Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
Article
solvent, and the total volume was 0.6 mL. Sodium trimethylsilylpro-
pane-3-sulfonate (TSP) was used as an internal reference. Elemental
microanalyses for carbon, hydrogen, and nitrogen parameters were
performed using standard techniques by the Microanalytical
Laboratory, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Belgrade.50
(s, 4H, pz). 13C NMR (50 MHz, D2O): δ = 17.83, 54.52, 59.86, 153.44
ppm.
{[Pt(ibn)Cl]2(μ-pz)}Cl2 (5). Yield 35% (41.39 mg, 0.05 mmol).
Elemental analysis calculated (%) for C12H28N6Cl4Pt2 (FW = 788.36):
C 18.28, H 3.58, N 10.66. Found: C 17.84, H 3.63, N 10.47. 1H NMR
(200 MHz, D2O): δ = 1.42−1.48 (m, 6H, ibn), 2.66 (s, 2H, ibn), 9.13
ppm (s, 4H, pz). 13C NMR (50 MHz, D2O): δ = 25.96, 60.09, 63.61,
153.36 ppm.
The mononuclear platinum(II) complexes of the type [Pt(L)Cl2]
(L is en, 1,2-pn, ibn, dach, 1,3-pd, and 2,2-diMe-1,3-pd) were prepared
according to a procedure published in the literature.23−25 To
K2[PtCl4] (207.56 mg, 0.5 mmol) dissolved in 10 mL of water was
added potassium iodide (332.02 mg, 2.0 mmol), and the mixture was
heated at 50 °C for 5 min. Subsequently, an equimolar amount
(1equiv, 1 mmol) of diamine ligand (L) was added to the obtained
reaction mixture with heating (50 °C) and stirring continued for 30
min. All [Pt(L)I2]-type complexes were crystallized from water at
room temperature. The [Pt(L)I2] complexes were converted into the
corresponding aqua derivatives by treatment with 1.98 equiv of
AgNO3 according to a previously published method.51 The mixture
was stirred overnight at room temperature in the dark. In each case,
the formed solid AgCl was removed by filtration in the dark, and in the
fresh solutions of the aqua complexes an excess of potassium chloride
was added. The pale-yellow precipitate of [Pt(L)Cl2] complexes were
removed by filtration, washed with methanol and then ether, and air-
dried. The yield was between 80% and 90%. The experimental results
of the elemental analysis for C, H, and N parameters for all Pt(II)
complexes are in accordance with theoretical values calculated for
[Pt(L)Cl2] type complexes. These complexes were used for further
synthesis of the corresponding dinuclear platinum(II) complexes.
Synthesis of {[Pt(L)Cl]2(μ-X)}Cl2 Complexes (3−9). The
dinuclear platinum(II) complexes of the type {[Pt(L)Cl]2(X)}Cl2
(X is pyrazine, pz, or pyridazine, pydz) were synthesized by
modification of the procedure published in the literature.14,15,18,19
The mononuclear [Pt(L)Cl2] complex was converted into the
corresponding monodimethylformamide (DMF) complex [Pt(L)Cl-
(DMF)]NO3 by treatment with 0.98 equiv of AgNO3. To a solution of
AgNO3 (49.26 mg, 0.29 mmol) in 5 mL of DMF was added a
suspension of [Pt(L)Cl2] (0.30 mmol) in 10 mL of DMF. The mixture
was stirred overnight at room temperature in the dark. The
precipitated AgCl was removed by filtration, and the resulting pale
yellow DMF solution of [Pt(L)Cl(DMF)]NO3 was used as the
starting material for the preparation of the required pyrazine or
pyridazine-bridged platinum(II) complexes.
DMF solution of the X ligand (10.01 mg, 0.15 mmol) was added
dropwise to the solution of [Pt(L)Cl(DMF)]NO3. The mixture was
stirred at room temperature in the dark for 24 h. The solvent was then
rotary evaporated and the residue washed with ether. The crude
product was dissolved in a minimal amount of 0.5 M LiCl aqueous
solution. The obtained solution was left overnight in the dark. The
pale-yellow precipitate of dinuclear Pt(II) complex was removed by
filtration, washed with methanol and then ether, and air-dried.
Complexes containing six-membered diamine ring L crystallized
with two molecules of LiCl and two water molecules ({[Pt(L)Cl]2(μ-
X)}Cl2·2LiCl·2H2O) (7 and 8), which differs from complexes with
five-membered chelate ring (L) crystallizing in {[Pt(L)Cl]2(μ-X)}Cl2
(4, 6, and 9) molecular form. Depending of the type diamine (L) and
bridging (X) ligand, the yield of {[Pt(L)Cl]2(μ-X)}Cl2 complex was
between 35% and 40%. The purity of the complexes was checked by
elemental microanalysis and NMR (1H and 13C) spectroscopy. All
these data confirmed >95% purity of the tested compounds and were
in accordance with those previously reported for the same
complexes.20−22
{[Pt(dach)Cl]2(μ-pz)}Cl2 (6). Yield 32% (40.34 mg, 0.048 mmol).
Elemental analysis calculated (%) for C16H32N6Cl4Pt2 (FW = 840.43):
1
C 22.87, H 3.84, N 10.00. Found: C 22.56, H 3.94, N 9.56. H NMR
(200 MHz, D2O): δ = 1.27−1.62 (m, 4H, dach), 1.76−2.08 (m, 4H,
dach,), 2.45−2.61 (m, 2H, dach,), 9.00 ppm (s, 4H, pz). 13C NMR (50
MHz, D2O): δ = 26.55, 34.56, 63.61, 65.15, 153.31 ppm.
