followed by the introduction of the six-membered ring onto
the existing seven-membered ring.3a-g Our route entails
closure of the seven-membered ring with the existing five-
and six-membered rings connected at C8 and C11 by a C9-
C10 two-carbon linker, forming the complete tricyclic
skeleton (Figure 1).4
Scheme 1
As an initial effort for the total synthesis of 1, we have
demonstrated that a reductive ring closure of 2 afforded the
8-epi-guanacastane 3 in moderate yield. As noted in our
previous communication,4 we have used (S)-citronellyl
bromide to generate 2 due to the higher cost of (R)-isomer,5
which would give the opposite stereochemistry of the C8
quaternary carbon compared to that of guanacastepene A
upon carbene insertion. The decision necessitates the inver-
sion of stereochemistry at C8. We had hypothesized that this
seemingly difficult task could be accomplished by reposi-
tioning the double bond from C3-C4 to C6-C7 on a
compound that contains a psuedosymmetry plane that bisects
the C8 and C5 carbons of the C ring.
Herein we report two procedures to fix the stereochemistry
at C8 via indirect inversion. To explore the inversion at C8,
aldehyde 4 was selected as a branching point and constructed
in high yield based on procedures analogous to the ethyl
series of the previous communication.4 Addition of meth-
ylmagnesium bromide to 4 followed by oxidation of the
secondary carbinols (5 mol % RuCl2(PPh3)3, 2.5 equiv of
NMO, acetone, 25 °C, 3 h)6 gave a good yield of the
corresponding methyl ketone 5. Treatment of ketone 5 with
lithium(trimethylsilyl)diazomethane (Me3SiCHN2, n-BuLi,
THF, -78 to 25 °C) smoothly generated the cyclopentene 6
in 92%,7 which was oxidatively cleaved by a two-step
protocol (OsO4, NMO, THF-H2O; NaIO4) to the corre-
sponding keto aldehyde. Direct treatment of this unstable
keto aldehyde with KOH in MeOH at room temperature
delivered the expected cyclohexenone derivative 7 without
any complication (76% in three steps). Removal of the TBS
group from 7 (Bu4NF, THF, 25 °C, 98%) followed by
xanthate formation8 under our modified conditions (NaH,
THF, CS2; MeI, HMPA)9 gave the desired xanthate 8 along
with 9 (Scheme 1). The formation of 9 is the consequence
of competing enolization of the carbonyl group followed by
reaction of the enolate with CS2 and two molecules of MeI.10
Subsequent treatment of this inseparable mixture of
xanthates 8 and 9 with tributylstannane (Bu3SnH, AIBN,
toluene, 100 °C) yielded the desired cyclobutane ring-opened
product 10 in moderate yield (45-50%, 2 steps). Osmylation
of the more electron-rich double bond of 10 then smoothly
afforded a 5:1 diastereometic mixture of the diols 11 (Scheme
2).
Scheme 2
(3) (a) Dudley, G. B.; Danishefsky, S. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 2399. (b)
Dudley, G. B.; Tan, D. S.; Kim, G.; Tanski, J. M.; Danishefsky, S.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 6789. (c) Snider, B. B.; Hawryluk, N. A. Org.
Lett. 2001, 3, 569. (d) Magnus, P.; Waring, M. J.; Ollivier, C.; Lynch, V.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 4947. (e) Mehta, G.; Umarye, J. D. Org. Lett.
2002, 4, 1063. (f) Tan, D. S.; Dudley, G. B.; Danishefsky, S. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 2185. (g) Lin, S.; Dudley, G. B.; Tan D. S.; Danishefsky,
S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 42, 2188. (h) Gradl, S. N.; Kennedy-Smith,
J. J.; Kim, J.; Trauner, D. Synlett 2002, 3, 411. (i) Shipe, W. D.; Sorensen,
E. J. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 2063. (j) Nakazaki, A.; Sharma, U.; Tius, M. A.
Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 3363.
(4) Nguyen, T. M.; Lee, D. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 4033.
(5) (S)-Citronellyl bromide is ca. 3.5 times less expensive than (R)-
citronellyl bromide. Aldrich: (S)-citronellyl bromide $31.70/5 g, (R)-
citronellyl bromide $108.70/5 g.
(6) Baker, R.; Brimble, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1986, 27, 3311.
(7) (a) Ohira, S.; Ishi, S.; Shinohara, K.; Nozaki, H. Tetrahedron Lett.
1990, 31, 1039. (b) Ohira, S.; Okai, K.; Moritani, T. J. Chem. Soc. Chem.
Commun. 1992, 721. (c) Taber, D. F.; Walter, R.; Meagley, R. P. J. Org.
Chem. 1994, 59, 6014. (d) Ohira, S.; Sawamoto, T.; Yamato, M.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 36, 1537. (e) Taber, D. F.; Meagley, R. P.; Doren,
D. J. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 5723. (f) Taber, D. F.; Yu, H.; Incarvito, C.
D.; Rheingold, A. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 13285. (g) Taber, D.
F.; Christos, T. E.; Neubert, T. D.; Batra, D. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 9673.
(h) Mapitse, R.; Hayes, C. J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 3541.
The indirect inversion process of the C8 stereochemistry
was initiated by protection of the diol 11 as its acetonide
(73% from 10) (Scheme 3). With the diol protected,
introduction of a carboethoxy group at the C6 position (LDA,
3960
Org. Lett., Vol. 4, No. 22, 2002