2372
NAGIEVA
oxidation and H2O2 decomposition. The gasꢀphase ligand is much more stable to the destructive action of
region of freeꢀradical chain oxidation with hydrogen the oxidant than porphyrins. Therefore, oxidation
peroxide was successfully used for the synthesis of can be conducted in a static system for a prolonged
4ꢀvinylpyridine (VP) Nꢀmonoxide of a ꢀdeficient time. Two types of bioimitator were synthesized,
π
heteroaromatic compound [2]. However, all attempts which differed only in the valence state of the iron
to use this variant of simultaneous oxidation with ion. They were tested in simultaneous oxidation of
hydrogen peroxide to obtain thiophene Sꢀmonoxides as simple thiophenes in order to obtain a derivative of
π
ꢀredundant heteroaromatic compounds failed. Under thiopheneꢀ1ꢀmonoxide.
conditions similar to those for gasꢀphase Nꢀoxidation
with hydrogen 4ꢀVPꢀperoxide, Sꢀoxidation was not
observed; when taken in small amounts, 3,4ꢀdimethylꢀ
2,5ꢀdibromothiophene underwent oxidative destrucꢀ
tion (~4%), and the major reaction was decomposition
of H2O2.
The catalytic bioimitators were synthesized by the
Udenfried procedure [5], in which 1.75 M NH4OH
was added to an aqueous solution of 0.25 M Fe2(SO4)3
(Sigma Aldrich Chemical) (when the Fe3+ ion was
required at the active center of the catalyst) until
Fe(OH)3 completely precipitated. The solution was
filtered off and washed with hot water. The precipitate
was soluble in aqueous EDTA (Sigma Aldrich Chemꢀ
ical). The resulting sample was adsorbed by depositing
it on alumina.
To prepare a catalyst with Fe2+ at the active center,
aqueous EDTA was added to aqueous FeSO4, and the
resulting complex was deposited on Al2O3. Alumina
was used in neutral or basic form.
π
ꢀDeficient heteroaromatic compounds (such as
pyridine) easily undergo various freeꢀradical reacꢀ
tions, while ꢀredundant thiophenes are stable to freeꢀ
π
radical attack. In view of this property of thiophene,
freeꢀradical simultaneous oxidation with hydrogen
peroxide was replaced by a biomimetic catalytic proꢀ
cedure. It was necessary to synthesize a biomimetic
catalyst on which the catalytic decomposition of H2O2
could lead to an oxidative catalytic intermediate and
“active oxygen” would be an electrophile because
thiophenes readily undergo electrophilic reactions.
The apparatus was a threeꢀneck flask equipped
with a reflux condenser, a thermometer, a liquid samꢀ
pling tube, a stirrer, and a furnace for heating the reacꢀ
tor. The reflux condenser had an outlet (for gaseous
products) connected via a rubber hose to a gasometer.
Recently, a new field of catalysis has been develꢀ
oped to create catalysts of a new generation, namely,
soꢀcalled bioimitators that model the individual funcꢀ
tions of enzymes in conventional chemical systems.
They differ in the method for the synthesis of imitators
themselves and their functions, as well as the types of
biochemical oxidation reactions being modeled. One
of the successful models of oxidation (catalase, peroxꢀ
ide, and monoxygenase reactions) is PPFe3+OH (iron
protoporphin) deposited on alumina [3].
The products were identified and quantitatively
characterized by gas liquid and liquid chromatograꢀ
1
phy, chromatography–mass spectrometry, and H
NMR spectroscopy.
The following thiophenes served as substrates:
3,4ꢀdibromothiophene, 2,5ꢀdimethylthiophene, and
3,4ꢀdibromoꢀ2,5ꢀdimethylthiophene. The solvents
were acetone, methanol, and dichloromethane. The
oxidant was perhydrol of reagent grade.
These systems can be improved by modifying the
organic ligand of the redox center or replacing it with
simpler and more readily accessible organic ligands
with a similar action. This was implemented on a
PPFe3+OH/Al2O3 bioimitator, in which ethylenediꢀ
aminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) was used instead of
protoporphin for coordinating the Fe3+ ion [4]. The
choice of EDTA as an organic ligand was not accidenꢀ
tal. Thus, the wellꢀknown oxidative systems of Hamilꢀ
ton and Udenfried contain triꢀ and bivalent iron
bonded to EDTA. An analysis of the mechanism of
enzymatic processes involving hydrogen peroxide
(catalase and peroxidases) excluded reactions that
proceeded by the radicalꢀchain mechanism, which
had nothing in common with enzymatic oxidation. In
enzymatic catalysis, the catalytic redox centers are
involved in selective oxidation in a concerted way
together with acid–base centers. The new bioimitator
(catalyst) should possess acid–base and redox cataꢀ
lytic centers, on the one hand, and be capable of oxiꢀ
dation by the mechanism of coherent simultaneous
reactions, on the other hand. Moreover, in liquidꢀ
In all runs, the substrate (0.1 g) was dissolved in one
of the above solvents. Then perhydrol was added to the
solution of the substrate (S) in an amount correspondꢀ
ing to the molar ratio S : H2O2 = 1 : 1.5 or 2.0. The
mixture was loaded into a static reactor and heated to
50–55°C. A catalyst (0.1–0.150 g) was added to the
reactor, and a magnetic stirrer was switched on. At the
first stage, the reaction proceeded for ~5 h, whereupon
a sample was collected for analysis. The rate of oxygen
release was traced by the gasometer and decreased
drastically within ~5 h, which pointed to a low conꢀ
centration of H2O2. After that time, the catalyst had
the highest activity. The product yields were insignifiꢀ
cant, but clearly traced on mass spectra. Then the perꢀ
hydrol charge was increased tenfold to provide the
most favorable conditions for coupled oxidation. The
reaction was conducted for 1 day and more. Samples
were intermittently collected for analysis, which
showed that H2O2 was present and allowed us to judge
the activity of the bioimitator.
After two separations on a liquid chromatograph,
phase oxidation with hydrogen peroxide, the EDTA we isolated the probable basic product 3,4ꢀdibromoꢀ
RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY A
Vol. 83
No. 13
2009