G Model
CCLET-5864; No. of Pages 5
D. Li, C. Zhang, W. Ding et al.
Chinese Chemical Letters xxx (xxxx) xxx–xxx
Both the absolute activity against the HIV-1 mutant (IC50 value)
and the relative activity (fold-resistance) were used to define the
resistance profile of the tested compounds. The results indicated
that most derivatives, including the lead compound DB02, lost
activity against the double mutant strain RES056, while four
compounds (5c, 5d, 5 s, 5 t) were more potent than the reference
drug DLV against the resistant mutant strain with the IC50 value of
11.68, 7.89, 9.84 and 4.39 mmol/L respectively (versus > 20 mmol/L,
DLV) and a fold-resistance ratio of 770, 243,108 and 66 respectively
(versus > 942, DLV). In this work, all compounds were also screened
for their inhibition against the replication of the HIV-2 strain (ROD)
in MT-4 cells, but none of them exhibited inhibitory activity at sub-
toxic concentrations, indicating that the novel series of S-DACO
derivatives were specific to HIV-1. Preliminary structure-activity
relationship (SAR) derived from these results was analyzed as
follows.
First, we focused our attention on the linker optimization at the
C-6 position of the pyrimidine ring. As we can see, methylation of
C-6 secondary carbon of the lead compound DB02 led to
compound 5c with similar potency (IC50 = 0.018
mmol/L) to
DB02 (IC50 = 0.020 mol/L), while the insertion of a carbon into
C-6 CH2-cyclohexyl substituted moiety of DB02 yielded compound
5 j, the increased length of the carbochain linker reduced the
m
Fig. 2. Predicted binding modes of selected compounds with RT (PDB: 1RT2). (A)
DB02 (carbons in yellow) with RT; (B) 5 j (carbons in magenta) with DB02; (C) (R)-
5c (carbons in orange) with DB02; (D) (S)-5c (carbons in slate) with DB02. Residues
involved in interactions are shown as green sticks. Dotted lines show the
interactions between HIV-1 RT and inhibitors.
activity about 5-fold (IC50 = 0.10
tion of the secondary carbon of the CH2CH2-cyclohexyl of the 5 j
gave the 0.09 mol/L inhibitor 5 s, which is as potent as 5 j but the
mmol/L). Subsequently, methyla-
m
cytotoxicity was increased about 8-fold. The above results of the
C6-linker optimization provided some support for our hypothesis
that introduction of a methyl group to the C6-CH2 linker would be
feasible and effective.
information). Binding modes of compounds 5c and 5 j in the
allosteric site of HIV-1 WT RT in comparison with DB02 were
present at Fig. 2. The location of compound 5c was different due to
the presence of C-6 chiral carbon (Fig. 2. C and D). Results showed
that compound 5c and 5 j had similar binding pattern with DB02 in
the NNIBP that the pyrimidine ring was stabilized by the hydrogen
bond between the 3-NH of the pyrimidine ring with the carbonyl
oxygen of Lys101. While the C-2 side chain extend in the same
direction, forming hydrogen bonds between the carbonyl oxygen
of the C-2 side chain and the NH group of the Lys103 backbone. The
interactions between 5c and RT were almost identical to that of
DB02 with RT, explains the fact that 5c and DB02 have the same
anti-HIV activity. On the other hand, the hydrogen bond between
compound 5 j and RT is weaker than that of DB02, so the activity of
compound 5 j is decreased by 5 times compared with DB02. The
C6-cyclohexyl group of the inhibitors is positioned in a hydropho-
bic sub-pocket formed by Try181, Try188, Phe227 and Trp229 and
develops additional interactions with the hydrophobic pocket.
Moreover, the C6-cyclohexyl group of 5c and 5 j is closer to Trp229
than that of DB02, because Trp229 is highly conserved, this
interaction is expected to be retained despite mutations in the
binding pocket, and this may be the reason why 5c retains potency
against the mutant strain compared to DB02. In particular, it can be
seen from Fig. 2. C and D, that the hydrogen bond between
compound (R)-5c and RT is stronger than that between compound
(S)-5c and RT (distances 1.66 Å and 2.10 Å vs 1.76 Å and 2.18 Å), and
the cyclohexyl group of compound (R)-5c is closer to Trp229 than
compound (S)-5c (distance 3.33 Å vs 3.86 Å). Therefore, we inferred
that compound (R)-5c had better anti-HIV activity than compound
(S)-5c.
Just as SAR studies on S-DABOs, the para substituents
(-F, ÀOCH3, ÀOH) of the terminal phenyl ring at the C-2 side
chain also had significant effects on the antiviral activity of these
novel S-DACOs. As shown in Table 1, introduction of a 4’-hydroxyl
group at the phenyl ring led to compounds 5f, 5 L, 5o, 5 r and 5 w
with slightly better anti-HIV-1 activities than their unsubstituted
counterparts 5e, 5 j, 5 m, 5p and 5 u. On the other hand, all of the
4'-fluoro-substituted compounds displayed decreased activities
comparing to their 4'ÀOCH3/OH/H-substituted counterparts.
Generally, the sequence of beneficial effects of the para sub-
stituents at the C-2 terminal phenyl ring on activity is as follows
decreasing order: OH > H ꢁ OCH3 > F. At the same time, it is worth
noting that the introduction of 4'ÀOH, 4'ÀOCH3 or 4'-F at the C-2
v-
phenyl ring led to increased cytotoxicity.
When tested against wt HIV-1, the compounds 5b, 5p, 5q and
5 r displayed low inhibitory activity andparticularly compounds
5 h and 5i almost lost their activity. With the insertion of a methyl
or ethyl group at the C-5 position of the pyrimidine, a marked
increase of anti-HIV-1 activity and selectivity index was observed
for all of the substituted compounds. Moreover, the influence on
activity of an ethyl substituent was obviously better than its methyl
counterpart. For instance, compounds 5c, 5 L, 5 j, 5k, 5 t and 5 s
(IC50 = 0.018, 0.05, 0.10, 0.14, 0.07 and 0.09
were more potent than their methyl counterparts 5e, 5o, 5 m, 5n,
5x and 5 u (IC50 = 0.08, 0.24, 1.72, 7.32, 0.93 and 0.35 mol/L,
mmol/L, respectively)
m
respectively). So, the order of activity of the C-5 substituents can be
summarized as follows: Et > Me > H, which is in agreement with
our previously reported results on the S-DACO series [26,27].
In conclusion, to extend the range of NNRTIs chemical
structures and overcome the issue of resistance, we designed a
series of oxophenethyl-S-DACO derivatives as potent new HIV-1
NNRTIs based on the molecular modeling of lead compound DB02
and using conformationally restricted strategy. The experimental
data indicated that most of the compounds showed moderate to
good anti-HIV activity with IC50 values in the range of 7.55–
Since the lead compound DB02 showed an IC50 of 0.28 mmol/L
against the RT enzyme and a similar dose-dependent pattern in
inhibiting HIV-1 RT activity with NVP [33], we inferred that these
newly synthesized compounds also acted as classical NNRTIs. To
better understand the activity and the interaction mechanism
between these compounds and RT, the selected compounds 5c and
5 j were docked into the NNRTIs binding pocket (NNIBP) compared
with DB02 using the AutoDock4.2 program (Supporting
0.018
mmol/L. Among them, the most potent HIV-1 inhibitor was
5c (SI = 12791), which was much more potent than the reference
4