3848
Organometallics 2002, 21, 3848-3849
Ra d ica l Ar om a tic Su bstitu tion s on
(η6-Ch lor oa r en e)tr ica r bon ylch r om iu m Com p lexes
Hechun Lin,‡ Li Yang,‡ and Chaozhong Li*,†
Shanghai Institute of Organic Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 354 Fenglin Road,
Shanghai 200032, People’s Republic of China, and State Key Laboratory of Applied Chemistry,
Lanzhou University, Gansu, Lanzhou 730000, People’s Republic of China
Received J une 12, 2002
Summary: Successful radical aromatic substitutions on
chloroarene-Cr(CO)3 complexes were carried out by
reaction with SmI2 and a carbonyl compound in THF/
HMPA at -30 to -40 °C to afford the corresponding
products in 66-89% yield. Deuterated experiments
revealed that the mechanism was preferably meta-
tele-substitution.
(CO)3 (4a ), while more than 90% of the starting material
3 was recovered. However, when we treated chloroben-
zene-Cr(CO)3 (5) with SmI2 (4 equiv) and acetone (2
equiv) in THF/HMPA with t-BuOH (2 equiv) as the
proton source at 0 °C for 4 h, 63% of the substitution
product 4a was obtained. When the reaction was carried
out at lower temperature (-30 to -40 °C) for 4 h, 4a
was achieved in 78% yield along with 14% of the
dechlorination product benzene-Cr(CO)3 and 7% of 5
was recovered (eq 1). Other ketones and even aldehydes
underwent similar reactions, and the results are listed
in Table 1.
Nucleophilic aromatic substitutions on halogenated
arene metal complexes are one of the unique charac-
teristics of organometallic chemistry and have attracted
considerable interest in organic synthesis.1 However,
successful free radical substitutions on haloarene metal
complexes have never been reported, although attempts
to carry out such transformations could be traced back
to the 1950s.2 Recently, a few examples of intramolecu-
lar radical substitutions on (η6-methoxybenzene)-Cr-
(CO)3 derivatives were reported by Schmalz et al. which
led to the demethoxylated products (e.g., 1 and 2).3
However, the general picture of the intermolecular
radical substitution chemistry remains obscure. We
report here the first examples of radical substitutions
on chloroarene-Cr(CO)3 complexes by reaction with
SmI2 and ketones or aldehydes.4
To gain more information on the radical substitution
pattern, we chose o-, m-, and p-chlorotoluene-Cr(CO)3
complexes to subject to the reaction with SmI2/acetone,
and the results are presented in Table 2. The reaction
of m-chlorotoluene-Cr(CO)3 complex 6 with Me2CO/
SmI2 afforded 7 in 74% yield as the only product, while
o-chlorotoluene-Cr(CO)3 (8) yielded two substitution
products, 7 (32%) and 9 (43%). For p-chlorotoluene-Cr-
(CO)3 (10), the reaction was slightly slower, and only
36% yield of substitution products were isolated within
4 h while 53% of the starting 10 was recovered.
However, when the reaction was carried out for a longer
period of time (12 h), the substitution products 11 (18%)
and 7 (55%) were achieved in satisfactory overall yield
(73%).
Reaction of anisole-Cr(CO)3 complex (3) with SmI2
and acetone at various reaction conditions yielded no
product or only a trace amount of PhC(OH)Me2-Cr-
As can be seen in Table 2, complexes 8 and 10 gave
both cine- and tele-substitution products, while no ipso-
substitution products could be detected. This regiose-
lectivity is different from that in ordinary homolytic
aromatic substitutions5 or that in nucleophilic aromatic
substitutions on chloroarene-Cr(CO)3 complexes,1 in
which ipso-substitutions are observed in many cases.
The results prompted us to check the reactions of 5 and
6 that appear to proceed via the ipso-substitution
process. Thus, p-D-chlorobenzene-Cr(CO)3 complex (12)6
* Corresponding author. E-mail: clig@pub.sioc.ac.cn.
† Shanghai Institute of Organic Chemistry.
‡ State Key Laboratory of Applied Chemistry.
(1) (a) Semmelhack, M. F. In Comprehensive Organic Synthesis;
Trost, B. M., Fleming, I., Eds.; Pergamon: New York, 1991; Vol. 4, p
517. (b) Semmelhack, M. F. In Comprehensive Organometallic Chem-
istry II; Abel, E. W., Stone, F. G. A., Wilkinson, G., Eds.; Pergamon:
New York, 1995; Vol. 12, p 979. (c) Pape, A. R.; Kaliappan, K. P.;
Kundig, E. P. Chem. Rev. 2000, 100, 2917.
(2) Nicholls, B.; Whiting, M. C. J . Chem. Soc. 1959, 551.
(3) (a) Schmalz, H.-G.; Siegel, S.; Bats, J . W. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. Engl. 1995, 34, 2383. (b) Schmalz, H.-G.; Siegel, S.; Schwarz, A.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 2947. (c) Hoffmann, O.; Schmalz, H.-G.
Synlett 1998, 1426. (d) Schwarz, O.; Brun, R.; Bats, J . W.; Schmalz,
H.-G. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 1009.
(5) Studer, A.; Bossart, M. In Radicals in Organic Synthesis;
Renaud, P., Sibi, M. P., Eds.; Wiley-VCH: New York, 2001; Vol. 2, p
62.
(6) Takamuku, S.; Hori, H. M. A.; Sakurai, H. J . Am. Chem. Soc.
1980, 102, 1441.
(4) For reviews on SmI2-mediated radical reactions, see: (a) Molan-
der, G. A. In Radicals in Organic Synthesis; Renaud, P., Sibi, M. P.,
Eds.; Wiley-VCH: New York, 2001; Vol. 1, p 153. (b) Molander, G. A.;
Harris, C. R. Chem. Rev. 1996, 96, 307.
10.1021/om020466l CCC: $22.00 © 2002 American Chemical Society
Publication on Web 08/22/2002