A R T I C L E S
Kadota et al.
Scheme 1. Retrosynthetic Analysis of Gambierol (1)
Scheme 2. Synthesis of the ABC Ring Segment 4a
would be constructed by a modified Stille coupling at a late
stage. Recently, we developed a convergent method for the
synthesis of polycyclic ether frameworks via the intramolecular
allylation of R-acetoxy ethers and subsequent ring-closing
metathesis.4i,l Upon the basis of this methodology, the key
intermediate, octacyclic ether 3, can be retrosynthetically broken
down into the ABC and FGH segments, 4 and 5.
a (a) (c-Hex)2BH, THF, 0 °C, then H2O2, NaOH, 95%; (b) (i) TEMPO,
NaClO, KBr, NaHCO3, CH2Cl2-H2O, 0 °C; (ii) 1,3-propanedithiol,
BF3.OEt2, CH2Cl2, -78 to 0 °C; (iii) TBAF, THF, rt, 86% (3 steps); (c)
ethyl propiolate, NMM, CH2Cl2, rt, 94%; (d) MeI, NaHCO3, CH3CN-
H2O, 50 °C, 94%; (e) SmI2, MeOH, THF, 0 °C, 98%; (f) (i) TBSOTf,
2,6-lutidine, CH2Cl2, 0 °C (ii) LiAlH4, ether, 0 °C, 92% (2 steps); (g) (i)
TEMPO, NaClO, KBr, NaHCO3, CH2Cl2-H2O, 0 °C; (ii) NaClO2, 2-methyl-
2-butene, NaH2PO4, t-BuOH-THF-H2O, rt, quant (2 steps).
Synthesis of the ABC Ring Segment 4. Synthesis of the
ABC ring segment 4 was started from the known bicycle 6,4h
corresponding to the AB ring system (Scheme 2). Hydroboration
of 6 gave the alcohol 7 in 95% yield. TEMPO oxidation of 7,7
protection of the resulting aldehyde as a dithio acetal, and
desilylation with TBAF afforded 8 in 86% yield. Reaction with
ethyl propiolate and N-methylmorpholine gave the acrylate 9
in 94% yield. The dithio acetal protection of 9 was removed
by MeI in wet acetonitrile to give the aldehyde 10 in 94% yield.
Construction of the C ring moiety was performed by using
Nakata protocol. Thus, treatment of 10 with SmI2 in the presence
of MeOH provided the tricyclic compound 11 as a single
stereoisomer in 98% yield.8 TBS protection followed by LiAlH4
reduction of the ester group gave the alcohol 12, which was
oxidized to the carboxylic acid 4 in quantitative yield.
primary alcohol with PivCl/pyridine gave 18 in 98% yield. Acid-
catalyzed acetal formation with the γ-methoxyallylstannane 19
followed by acetal cleavage with TMSI/HMDS furnished the
allylic stannane 20 in 81% yield.9 Reductive removal of the
Piv protection with DIBALH gave the alcohol 21, which was
oxidized with SO3‚py/DMSO/Et3N to afford the aldehyde 22
in 97% yield. Cyclization of 22 mediated by BF3‚OEt2 gave
the 6,6,7-tricyclic compound 23 in 99% yield as a single
stereoisomer.10 Ozonolysis of the olefin followed by reductive
workup, protection of the resulting 1,3-diol as a benzylidene
acetal, and selective desilylation of the primary alcohol furnished
24 in 86% yield. Treatment of 24 with 2-nitrophenyl seleno-
cyanate/Bu3P followed by oxidative work up gave the alkene
25 in 97% yield.11 Treatment of 25 with TBAF afforded the
FGH ring segment 5 in quantitative yield.
Construction of the Octacyclic Ether Framework. The next
task of the total synthesis was the construction of the octacyclic
framework. The carboxylic acid 4 and the alcohol 5 were
connected by Yamaguchi conditions to give the ester 26 in 94%
yield (Scheme 4).12 A series of reactions including desilylation
with TBAF, acid-catalyzed acetal formation with 19, and acetal
cleavage with TMSI/HMDS furnished the allylic stannane 28
in 77% yield. The ester 28 was converted to the R-acetoxy ether
29 via the Rychnovsky protocol. Thus, partial reduction of 28
with DIBALH, followed by treatment of the resulting aluminum
Synthesis of the FGH Ring Segment 5. Synthesis of the
FGH ring segment 5 is shown in Scheme 3. Reduction of the
known ester 134e having 1,3-diaxial methyl groups with LiAlH4
followed by protection with TBSOTf/2,6-lutidine gave the bis-
silyl ether 14 in quantitative yield. Hydrolysis of the benzylidene
acetal followed by selective tosylation of the primary alcohol
afforded 16 in 84% yield. Treatment of 16 with an excess
amount of allylmagnesium bromide in the presence of CuBr
gave the alkylated product 17 in 95% yield. Ozonolysis of the
olefin, reduction with NaBH4, and selective protection of the
(5) Fuwa, H.; Sasaki, M.; Satake, M.; Tachibana, K. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 2981-
2984. (b) Fuwa, H.; Kainuma, N.; Tachibana, K.; Sasaki, M. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2002, 124, 14983-14992.
(6) For a preliminary communication, see: Kadota, I.; Takamura, H.; Sato,
K.; Ohno, A.; Matsuda, K.; Yamamoto, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125,
46-47.
(9) Kadota, I.; Sakaihara, T.; Yamamoto, Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 3195-
3198.
(10) (a) Yamamoto, Y.; Yamada, J.; Kadota, I. Tetrahedron Lett. 1991, 32,
7069-7072. (b) Kadota, I.; Kawada. M.; Gevorgyan, V.; Yamamoto, Y.
J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 7439-7446.
(7) Anelli, P. L.; Biffi, C.; Montanari, F.; Quici, S. J. Org. Chem. 1987, 52,
2559-2562.
(8) (a) Hori, N.; Matsukura, H.; Matsuo, G.; Nakata, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999,
40, 2811-2814. (b) Hori, N.; Matsukura, H.; Nakata, T. Org. Lett. 1999,
1, 1099-1101. (c) Matsuo, G.; Hori, N.; Nakata, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999,
40, 8859-8862.
(11) Grieco, P. A.; Gilman, S.; Nishizawa, M. J. Org. Chem. 1976, 41, 1485-
1486.
(12) Inanaga, J.; Hirata, K.; Saeki, H.; Katsuki, T.; Yamaguchi, M. Bull. Chem.
Soc. Jpn. 1979, 52, 1989-1993.
9
11894 J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 125, NO. 39, 2003