{[Pt(1,3-pd)Cl]2(μ-pz)}Cl2·2LiCl·2H2O (7). Yield 32% (44.94 mg,
0.051 mmol). Elemental analysis calculated (%) for
C10H28N6Cl6O2Li2Pt2 (FW = 881.12): C 13.63, H 3.20, N 9.54.
1
Found: C 14.80, H 3.03, N 10.07. H NMR (200 MHz, D2O): δ =
1.84−1.95 (m, 2H, 1,3-pd), 2.71−2.88 (m, 4H, 1,3-pd), 9.03 ppm (s,
4H pz). 13C NMR (50 MHz, D2O): δ = 29.83, 44.56, 45.66, 153.57
ppm.
{[Pt(2,2-diMe-1,3-pd)Cl]2(μ-pz)}Cl2·2LiCl·2H2O (8). Yield 30%
(42.18 mg, 0.045 mmol). Elemental analysis calculated (%) for
C14H36N6Cl6O2Li2Pt2 (FW = 937.23): C 17.94, H 3.87, N 8.97.
Found: C 18.04, H 3.72, N 9.17. 1H NMR (200 MHz, D2O): δ = 1.00
(s, 6H, 2,2-diMe-1,3-pd), 2.38 (2s, 2H, 2,2-diMe-1,3-pd,), 2.49 (2s,
4H, 2,2-diMe-1,3-pd,), 9.05 ppm (s, 4H pz). 13C NMR (50 MHz,
D2O): δ = 25.57, 36.14, 53.97, 54.99, 153.58 ppm.
{[Pt(en)Cl]2(μ-pydz)}Cl2 (9). Yield 40.0% (43.93 mg, 0.06 mmol).
Elemental analysis calculated (%) for C8H20N6Cl4Pt2 (FW = 732.25):
C 13.12, H 2.75, N 11.48. Found: C 13.16, H 2.98, N 11.19. 1H NMR
(200 MHz, D2O): δ = 2.78−2.82 (m, 8H, en), 8.14 (m, 2H, pz), 9.58
ppm (m, 2H, pz). 13C NMR (50 MHz, D2O): δ = 51.10, 137.33,
164.36 ppm.
Cell Viability Assays. Cell viability was tested by (3-(4,5-
dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) and
crystal violet (CV) colorimetric assays as previously described.52,53
Assays were carried out after 48 h of cell incubation in the medium
containing test compounds at concentrations ranging from 0.25 to 150
μM (including 0.5, 5, 50 μM). The results are presented as percentage
of the control (untreated cells) that was arbitrarily set to 100%. The
percentage viability values were plotted against the log of
concentration and a sigmoidal dose−response curve was calculated
by nonlinear regression analysis using GraphPad Prism software,
version 5.0, for Windows (GraphPad Software, CA, USA). From these
curves, IC50 values were obtained.
Gel Electrophoreses Study. The ability of 1−9 to cleave DNA
was examined by following the conversion of the supercoiled form of
pUC18 plasmid DNA (FI) to the open circular (FII) and/or linear
forms (FIII), using agarose gel electrophoresis.54 For the gel
electrophoresis experiments, pUC18 plasmid DNA (200 ng) was
treated with the cisplatin and Pt(II) complexes (50 μM) in buffer, and
the contents were incubated for 12 h at 37 °C, then subjected to
electrophoresis on a 1% (w/v) agarose gel containing 0.1 μg/mL
ethidium bromide in TAE buffer (40 mM Tris acetate/1 mM EDTA,
pH 7.4) buffer at 60 V for 2 h.
For the analysis of cellular DNA degradation, A375 cells (2 × 105
cells) were exposed to the concentrations equal to IC50 of cisplatin and
Pt(II) complex 7 and 9 for 48 h. The DNA was subsequently extracted
from the cells and analyzed by agarose electrophoresis (2% (w/v)
agarose gel in a TAE buffer (40 mM Tris acetate/1 mM EDTA, pH
7.4) at 60 V for 2 h) as described previously.19
Molecular Docking. In this work, the geometry optimization of
platinum(II) complexes has been carried out using semiempirical
quantum chemistry method (PM6),55,56 because of its excellent
compromise between computational time and description of electronic
correlation.57 The calculations were performed with the Gaussian 09
molecular package.58 The structure of B-DNA dodecamer
(CGCGAATTCGCG)2 (PDB code 1BNA)59 was used as a model
to study the interaction between the metal complex and DNA.60 The
{[Pt(en)Cl]2(μ-pz)}Cl2 (3). Yield 40.0% (43.93 mg, 0.06 mmol).
Elemental analysis calculated (%) for C8H20N6Cl4Pt2 (FW = 732.25):
C 13.12, H 2.75, N 11.48. Found: C 13.16, H 2.98, N 11.19. 1H NMR
(200 MHz, D2O): δ = 2.68−2.79 (m, 8H, en), 9.03 ppm (s, 4H, pz).
13C NMR (50 MHz, D2O): δ = 52.34, 153.46 ppm.
{[Pt(1,2-pn)Cl]2(μ-pz)}Cl2 (4). Yield 33.3% (38.02 mg, 0.05
mmol). Elemental analysis calculated (%) for C10H24N6Cl4Pt2 (FW
= 760.31): C 15.80, H 3.18, N 11.05. Found: C 15.45, H 3.19, N
1
10.82. H NMR (200 MHz, D2O): δ = 1.34 (d, 3H, J = 6.6 Hz, 1,2-
pn), 2.45−2.98 (m, 2H, 1,2-pn), 3.11−3.32 (m, H, 1,2-pn), 9.01 ppm
G
J. Med. Chem. XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX