4574
S. Kim et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 51 (2010) 4573–4575
Table 3
Here, we report the silylation of alcohols without additives un-
Recycling test for 1a
der mild conditions using hydrosilanes and a recyclable ruthenium
catalyst (Ru/AlO(OH) (1)). Notably, C–X bonds of haloaryl groups
survive under the conditions of the silylation,13 which are gener-
ally labile toward oxidative addition in transition metal-catalyzed
reactions. The ruthenium catalyst 1 is composed of ruthenium
nanoparticles entrapped in aluminum oxyhydroxide, and can be
easily prepared from readily available reagents through a simple
sol–gel process.14a We have shown its high activity in the dehydro-
1 (3.0 mol %)
OSiEt3
OH
Ph
+
HSiEt3
Ph
rt, toluene, Ar
Run
1
95
2
3
4
93
5
94
Yieldb (%)
93
93
a
The reaction mixture was filtered through a glass filter. The recovered catalyst
was washed with acetone, dried under vacuum for 3 h, and reused.
b
Determined by GC with an internal standard.
genation of alcohols and in the synthesis of a,b-unsaturated esters
through one-pot alcohol oxidation–Wittig reaction.14
The characteristic activity of 1 was observed in the silylation of
4-chlorobenzyl alcohol with triethylsilane (Table 1). Although
commercial Pd catalysts showed high activities in silylation,
dechlorinated products were competitively formed in substantial
amounts (entries 1 and 2). Commercial Ru catalysts showed che-
moselectivities for the silylation, but the activities were much low-
er than that of 1 (entries 3 and 4). The silylation using 1 was tested
in various solvents such as toluene, hexane, diethyl ether, and
dichloromethane (entries 5–8). Toluene was the best among the
solvents tested; (4-chlorobenzyloxy)triethylsilane was obtained
selectively in 91% yield using 3.0 mol % of Ru after 24 h at room
temperature under an argon atmosphere. The activity of 1 in hex-
ane was comparable with that in toluene, while those in diethyl
ether and dichloromethane were significantly lower.
Various alcohols were subjected in the catalytic silylation under
the conditions of the entry 5 of Table 1 (Table 2). The catalytic sily-
lation was effective not only for C–Cl bonds but also for C–Br, C–I,
and C–F bonds of haloaryl groups (entries 1–6). Aliphatic primary
alcohols were also successfully silylated (entries 9, 10, and 12).
The silylations with dimethylphenylsilane were faster that those
with triethylsilane (entries 11 and 12). However, our catalyst system
was not effective for the silylation using t-BuMe2SiH (entry 13).
Meanwhile, a secondary alcohol, 1-phenylethanol, was silylated
only in 30% after 24 h (entry 14). In a competitive reaction using ben-
zyl alcohol, 1-phenylethanol, and dimethylphenylsilane in 1:1:1.2
Table 2
Silylation of various alcohols using 1a
catalyst 1
+
HSiR'3
R-OSiR'3
Yieldb (%)
ROH
rt, toluene, Ar
Entry
Silane
HSiEt3
Product
Time (h)
24
OSiEt3
OSiEt3
1
2
91c,d
Cl
HSiEt3
24
88d,e
Cl
OSiEt3
OSiEt3
OSiEt3
OSiEt3
3
4
5
HSiEt3
HSiEt3
HSiEt3
24
24
24
87d,e
95c,d
87d,e
Cl
Br
I
ratio,
a
78:22 mixture of (benzyloxy)dimethylphenylsilane
90d,e
87
and 1-(dimethylphenylsiloxy)-1-phenylethane was obtained. tert-
Butanol and an electron-deficient benzyl alcohol, (4-nitro-
phenyl)methanol, were practically inert toward our catalyst system
(entries 15 and 16).
We tested the recyclability of 1 in the silylation of 2-phenyleth-
anol with triethylsilane. The solid catalyst was recovered by filtra-
tion. Even in the fifth run, the catalytic activity is almost the same
as that in the first use (Table 3).
In conclusion, we have demonstrated the silylation of various
primary alcohols with hydrosilanes and a recyclable ruthenium
catalyst under mild conditions without additives. The catalyst sys-
tem is effective for the silylation of alcohols having haloaryl
groups, and the C–X bonds survive during the silylation.
6
7
8
HSiEt3
HSiEt3
HSiEt3
24
24
24
F
OSiEt3
OSiEt3
85
MeO
Ph
9
HSiEt3
HSiEt3
24
24
95c
90
OSiEt3
10
C7H15
OSiEt3
OSiMe2Ph
11
HSiMe2Ph
18
95c
C7H15
Ph
OSiMe2Ph
12
13
HSiMe2Ph
18
24
87
Tracec
Acknowledgments
HSiMe2(t-Bu)
OSiMe2(t-Bu)
We are grateful for the financial supports from POSCO through
the STSC program and the Korean Ministry of Education through
the BK21 project for our graduate program.
14
HSiMe2Ph
OSiMe2Ph
24
30c
15
16
HSiMe2Ph
HSiEt3
24
24
Tracec
Tracec
OSiMe2Ph
Supplementary data
OSiEt3
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in
O2N
a
The reaction was performed on 1.0 mmol of alcohol and 1.2 mmol of hydrosi-
lane in 3.0 mL of dry toluene with 1 (3.0 mol % of Ru) at 25 °C under Ar atmosphere.
References and notes
b
Isolation yield.
Determined by GC with an internal standard.
Dehalogenated products were not observed.
c
1. Greene, T. W.; Wuts, P. G. M. Protective Groups in Organic Synthesis, 3rd ed.; John
Wiley and Sons: New York, 1999.
2. Lukevics, E.; Dzintara, M. J. Organomet. Chem. 1985, 295, 265–315.
d
e
5.0 mol % of Ru was used.