J. D. Walker, J. S. Madalengoitia / Tetrahedron Letters 56 (2015) 3786–3789
3787
Table 1
Synthesis of ureas
O
O
R2
R1
R2
R1
N
C
+
H2N
N
H
N
H
7a-f
Urea
Conditions
Yield (%)
7a: R1 = Bn, R2 = Ns
7b: R1 = i-Pr, R2 = Ts
10 mol % CuCl, DMF, rt, 20 h
NaH, THF, 0 °C
CH2Cl2, 0 °C
CH2Cl2, 0 °C
Toluene, reflux 4 h, pyridine
96
95
91
84
79
88
7c: R1 = Ts, R2 = n-hexyl
7d: R1 = Ts, R2 = Bn
7e: R1 = Bz, R2 = Ts
7f: R1 = Bn, R2 = Tf
NaH, THF, 0 °C to rt
The isothioureas were synthesized from known N-sulphonyl
S,S-dimethylcarbodithioimidates 8a and 8b.6,7 Reaction of 8a with
benzyl amine in methanol under reflux for 3 h afforded the isoth-
iourea 9a in 97% yield (Table 2). Isothioureas 9b and 9c were sim-
ilarly synthesized in 70% and 89% yields, respectively. In contrast,
N-Ts, N0-Bz isothiourea 9d was synthesized through deprotonation
of benzamide with NaH in THF, followed by reaction of the subse-
quent anion with 8a. We found the N-Tf S,S-dimethylcarbod-
ithioimidate 8b to be highly reactive such that the addition of
benzyl amine could take place at 0 °C in 30 min to afford the isoth-
iourea 9e in 75% yield.
Figure 2. Optimization of urea dehydration conditions.
With the synthesis of the urea and isothiourea carbodiimide
precursors in hand, we next turned our attention to exploring
methods for the dehydration of ureas. Several methods for the
dehydration of ureas have been reported in the literature.8–10 For
example, ureas have been dehydrated with the Burgess reagent,
CBr4/Ph3P, and TsCl, R3N.8–10 To the best of our knowledge, these
reagents have not been utilized to dehydrate ureas that possess
an electron withdrawing-group, let alone a powerful electron-
withdrawing group such as tosyl. To evaluate the dehydration
chemistry, rather than attempting to isolate a highly reactive N-
Ts, N0-alkyl carbodiimide, the dehydrations were carried out in
the presence of aza-norbornene 10 as a ‘trap’ for carbodiimide gen-
erated in the dehydration reaction.
phosgene. After addition of aza-norbornene 10, the reaction mix-
ture was allowed to warm to 0 °C. While the crude reaction mix-
ture looked clean by 1H NMR spectroscopy, the yield of
guanidine 11a after flash chromatography was only 45% and we
could not account for the mass balance despite various attempts
to modify the procedure. Finally, we attempted the dehydration
of urea 7d with phosgene and Et3N as the base in THF at 0 °C fol-
lowed by addition of aza-norbornene 10. This method at last
afforded the rearrangement product 11a in 71% yield after purifica-
tion. These conditions were subsequently applied to the dehydra-
tion of all ureas synthesized for this study (shown below).
The results that allow a comparison of the three different meth-
ods for carbodiimide generation (from thioureas, ureas and isoth-
ioureas) are summarized in Table 3. The data for carbodiimide
generation from thioureas with EDCI or the Mukaiyama reagent
have been previously reported,1,2 but is shown for comparison.
Overall, yields of bicyclic guanidine 11a were quite comparable
irregardless of whether the carbodiimide was generated from the
thiourea with EDCI, the urea with phosgene, or the isothiourea
with HgCl2. As for guanidines 11b and 11c, the yields are also com-
parable for all three methods, but the yields are slightly better
when the carbodiimide was generated from the thiourea with
EDCI.
The attempted dehydration of N-Ts, N0-Bn-urea 7d followed by
subsequent reaction of the generated carbodiimide with aza-nor-
bornene 10 is detailed in Figure 2. Neither the Burgess reagent,
nor CBr4/Ph3P afforded any rearrangement product when urea 7d
was subjected to these reagents in the presence of aza-norbornene
10. TsCl/Et3N did dehydrate urea 7d to some extent as the rear-
rangement product 11a was isolated in 30% yield. However, these
results signified that an alternative dehydrating method was
needed. We next attempted a one pot di-deprotonation of urea
7d with 2 equiv n-Buli at ꢀ78 °C followed by reaction with
Table 2
Synthesis of isothioureas
In stark contrast to the reactions noted above in which all meth-
ods for carbodiimide generation afforded rearrangement product,
the next set of reactions exhibited varied results. For example,
while the reaction of N-Tf, N0-Bn thiourea 12d afforded the guani-
dine 11d in 62% yield, the dehydration of urea 7f with phosgene
and the desulfurization of the isothiourea 9e with HgCl2 afforded
complex mixtures. We have found that the choice of solvent can
have a profound effect on the outcome of these reactions, but a
range of different solvents did not improve the reactions originat-
ing from urea 7f and isothiourea 9e. The next series incorporating
the Ns-group features only the dehydration of N-Ns, N0-Bn urea 7a.
The reactions originating from the corresponding thiourea and
isothiourea were not investigated since a search of the literature
did not reveal any N-Ns, N0-alkyl thioureas or isothioureas. We sus-
pect this is due to Smiles chemistry that is possible when using the
MeS
O
O
R1
R2
S
MeS
O
N
O
R1
N
H
N
R2
S
MeS
8a
NH2
: R = Ts
9a-e
8b: R = Tf
Isothiourea
Conditions
Yield (%)
9a: R1 = Ts, R2 = Bn
9b: R1 = Ts, R2 = i-Pr
9c: R1 = Ts, R2 = n-hexyl
9d: R1 = Ts, R2 = Bz
9e: R1 = Tf, R2 = Bn
MeOH, reflux, 3 h
97
70
89
51
75
MeOH, Et3N, reflux, 3 ha
MeOH, reflux, 3 h
NaH, THF, rt
MeOH, 0 °C, 30 min
a
Isopropyl amine hydrochloride was used instead of the free base.