C. Len et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 44 (2003) 663–666
665
Scheme 2. Reagents and conditions: (i) AD-mix a, tert-BuOH, H2O; (ii) AD-mix b, tert-BuOH, H2O.
The benzo[c]furanones 10S and 10R having one asym-
metric carbon atom were obtained in good yields start-
ing from the achiral phthalaldehyde. The key steps of
this route were the introduction of a chiral protected
Homologation of the remaining formyl group was
effected by a Wittig reaction to afford the styrene
derivative 3 (Scheme 1). Dihydroxylation using OsO4
gave a mixture of two diastereomeric diols 4 and 5 in
the ratio 1:1, which were separated by column chro-
matography and obtained in similar yields. The diols 4
and 5 were obtained in pure form after a classical
purification by silica gel chromatography. It is notewor-
thy that the use of monoacetonexylose as chiral protect-
ing group did not lead to any diaselectivity in the
oxidation step. This lack of selectivity has already been
observed in the Corey epoxidation starting from 2.11
This is perhaps due to the chiral protecting group being
too far from the oxidation centre. Removal of the
acetal from compounds 4 and 5 in an acidic medium
gave the desired benzo[c]furan and the isochromane
derivatives. A selective protection of the primary
hydroxyl group was required to selectively obtain only
the isobenzofurane derivative. Reaction of the diol 4
with benzoyl chloride afforded the intermediate 6 with
a free secondary hydroxyl group. The monoacetonexyl-
ose was removed by treatment with acetic acid in water,
which was followed by spontaneous cyclization between
the hydroxyl and formyl groups to give the heterocycles
8a (1S,3S) and 8b (1R,3S) in the ratio 1:1. The two
epimers 8 were each oxidized using different procedures
to give poor yields of 10S and 10R. The best result was
group derived from
D-xylose and the use of the asym-
metric dihydroxylation developed by Sharpless. The
antiviral evaluation of each enantiomerically pure lac-
tones 10S and 10R is underway.
Acknowledgements
We thank ‘Le Conseil Regional de Picardie’ for finan-
cial support and G. Mackenzie for assistance in the
preparation of the paper.
References
1. De Clercq, E. J. Med. Chem. 1995, 38, 2491–2517.
2. Mitsuya, H.; Weinhold, K. J.; Furman, P. A.; St. Clair,
M. H.; Nusinoff-Lehrman, S.; Gallo, R. C.; Bolognesi,
D. P.; Barry, D. W.; Broder, S. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
USA 1985, 82, 7096–7100.
3. Cooney, D. A.; Dalal, M.; Mitsuya, H.; McMahon, J. B.;
Nadkarni, M.; Balzarini, J.; Broder, S.; Johns, D. G.
Biochem. Pharmacol. 1986, 35, 2065–2068.
17
obtained using RuCl3–NaIO4 to give solely 10S in
50% yield. Compound 5 gave the enantiomer 10R in a
4. Ahluwalia, G.; Cooney, D. A.; Mitsuya, H.; Fridland, A.;
Flora, K. P.; Hao, Z.; Dalal, M.; Broder, S.; Johns, D. G.
Biochem. Pharmacol. 1986, 35, 3797–3800.
similar yield.18
Sharpless asymmetric dihydroxylation (Scheme 2) using
AD-mix a and AD-mix b afforded the diols 4 and 5
with a diastereomeric excess of 99% and 98% respec-
tively (HPLC determination). The absolute configura-
tion of the chiral centre in the diol 4 was determined by
X-ray crystallography (S configuration)19 and was in
accordance with the mnemonic device developed by
Sharpless20,21 and our own asymmetric dihydroxylation
study.22
5. Coates, J. A. V.; Cammack, N. S.; Jenkinson, H. J.;
Jowett, A. J.; Jowett, M. I.; Pearson, B. A.; Pen, C. R.;
Rouse, P. L.; Viner, K. C.; Cameron, J. M. Antimicrob.
Agents Chemother. 1992, 36, 733–739.
6. Balzarini, J.; Kang, G. J.; Dalal, M.; Herdewijn, P.; De
Clercq, E.; Broder, S.; Johns, D. G. Mol. Pharmacol.
1987, 32, 162–167.
7. Crimmins, M. T.; King, B. W. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61,
4192–4193.