procedure11 for conversion of an alkenylsilane to a bromo-
olefin for preparation of the chloroolefin 19. After several
attempts, we found that the addition of a catalytic amount
of water was important for the reaction to be reproducible.
Acidic hydrolysis of 19 gave 20 and subsequent Dess-
Martin oxidation afforded a labile aldehyde, which was
converted into the Z-conjugated ester 21 by using the Still-
modified Horner-Emmons reaction12 (60%, three steps). The
DIBAL reduction of 21 gave the allylic alcohol 22 (100%),
which was oxidized to a conjugated aldehyde. The asym-
metric aldol reaction13 with Corey’s sulfoxide 2914 provided
a hydroxysulfoxide,15 amalgam reduction of which gave the
desired hydroxy ester 23 (49%, three steps). The absolute
stereochemistry of the C-3 hydroxy group in 23 was
established by the modified Mosher’s method.16 After
acetylation, the protecting groups were removed to give the
dihydroxy acid 26 (92%, two steps), the primary hydroxy
group of which was protected as the TBDPS ether to afford
the seco acid 5 (47%, two steps). Thus, the precursors for
the macrolide unit 3 were in hand. However, all attempts at
macrolactonization of the dihydroxy acid 26 or the seco acid
5 to 3 failed under the Yamaguchi, Keck, and Mukaiyama-
Corey conditions.
which was oxidized to afford the conjugated aldehyde 4,
a precursor of the intramolecular Reformatsky-type reac-
tion, in 93% yield. Attempts toward the intramolecular
Reformatsky-type reaction are summarized in Table 1. The
Table 1. Intramolecular Reformatsky-Type Reaction of
Bromoester 4
(3S,4Z)/(3R,4Z)/(4E)
entry
conditions
SmI2, 0 °C
SmI2, -100 °C
Zn, B(OMe)3, rt
Zn, CuBr, Et2AlCl, -20 °C
Et2Zn-RhCl(PPh3)3
-20 °C
product
(yield)
1
2
3
4
5
37
37
37
37
37
-/-/100 (86%)
-/-/100 (7%)
b
-
-
-
c
b
6a
Et2Zn-RhCl(PPh3)3
-20 °C
35
20/72/8 (45%)
We next tried to cyclize the 14-membered ring using the
intramolecular Reformatsky-type reaction (Scheme 4). The
a After 4 h, Ac2O was added to trap the reactive product 37. b Complex
mixture. c Noncyclized reduced products were obtained: debromo-4 (65%)
and the corresponding debromo-allyl alcohol (23%).
Scheme 4. Synthesis of Haterumalide NA Methyl Ester 36a
17
cyclization with SmI2 provided the cyclic compounds in
good yields (86%, 3S:3R ) 1:1); however, the stereochem-
istry of the C-4 double bond was totally isomerized into trans
(entry 1). The reaction at lower temperature also gave the
same trans-products in a lower yield (entry 2). The molecular
mechanics calculation indicated that the desired cis-
compound 35 was less stable (7.5 kJ/mol) than the trans-
compound.18 This isomerization might be due to the allylic
radical nature of the transition state and/or the reactive
intermediates. Therefore, we investigated the cyclization with
zinc reagents apt to effect the two-electron reduction. The
reactions under the standard conditions19,20 afforded no
cyclized compounds (entries 3 and 4). The reaction under
Honda’s conditions21 with Et2Zn-RhCl(PPh3)3 resulted in
(11) Tamao, K.; Akita, M.; Maeda, K.; Kumada, M. J. Org. Chem. 1987,
52, 1100.
(12) Still, W. C.; Gennari, C. Tetrahedron Lett. 1983, 24, 4405.
(13) (a) Corey, E. J.; Weigel, L. O.; Chamberlin, R.; Cho, H.; Hua, D.
H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1980, 102, 6613. (b) Mioskowski, C.; Solladie, G.
Tetrahedron 1980, 36, 227. (c) Solladie, G.; Moghadam, F.-M. J. Org.
Chem. 1982, 47, 91.
(14) Mioskowski, C.; Solladie, G. Tetrahedron Lett. 1975, 3341.
(15) Diastereoselectivity of this aldol reaction was 95:5, and the mixture
could be chromatographically separated.
(16) Ohtani, I.; Kusumi, T.; Kashman, Y.; Kakisawa, H. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1991, 113, 4092.
a Reagents and conditions: (a) TMSCHN2, hexane-benzene-
MeOH (74%). (b) MMTrCl, pyridine (100%). (c) TBAF, THF
(99%). (d) BrCH2COBr, pyridine, CH2Cl2. (e) AcOH, THF-H2O
(82% in 2 steps). (f) Dess-Martin periodinane, CH2Cl2 (93%). (g)
(i) Et2Zn, RhCl(PPh3)3, THF-hexane; (ii) Ac2O (9%). (h) DDQ,
CH2Cl2-phosphate buffer (pH 5.9) (88%). (i) Dess-Martin perio-
dinane, CH2Cl2. (j) 2, CrCl2, NiCl2, DMSO (57%, 15S:15R ) 11:
1, 2 steps).
(17) (a) Tabuchi, T.; Kawamura, K.; Inagawa, J.; Yamaguchi, M.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1986, 27, 3889. (b) Molander, G. A.; Etter, J. B.; Harring,
L. S.; Thorel, P.-J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 8036.
(18) The calculations were executed by MacroModel (Version 6.0) with
the MM2* force field.
(19) Rathke, M. W.; Lindert, A. J. Org. Chem. 1970, 35, 3966.
(20) Maruoka, K.; Hashimoto, S.; Kitagawa, Y.; Yamamoto, H.; Nozaki,
H. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1980, 53, 3301.
hydroxy group of the allylic alcohol 22 was protected as an
MMTr ether to quantitatively afford compound 31. The silyl
group in 31 was removed, and the resulting alcohol 32 (99%)
was converted into the bromo ester 33. The MMTr group
was removed to give allylic alcohol 34 (82%, two steps),
Org. Lett., Vol. 5, No. 6, 2003
959