Published on Web 12/14/2002
Opening of Tartrate Acetals Using Dialkylboron Bromide:
Evidence for Stereoselectivity Downstream from Ring Fission
Yvan Guindon,*,§ William W. Ogilvie,*,†, Jose´e Bordeleau,† Wei Li Cui,†
Kathy Durkin,‡ Vida Gorys,† He´le`ne Juteau,† Rene´ Lemieux,† Dennis Liotta,‡
Bruno Simoneau,† and Christiane Yoakim†
Contribution from the Boehringer Ingelheim (Canada) Ltd., Bio-Me´ga Research DiVision,
2100 rue Cunard, LaVal Que´bec, Canada H7S 2G5, Department of Chemistry, Emory
UniVersity, 1515 Pierce DriVe, Atlanta, Georgia 30322, Institut de recherches cliniques de
Montre´al (IRCM), Bio-organic Chemistry Laboratory, 110 aVenue des Pins Ouest,
Montre´al, Que´bec, Canada H2W 1R7, Department of Chemistry and Department of
Pharmacology, UniVersite´ de Montre´al, C.P. 6128, succursale Centre-Ville,
Montre´al, Que´bec, Canada H3C 3J7, and Department of Chemistry, UniVersity of Ottawa,
10 Marie Curie Street, Ottawa, Que´bec, Canada K1N 6N5
Received November 13, 2001 ; E-mail: wogilvie@science.uottawa.ca; guindoy@ircm.qc.ca
Abstract: Johnson-type acetals derived from dimethyl tartrate give, after opening with Me2BBr and cuprate
displacement, secondary alcohols with high diastereoselectivity (>30:1). The mechanism proposed for the
induction of diastereoselectivity is downstream from the ring fission. It implies a direct participation of the
Lewis acid as a source of nucleophile and the stereospecific transformation of the resulting bromo acetal
through an invertive and temperature-dependent process. The acetals are prepared by reaction of the
desired aldehyde with dimethyl tartrate. Removal of the auxiliary is accomplished through SmI2 reduction
or by an addition-elimination protocol using methoxide.
Scheme 1
The induction of stereogenic centers on acyclic molecules is
a topic of great research interest. The concept of using acetals
as chiral templates to achieve such an objective originated from
the seminal work of W. S. Johnson1 and was later extended
and enriched by the contributions of many other scientists.2-6
The opening of acetals is now a commonly used approach in
the synthesis of new molecules. A variety of reaction conditions
involving different types of acetals, Lewis acids, and nucleo-
philes have been considered. To date, three mechanisms have
* Corresponding authors. Y.G.: Telephone: (514) 987-5786. Fax: (514)
987-5789. W.O.: Telephone: (613) 562-5800. Fax: (613) 562-5170.
† Boehringer Ingelheim (Canada) Ltd.
‡ Emory University.
§ Institut e recherches cliniques de Montre´al (IRCM), Universite´ de
Montre´al, and University of Ottawa.
been envisaged for this process. The first mechanism proposed
was an SN2 process proceeding through a direct displacement
of the acetal/Lewis acid complex. In this mechanism, the Lewis
acid complexed selectively to the oxygen attached to the carbon
bearing the axial substituent (2, Scheme 1).1,2 Heathcock,
Bartlett, and Yamamoto,3 and then later Denmark4 and Davies,5
provided experimental evidence that an SN1 oxocarbenium ion
mechanism may be implicated in most instances. It was
suggested that a cyclic tight ion pair such as 3 might be present
in the transition state. In structure 3, the presence of tight ion
pairs produces facial selectivity during the approach of the
nucleophile. The third mechanism proposed involved a solvated
oxocarbenium ion such as 4 in a transition state leading to the
major product 5a, although the sense of diastereoselectivity in
this case was more difficult to explain.4
University of Ottawa.
(1) (a) Johnson, W. S.; Harbert, C. A.; Stipanovic, R. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1968, 90, 5279-5280. (b) Johnson, W. S.; Harber, B. E.; Ratcliffe, B. E.;
Stipanovic, R. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1976, 98, 6188-6193. (c) Bartlett, P.
A.; Johnson, W. S.; Elliot, J. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1983, 105, 2088-
2089. (d) Johnson, W. S.; Kevson, A. B.; Elliott, J. D. Tetrahedron Lett.
1988, 3757-3760.
(2) See, for example: (a) Denmark, S. E.; Wilson, T. M.; Almstead, N. G. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 9258-9260. (b) Alexakis, A.; Mangeney, P.
Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1990, 1, 477-511.
(3) Mori, I.; Ishihara, K.; Flippin, L. A.; Nozaki, K.; Yamamoto, H.; Bartlett
P. A.; Heathcock, C. H. J. Org. Chem. 1990, 55, 6107-6115.
(4) (a) Denmark, S. E.; Almstead, N. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 8089-
8110. (b) Denmark, S. E.; Almstead, N. G. J. Org. Chem. 1991, 56, 6458-
6467. (c) Denmark, S. E.; Almstead, N. G. J. Org. Chem. 1991, 56, 6485-
6487.
(5) Bull, S. D.; Correia, L. M. A. R. B.; Davies, S. G. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin
Trans. 1 1998, 2231-2233.
(6) (a) Sammakia, T.; Smith, R. S. J. Org. Chem. 1992, 57, 2997-3000. (b)
Sammakia, T.; Smith, R. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 10998-10999.
(c) Sammakia, T.; Smith, R. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 7915-7916.
9
428
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. 2003, 125, 428-436
10.1021/ja012530g CCC: $25.00 © 2003 American Chemical Society