2320
U. Velaparthi et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 17 (2007) 2317–2321
intramolecular hydrogen bond between the side chain
NH and nitrogen atom of the benzimidazole further
locks the conformation of benzimidazole and pyridone
across the biaryl bond as depicted in Figure 2.
The results described herein represent our initial efforts
toward the development of 3-(1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-
yl)pyridin-2(1H)-one inhibitors of insulin-like growth
factor-1 receptor. This preliminary exploration unrav-
eled some important features such as the importance
of stabilization of the tautomeric form of benzimidazole
for productive binding to Met 123 that is critical for
IGF-1R inhibitor activity. Future efforts will focus on
expanding upon current findings reported herein to
identify analogs with desired ADME properties and
in vivo efficacy.
This result led us to examine other secondary amine side
chain analogs at C-4 pyridone to further enhance the
potency via a focused library approach. The submicro-
molar activity of 2-pyridyl methylamine 24 prompted
us prepare the regio isomeric 3-pyridyl 27 and 4-pyridyl
28 methylamines. Both analogs were inactive, suggesting
that a heteroatom at the 2-position on the side chain is
desirable. In the X-ray crystal structure (Fig. 2), the
nitrogen of pyridyl points to the sulfur Met183. Further
exploration of other heterocycles that contain a hetero-
atom in the 2-position (29–32) displayed weak activity.
The homolog of 24 with two carbon spacer (33) retained
the potency, whereas the corresponding phenethylamine
34 displayed reduced potency. Interestingly, introduc-
tion of hydroxymethyl group as in 35 restored the poten-
cy.18 However, the combination analog 36 of 33 and 35
resulted in reduced potency.
Acknowledgments
We thank Dr. Stella Huang and Dr. Dan Schroeder for
analytical support.
References and notes
1. (a) Baserga, R. Expert Opin. Ther. Targets 2005, 9, 753;
(b) Pollak, M. N.; Schernhammer, E. S.; Hankinson, S. E.
Nat. Rev. Cancer 2004, 4, 505; (c) Yee, D. Br. J. Cancer
2006, 94, 465.
2. (a) Hofmann, F.; Garcia-Echeverria, C. Drug Discovery
Today 2005, 10, 1041; (b) Garcia-Echeverria, C. IDrugs
2006, 9, 415; (c) Bahr, C.; Groner, B. Growth Horm. IGF
Res. 2004, 14, 287; (d) Zhang, H.; Yee, D. Expert Opin.
Investig. Drugs 2004, 13, 1569.
Attempting to optimize the ring substitution of 24 with
both electron withdrawing and donating groups led to
no improvement in potency (data not shown), whereas
ring substitution on phenyl ring 35 yielded modest
improvements in IGF-1R inhibition (Table 2).
Substitution at the para position with both electron
donating (39 and 40) and halogenated (37 and 38)
groups proved to be detrimental to the activity. Accord-
ing to the crystal structure, the receptor appears to be
rather tight in that region. Electron withdrawing groups
on both meta (42) and ortho positions (47) appeared to
have detrimental effect as well. Electron donating groups
and halogens at meta (43–46) and ortho (49–52) posi-
tions appear to maintain IGF-1R inhibitory activity.
Importantly, halogen substituents especially in the
ortho-position improved the enzyme potency as exempli-
fied by 2-bromo analog 52 that displayed 290 nM (IC50)
potency against IGF1-R. The fact that bromine is pre-
ferred at ortho position is consistent with the productive
interaction of aryl bromide with Met197. Further mod-
ifications such as bis-substitution on the phenyl ring did
not improve enzyme potency suggesting mono substitu-
tion was optimal on the phenyl ring. At this stage, select-
ed compounds were evaluated in HT29 whole-cell assay
to demonstrate cell-based activity.12 As shown in Table
3, compound 52 demonstrated sub-micromolar cell-
based potency in a MTT proliferation assay.
3. (a) Sell, C.; Rubini, M.; Liu, J.-P.; Efstratiadis, A.;
Baserga, R. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1993, 90,
11217; (b) Sell, C.; Dumenil, G.; Deveaud, C.; Miura, M.;
Coppola, D.; De Angelis, T.; Rubin, R.; Efstratiadis, A.;
Baserga, R. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1994, 14, 3604.
4. (a) Reiss, K.; D’Ambrosio, C.; Tu, X.; Tu, C.; Baserga, R.
Clin. Cancer Res. 1998, 4, 2647; (b) Sachdev, D.; Li, S. L.;
Hartell, J. S.; Fujita-Yamaguchi, Y.; Miller, J. S.; Yee, D.
Cancer Res. 2003, 63, 627.
5. Khandwala, H. M.; McCutcheon, I. E.; Flyvbjerg, A.;
Friend, K. E. Endocrine Rev. 2000, 213, 215.
6. (a) Garcia-Echeverria, C.; Pearson, M. A.; Marti, A.;
Meyer, T.; Mestan, J.; Zimmermann, J.; Gao, J.; Brueg-
gen, J.; Capraro, H. G.; Cozens, R.; Evans, D. B.; Fabbro,
D.; Furet, P.; Porta, D. G.; Liebetanz, J.; Martiny-Baron,
G.; Ruetz, S.; Hoffman, F. Cancer Cell 2004, 5, 231; (b)
Mitsiades, C. S.; Mitsiades, N. S.; McMullan, C. J.;
Poulaki, V.; Shringarpure, R.; Akiyama, M.; Hideshima,
T.; Chauhan, D.; Joseph, M.; Libermann, T. A.; Garcia-
Echeverria, C.; Pearson, M. A.; Hoffmann, F.; Anderson,
K. C.; Kung, A. L. Cancer Cell 2004, 5, 221.
7. Bell, I. M.; Stirdivant, S. M.; Ahern, J.; Cullberson, C.;
Darke, P. L.; Dinsmore, C. J.; Drakas, R. A.; Gallicchio,
S. N.; Graham, S. L.; Heimbrook, D. C.; Hall, D. L.; Hua,
J.; Kett, N. R.; Kim, A. S.; Kornienko, M.; Kuo, L. C.;
Munshi, S. K.; Quigley, A. G.; Reid, J. C.; Trotter, W.;
Waxman, L. H.; Williams, T. M.; Zartman, C. B.
Biochemistry 2005, 44, 9430.
Table 3. Cell-based activities12 for selected compounds in HT29 cells
Compound
IGF-1R IC50 (lM)
HT29 (lM)
8. (a) Girnita, A.; Girnita, L.; del Prete, F.; Bartolazzi,
A.; Larsson, O.; Axelson, M. Cancer Res. 2004, 64,
236; (b) Vasilcanu, D.; Girnita, A.; Girnita, L.;
Vasilcanu, R.; Axelson, M.; Larsson, O. Oncogene
2004, 23, 7854.
9. (a) Blum, G.; Gazit, A.; Levitzki, A. J. Biol. Chem. 2003,
278, 40442; (b) Girnita, A.; Girnita, L.; del Prete, F.;
Bartolazzi, A.; Larsson, O.; Axelson, M. Cancer Res.
2004, 64, 236.
24
35
43
44
45
46
50
52
0.39
0.53
0.66
0.59
0.98
0.59
0.57
0.29
7.6 1.3
0.78 0.3
1.6
1.3
1.1
2.1 1.2
1.2
0.83 0.33