10.1002/anie.201902265
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
COMMUNICATION
These experiments strongly support the proposal that the
Ce(IV) complex 7 is in equilibrium with a Ce(III) species and the
free DACO radical 4a. Metal-oxygen homolytic ligand
possibilities for the synthesis of metal complexes with interesting
dynamic behavior. Because the 2,3-diaminocyclopropenones can
be readily synthesized on scale and are easily diversified, these
compounds may offer new possibilities as redox mediators, redox
19
dissociation has also been seen in aminoxyl complexes;[
]
20
however, we believe this is the first example of the reversible
homolytic dissociation of a neutral oxygen ligand to a free radical
cation. This unusual behavior can be attributed to the unique
structure of the cyclopropenone, which is a proficient L-type donor
but with a stable one-electron oxidation state that can be
accessed by strongly oxidizing metals such as Ce(IV).
active ligands, and catalysts.
Acknowledgements
Financial support for this work was provided by NIGMS (R01
GM102611). M. R. acknowledges the National Science Foundation for
a Graduate Research Fellowship under Grant No. DGE-16-44869.
In conclusion, we have shown that 2,3-dialkylamino-
cyclopropenones undergo single electron oxidation to produce
persistent radical cations. These “DACO” radical cations have
appreciable spin-density on the oxygen atom and represent a
structurally distinct addition to the category of persistent radicals.
The ligand behavior of the DACO radicals appears to offer unique
Keywords: radical cation • O-centered radical • cyclopropenium
• oxidation • ligand dissociation
(1)
For selected reviews, see: (a) L. Tebben, A. Studer, Angew. Chem. Int.
Ed. 2011, 50, 5034; Angew. Chem. 2011, 123, 5138. (b) J. E. Nutting, M.
Rafiee, S. S. Stahl, Chem. Rev. 2018, 118, 4834. (f) K. J. Romero, M. S.
Galliher, D. A. Pratt, C. R. J. Stephenson, Chem. Soc. Rev. 2018.
Advance Article. DOI: 10.1039/C8CS00379C.
(9)
(a) Z. Yoshida, H. Konishi, Y. Tawara, H. Ogoshi, J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1973, 95, 3043. (b) C. Wilcox, R. Breslow, Tetrahedron Lett. 1980, 21,
3241.
(10) H. G. Roth, N. A. Romero, D. A. Nicewicz, Synlett 2016, 27, 714.
(11) (a) K. Mishiro, F. Hu, D. W. Paley, W. Min, T. H. Lambert, Eur. J. Org.
Chem. 2016, 1655.
(2)
(3)
R. B. Grubbs, Polymer Rev. 2011, 51, 104.
For examples, see: (a) D. H. R. Barton, V. N. Le Gloahec, J. Smith,
Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 7483. (b) C. Gentilini, P. Franchi, E. Mileo,
S. Polizzi, M. Lucarini, L. Pasquato, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009, 48,
3060; Angew. Chem. 2009, 121, 3106. (c) A. Acton, A. D. Allen, A. V.
Federov, H. Henry-Riyad, T. T. Tidwell, J. Phys. Org. Chem. 2006, 19,
841.
(12) I. Kaljurand, A. Kütt, L. Sooväli, T. Rodima, V. Mäemets, I. Leito, I. A.
Koppel, J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 1019.
(13) J. J. Warren, T. A. Tronic, J. M. Mayer, Chem. Rev. 2010, 110, 6961.
(14) We have found that 5a converts thiophenol to phenyl disulphide, which
likely occurs via H-atom abstraction because the oxidation potential of
thiophenol (1.51 V vs SCE) is far above that of the cyclopropenone 4a
(see ref Error! Bookmark not defined.), while the BDE of thiophenol is
only 78.5 kcal mol-1. See: F. G. Bordwell, J. P. Cheng, J. A. Harrelson,
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 1229.
