent, CH3CN–H2O (3:2 v/v), flow rate, 0.8 mL/min,
detection k 226 nm.
1
(12); H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): d 8.48 (s, 1H, Ar-H),
8.27 (d, J = 8 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 8.01(d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H, Ar-
H), 7.78–7.45 (m, 4H, Ar-H), 7.32–7.23 (m, 5H, Ar-H),
6.15 (s, 2H, CH2O) and 3.62 (s, 2H, CH2); 13C NMR
(75 MHz): d 171.9, 134.2, 133.9, 131.4, 131.1, 129.4, 129.3,
129.1, 128.6, 127.3, 127.2, 126.7, 126.1, 125.2, 124.0, 59.4