Figure 1. Calculated structures of Li+ binding to trimethylethylene (lithium cation lies above the olefinic plane at the approximate distance
of 2 Å).
the cis methyl groups was calculated to be more stable by 1
kcal/mol than that in which the cation sits on top in the
middle of the C-C double bond.
On the basis of the experimental results and the theoretical
calculations, we propose in Scheme 4 a model that can
requirements of a perepoxide as is evident from the lack of
a primary isotope effect in the photooxygenation of cis-
tetramethylethylene-d6.6 For trisubstituted alkene such as 1,
the alkali metal cation binds to the double bond, forming
two species either to the more or to the less substituted side
of the alkene. The cation-double bond interaction is strong,14
and it is likely to play a significant role in the stability of
the transition states of the hydroperoxidation reaction.
Recently, it was calculated that in the gas phase the Na+-
ethylene interaction is exothermic by 12.7 kcal/mol, and the
cation sits in the middle of the double bond.15
Scheme 4a
The incoming oxygen can form the four possible inter-
mediates in which the singlet oxygen and cation can be
placed in the same or at different sides of the double bond.
Considering the electrostatic interaction of the negatively
charged pendant oxygen of the perepoxide to the cation,6
we assume that the intermediates in which the oxygen is
placed on the same side of the alkene as the cation are the
most favorable. In the transition state for the formation of
perepoxide PEI, oxygen interacts simultaneously with one
allylic hydrogen (D in the present case) and the positively
charged cation. Therefore, it gains significant stabilization.
It is likely that in the transition state leading to PEI, the cation
has moved from its original position in the complex with
the olefin, resulting in a more efficient interaction with the
negatively charged oxygen atom. On the other hand, when
the cation binds on the more substituted side of the alkene,
steric factors place the alkyl group in a conformation away
from the cation as has been proposed by Ramamurthy.2 Thus,
in the transition state leading to PEII, oxygen interacts also
with the cation and one allylic hydrogen (from the methyl
group), because methylene hydrogens have an unfavorable
conformation. PEI leads to D abstraction from the anti allylic
methyl group, while PEII leads to the ene product formed
by hydrogen abstraction only from the syn allylic methyl
group. On the other hand, in the absence of the alkali metal
cation, a transition state leading to the formation of the
perepoxide on the more substituted side of the alkene is more
a Cation is omitted in the structure of PEII.
explain the regioselectivity in the intrazeolite photooxygen-
ation of the geminal dimethyl trisubstituted alkenes. We view
the reaction as proceeding through the intermediacy of an
irreversible perepoxide or an exciplex with the structural
(8) For the calculation of the loading levels, see: Zhou, W.; Clennan,
E. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 2915-2916.
(9) Jayathirma Rao, V.; Perlstein, D. L.; Robbins, R. J.; Lakshminarasim-
han, P. H.; Kao, H.-M.; Grey, C. P.; Ramamurthy, V. J. Chem. Soc., Chem.
Commun. 1998, 269-270. We used limonene rearrangements as a standard
(see ref 5).
(10) Gaussian 94, ReVision D.4; Frisch, M. J.; Trucks, G. W.; Schlegel,
H. B.; Gill, P. M. W.; Johnson, B. G.; Robb, M. A.; Cheeseman, J. R.;
Keith, T.; Petersson, G. A.; Montgomery, J. A.; Raghavachari, K.;
Al-Laham, M. A.; Zakrewski , V. G.; Ortiz, J. V.; Foresman, J. B.;
Cioslowski, J.; Stefanov, B. B.; Nanayakkara, A.; Challacombe, M.; Peng,
C. Y.; Ayala, P. Y.; Chen, W.; Wong, M. W.; Andres, J. L.; Replogle, R.;
Gomperts, R.; Martin, R. L.; Fox, D. L.; Binkley, J. S.; Defrees, D. J.;
Baker, J.; Stewart, J. P.; Head-Gordon, M.; Gonzalez, C.; Pople, J. A.
Gaussian, Inc.: Pittsburgh, PA, 1995.
(11) Becke, D. J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 98, 5648.
(14) For a review on cation-π interactions, see: Ma, J. C.; Dougherty,
D. A. Chem. ReV. 1997, 97, 1303-1325.
(15) Hoyau, S.; Norrman, K.; McMahon, T. B.; Ohanessian, G. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 8864-8875.
(12) Lee, C.; Yang, W.; Parr, R. G. Phys. ReV. B 1988, 37, 785.
(13) Barich, D. H.; Xu, T.; Zhang, J.; Haw, J. F. Angew. Chem, Int. Ed.
1998, 37, 2530-2531.
Org. Lett., Vol. 2, No. 10, 2000
1371