C. A. Faler, M. M. Joullie´ / Tetrahedron Letters 47 (2006) 7229–7231
7231
J. Org. Chem. 1991, 56, 1713; (d) Kalivretenos’st, A.;
Nakanishi, K. J. Org. Chem. 1993, 58, 6596; (e) Roe, E.;
Scanlan, J.; Swern, D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1949, 71, 2215.
2. Chakrabarti, J.; Hotten, T.; Pullar, I.; Tye, N. J. Med.
Chem. 1989, 32, 2573.
chlorides to the triphenylmethyl amides worked well in
most cases, it failed with several aminopyridines (12–
14). The bislithium amide of 3-amino- and 4-aminopyri-
dine succeeded in preparing these triphenylmethyl
amides in good yield. Accordingly, tertiary amides were
also produced (approx. 35% yield). The ease of synthesis
of these amides illustrates the value of this methodology.
3. Ooi, T.; Tayama, E.; Yamada, M.; Maruoka, K. Synlett
1999, 6, 729.
´
4. Faler, C.; Joullie, M. Heterocycles 2006, 67, 519.
5. (a) Kocienski, P. In Protecting Groups; Georg Thieme:
Stuttgart, 2004; pp 417–424; (b) Kunz, H.; Waldmann, H.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1984, 23, 71; (c) Friedrich-
Bochnitschek, S.; Waldmann, H.; Kunz, H. J. Org. Chem.
1989, 54, 751.
In conclusion, the synthetic utility of bislithium amides
was extended to include the aminolysis of allyl and benz-
yl esters. We have also demonstrated a facile, one-pot
synthesis of tertiary aromatic amides from unactivated
esters.
6. Restituyo, J.; Comstock, L.; Petersen, S.; Stringfellow, T.;
Rajski, S. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 4357.
7. Jozwiak, A.; Brzezinski, J.; Plotka, M.; Szczesniak, A.;
Malinowski, Z.; Epsztajn, J. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2004,
3254.
Acknowledgements
8. (a) Haridazan, V.; Ajayaghosh, A.; Pillai, V. J. Org. Chem.
1987, 52, 2662; (b) Ghiaci, M.; Bakhtiari, K. Synth.
Commun. 2001, 31, 1803.
9. Lai, Y.; Huang, L.; Lee, K.; Xiao, Z.; Bastow, K.;
Yamori, T.; Kuo, S. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2005, 13, 265.
10. Hadjeri, M.; Mariotte, A.; Boumendjel, A. Chem. Pharm.
Bull. 2001, 49, 1352.
We thank the NSF (CHEM-1030958), Wyeth and the
University of Pennsylvania for financial support. Addi-
tionally, a fellowship provided by the NSF (DGE-
0231923 005) aided this work. We are also grateful to
Dr. George Furst, Dr. Patrick Carroll, and Dr. Rakesh
Kohli for technical assistance.
11. Babu, V.; Vasanthakumar, G.; Tantry, S. Tetrahedron
Lett. 2005, 46, 4099.
12. Hey, D.; Leonard, J.; Rees, C. J. Chem. Soc. 1963, 5251.
13. Ikenoya, S.; Masui, M.; Ohmori, H.; Sayo, H. J. Chem.
Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 1974, 571.
14. Chattaway, F.; Orton, K.; Hurtly, W. Chem. Ber. 1899,
32, 3637.
Supplementary data
Experimental procedures and spectroscopic data for all
compounds are available. The supplementary data asso-
ciated with this article are available online in Science
15. Pentimalli, L. Tetrahedron 1960, 9, 194.
16. Couture, A.; Grandclaudon, P. Synthesis 1985, 533.
17. Compounds were purified by recrystallization or column
chromatography and isolated yields are reported. Ethyl
acetate/petroleum ether (40:60) and acetone/hexanes
(50:50) were typical solvent systems.
References and notes
1. For some examples, see: (a) Barrow, R.; Hemscheidt, T.;
Liang, J.; Paik, S.; Moore, R.; Tiu, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1995, 117, 2479; (b) Fellincer, L.; Audrieth, L. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1938, 60, 579; (c) Witzeman, J.; Nottingham, W.
18. The regiochemistry of the butyl group insertion was
confirmed by X-Ray crystallography.
19. Dothager, R.; Putt, K.; Allen, B.; Leslie, B.; Nesterenko,
V.; Hergenrother, P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 8686.