H. D. Bendorf et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 43 (2002) 7031–7034
7033
O
acylation of internal alkynes were generally obtained in
higher yield than those obtained from terminal alkynes
with the same cyclization trends as observed for the
alkene substrates (entries 6–9). The difference in yield is
attributed to the greater reactivity of the methylidene
products toward nucleophilic attack or dimerization as
compared to the more hindered ethylidene products.14
Comparison of entries 2 and 10 suggests that the system
is sensitive to the distance between the sulfur tethering
atom and the aldehyde. 1,1- and 1,2-Disubstituted alke-
nes do not undergo cyclization as illustrated by entries
11 and 12. However, substitution alpha to sulfur does
not negatively affect the reaction (entry 9). The failure
of substrates 13a and b (Scheme 4) to cyclize suggests
that coordination of the Lewis-basic tether atom is a
prerequisite for hydroacylation and that the choice of
heteroatom is crucial.
CHO
X
X
13
a, X = O
b, X = CH2
14
Scheme 4.
cyclooctenone product upon reductive elimination of
the metal.
Efforts in our laboratory have focused on exploiting a
chelation-assisted6 approach for the synthesis of
medium ring heterocycles (Scheme 2). The hydroacyl-
ation substrates, 5, are v-alkenals and alkynals that
possess a Lewis basic tether atom, such as sulfur.
Coordination of both the tether atom and the alkene or
alkyne to the metal center and oxidative addition of the
aldehyde, likely affords metallabicyclic intermediate, 6,
avoiding direct ring closure to medium ring metallacy-
cles. Subsequent insertion of the alkene or alkyne into
the RhꢀH bond and reductive elimination affords the
heterocyclic product. A series of sulfur-containing sub-
strates has been prepared and subjected to hydro-
acylation conditions affording dihydrobenzothiepinones,
dihydrobenzothiocinones, and related compounds in
moderate to high yields.7 The chemistry presented in
this letter offers a facile route into these ring systems
and is, to the best of our knowledge, the first example
of heterocycle synthesis via hydroacylation.
In summary, the results presented here demonstrate
that medium ring heterocycles can be prepared via a
chelation-assisted intramolecular hydroacylation, pro-
vided a suitable tether atom is present and correctly
positioned relative to the alkene and aldehyde func-
tional groups. Future work will explore the use of
functional groups other than sulfides to provide a tether
atom and expand the range of heterocycles available by
this methodology.
Acknowledgements
Acknowledgement is made to the donors of the
Petroleum Research Fund, administered by the ACS,
for support of this research. The GC–MS used in this
study was funded in part by the National Science
Foundation (DUE-0087767). The authors are indebted
to Dr. Chriss McDonald and Dr. Craig Merlic for
helpful discussions.
Scheme 3 is illustrative of the strategies used to prepare
the substrates. Lithium aluminum hydride reduction of
the commercially available 2-mercaptobenzoic acid, 9,
yields the air-sensitive 2-mercaptobenzyl alcohol, 10,
which can be stored under argon for several months
without appreciable decomposition.8 Alkylation on sul-
fur with the appropriate alkyl halide or mesylate fol-
lowed by MnO2 oxidation yields the hydroacylation
substrate.9,10
References
Hydroacylation experiments were run in methylene
chloride solvent with 5–10 mol% Rh(PPh3)3Cl at room
temperature. Reaction progress was monitored by GC
and reactions were normally complete within 4–12 h as
determined by the absence of starting material. Solvent
was removed in vacuo and the cyclized product purified
by silica gel chromatography.11
1. (a) Sakai, K.; Ide, J.; Oda, O.; Nakamura, N. Tetra-
hedron Lett. 1972, 12, 1287–1290; (b) Larock, R. C.;
Oertle, K.; Potter, G. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1980, 102,
190–197; (c) Campbell, R. E., Jr.; Lochow, C. F.; Vora,
K. P.; Miller, R. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1980, 102,
5824–5830; (d) Sakai, K.; Ishiguro, Y.; Funakoshi, K.;
Ueno, K.; Suemune, H. Tetrahedron Lett. 1984, 25, 961–
964; (e) Fairlie, D. P.; Bosnich, B. Organometallics 1988,
7, 936–945; (f) Fairlie, D. P.; Bosnich, B. Organometallics
1988, 7, 946–954.
2. (a) Imai, M.; Tanaka, M.; Suemune, H. Tetrahedron
2001, 57, 1205–1211; (b) Tanaka, M.; Imai, M.; Fujio,
M.; Sakamoto, E.; Takahashi, M.; Eto-Kato, Y.; Wu, X.
M.; Funakoshi, K.; Sakai, K.; Suemune, H. J. Org.
Chem. 2001, 65, 5806–5816; (c) Bosnich, B. Acc. Chem.
Res. 1998, 31, 667–674; (d) Barnhart, R. W.; Wang, X.;
Noheda, P.; Bergens, S. H.; Whelan, J.; Bosnich, B. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 1821–1830.
Experiments intended to establish the scope and limita-
tions of this reaction are summarized in Table 1.
Entries 1–5 suggest that the distance between the sulfur
atom and the alkene functional group is critical.
Homoallylic and bis-homoallylic sulfides (entries 1–3)
readily undergo hydroacylation to yield seven- and
eight-membered rings, respectively. Cyclization to give
either six- or nine-membered rings did not occur in the
case of the allyl and 5-hexenyl substrates (entries 4, 5).
The failure of the allyl sulfide to cyclize may be
attributed to competitive rhodium-mediated cleavage of
allylꢀsulfur bonds.12,13 Products from the hydro-
3. Tanaka, K.; Fu, G. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123,
11492–11493.