(4)
(5)
G. M. Clore, J. Iwahara, Chem. Rev. 2009, 109, 4108.
(a) U. A. Nilsson, L.-I. Olsson, G. Carlin, A. C. Bylund-Fellenius, J. Biol.
Chem. 1989, 264, 11131. (b) J. B. Mitchell, A. Samuni, M. C. Krishna, W.
G. DeGraff, M. S. Ahn, U. Samuni, A. Russo, Biochemistry 1990, 29,
2802. (c) M. Lafon-Cazal, S. Pietri, M. Culcasi, J. Bockaert, Nature 1993,
364, 535. (d) E. Venditti, A. Scirè, F. Tanfani, L. Greci, E. Damiani,
Biochim. Biophys. Acta, Gen. Subj. 2008, 1780, 58.
(15) R. Weiss, T. Brenner, F. Hampel, A. Wolski, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl.
1995, 34, 439; Angew. Chem. 1995, 107, 481.
(16) For examples, see: (a) J. M. Hoover, B. L. Ryland, S. S. Stahl, J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 2357. (b) X. Xie, S. S. Stahl, J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2015, 137, 3767. (c) J. Liu, S. Ma, Org. Lett. 2013, 15, 5150. (d) C. Zhang,
N. Jiao, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 28.
(6) (a) Z. Zhang, P. Chen, T. N. Murakami, S. M. Zakeeruddin, M. Grätzel,
Adv. Funct. Mater. 2008, 18, 341. (b) K. Nakahara, K. Oyaizu, H. Nishide,
Chem. Lett. 2011, 40, 222. (c) F. Kato, A. Kikuchi, T. Okuyama, K. Oyaizu,
H. Nishide, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 10177; Angew. Chem. 2012,
124, 10324. (d) B. J. Bergner, A. Schürmann, K. Peppler, A. Garsuch, J.
Janek, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 15054. (e) B. J. Bergner, C.
Hofmann, A. Schürmann, D. Schröder, K. Peppler, P. R. Schreiner, J.
Janek, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2015, 17, 31769. (f) T. Janoschka, N.
Martin, M. D. Hager, U. S. Schubert, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55,
14427; Angew. Chem. 2016, 128, 14639.
(17) (a) J. A. Bogart, A. J. Lewis, S. A. Medling, N. A. Piro, P. J. Carroll, C. H.
Booth, E. J. Schelter, Inorg. Chem. 2013, 52, 11600. (b) B. D. Mahoney,
N. A. Piro, P. J. Carroll, E. J. Schelter, Inorg. Chem. 2013, 52, 5970.
(18) N. A. Piro, J. R. Robinson, P. J. Walsh, E. J. Schelter, Coord. Chem. Rev.
2014, 260, 21.
(19) For examples, see: (a) K. W. Huang, R. M. Waymouth, J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2002, 124, 8200. (b) T. R. Porter, J. M. Mayer, Chem. Sci. 2014, 5,
372. (c) S. D. B. George, K. W. Huang, R. M. Waymouth, E. I. Solomon,
Inorg. Chem. 2006, 45, 4468. (d) K. S. Chan, X. Z. Li, W. I. Dzik, B. de
Bruin, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 2051.
(7)
(8)
K. Komatsu, T. Kitagawa, Chem. Rev. 2003, 103, 1371.
(a) J. S. Bandar, T. H. Lambert Synthesis 2013, 45, 2485-2498. (b) F.
Gerson, G. Plattner, Z. Yoshida Mol. Phys. 1971, 21, 1027-1032. (c) R.
Weiss, K. Schloter Tetrahedron Lett. 1975, 16, 3491-3494. (d) R. W.
Johnson Tetrahedron Lett. 1976,17, 589-592. (e) C. S. Sevov, S. K.
Samaroo, M. S. Sanford Adv. Energy Mater. 2017, 7, 1602027 (2017).
(20) All X-ray structures have been uploaded to the Cambridge
Crystallographic Data Center: 5a, CCDC 1908362; 7, CCDC 1908363;
9, CCDC 1908364.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.