Scheme 3. Revised Synthesis of Hydroxyselenide 16
the fully protected arene 12, and halogen-metal exchange
A second synthetic strategy was developed to address this
problematic deprotection issue. Because the silyl ether could
be readily removed, it appeared attractive to protect the
phenolic functionality as a silyl ether as well. However,
introduction of the phenolic silyl ether would have to follow
the alkylation step in the synthetic sequence, because
migration of the silyl group from the oxygen to the adjacent
ortho carbon has been observed in similar reactions.10
Therefore, an ethoxyethyl-protected phenol was envisioned
for the sequence up to and including the alkylation step, at
which point it would be removed and a silyl ether installed
in its place.11
Direct protection of the phenol as the ethoxyethyl ether
was not successful under acidic conditions, so an indirect
route was employed. The known alcohol 17,12 also available
from vanillin, was disilylated and then selectively cleaved
to the free phenol 19 by treatment with 1.0 equiv of
tetrabutylammonium fluoride13 (Scheme 3). An acid-
catalyzed reaction of compound 19 with ethyl vinyl ether
gave the fully protected aryl bromide 20. This intermediate
can be prepared in multigram quantities in an overall yield
of 68% from vanillin without need for a chromatographic
separation. Application of the halogen-metal exchange
protocol and reaction with geranyl bromide afforded the
analogous geranylated arene, which upon acidic workup gave
the free phenol 21. After silylation of the free phenol, the
material was subjected to oxidation, and epoxide opening
analogous to that used on arene 13 delivered the protected
R-hydroxyselenide 24. The deprotected target 16 could be
obtained in 84% yield by treatment of the disilylated material
with excess TBAF.
followed by reaction with geranyl bromide allowed instal-
lation of the geranyl chain in 74% yield. An mCPBA
epoxidation of compound 13 initially afforded a 1:1 mixture
of the regioisomeric 6,7- and 2,3-epoxides in 55% yield along
with the diepoxide (7%). Even though careful column
chromatography could separate the two regioisomers, the low
yield of the desired product was unattractive. When the
reaction was conducted at lower temperatures with slow
addition of the oxidant, the yield of the desired 6,7-epoxide
14 increased to 53% along with only 8% of the 2,3-epoxide
and significant recovery of the starting material (32%).
Epoxide 14 reacted smoothly with phenylselenide anion
generated in situ9 to give the hydroxyselenide 15 in 83%
yield.
The only transformations remaining prior to cyclization
were removal of the two protecting groups, but in the best
case scenario this was done through a two-step procedure.
Initial treatment with 0.5 M HCl hydrolyzed the silyl ether,
and subsequent treatment with 1.0 M HCl hydrolyzed the
MOM acetal in an overall yield of 33%. Despite numerous
attempts, all efforts at removing both protecting groups in a
single step gave either incomplete deprotection or lower
yields with greater byproduct formation.
(4) (a) Barua, A. K.; Banerjee, S. K.; Basak, A.; Bose, P. K. J. Indian
Chem. Soc. 1976, 53, 638-639. (b) Manners, G.; Jurd, L.; Stevens, K.
Tetrahedron 1972, 28, 2949-2959. (c) Trammell, G. L. Tetrahedron Lett.
1978, 1525-1528.
(5) Mechoulam and Yagen have reported cyclization of geranylolivetol
in 88% yield, but this required heating with concentrated H2SO4 in
nitromethane. Mechoulam, R.; Yagen, B. Tetrahedron Lett. 1969, 5349-
5352.
(6) (a) For a review, cf.: Harring, S. R.; Edstrom, E. D.; Livinghouse,
T. In AdVances in Heterocyclic Natural Product Synthesis; Pearson, H. W.,
Ed.; Jai Press: Greenwich, CT, 1992; Vol 2., pp 299-376. For more recent
examples, cf.: (b) Branchaud, B. P.; Blanchette, H. S. Tetrahedron Lett.
2002, 43, 351-353. (c) Toshimitsu, A.; Hirosawa, C.; Tamao, K. Synlett
1996, 465-467 and references therein.
(7) (a) Kametani, T.; Suzuki, K.; Kurobe, H.; Nemoto, H. J. Chem. Soc.,
Chem. Commun. 1979, 1128-1129. (b) Kametani, T.; Kurobe, H.; Nemoto,
H.; Fukumoto, K. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1982, 1085-87.
(8) Boger, D. L.; Jacobson, I. C. J. Org. Chem. 1991, 56, 2115-2122.
(9) Sharpless, K. B.; Lauer, R. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1973, 95, 2697-
2699.
(10) When treated with n-butyllithium, both compound 18 and the TIPS
analogue show a 1,3 O-C silyl migration in the only isolable products.
(11) The EE group was not carried throughout the sequence to avoid
introduction of diastereomers and because the phenolic EE group was readily
cleaved upon silica gel column chromatography.
(12) (a) Brink, M. Acta Chem. Scand. 1965, 19, 255-256. (b) Claus,
P.; Schilling, P.; Gratzl, J. S.; Kratzl, K. Monatsh. Chem. 1972, 103, 1178-
1193.
(13) Collington, E. W.; Finch, H.; Smith, I. J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1985,
26, 681-684.
Org. Lett., Vol. 4, No. 21, 2002
3641