6156 Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 2006, Vol. 49, No. 21
Letters
Figure 1. Surface diagram of the X-ray structure of SERBA-1
complexed to ERR (1A) and ERâ (1B).
(only two residue changes), significant binding selectivities have
been obtained using SBDD tools. In general, the approach has
followed a path of utilizing the conservative residue differences
between ERR and ERâ (M421(R) f I373(â) and L384(R) f
M336(â)) by targeting molecular design features that can
specifically exploit these changes. Inherent in this approach is
the fact that most molecules bind similarly in the ERR and ERâ
pockets.
We have recently solved SERBA-1/ERR and ERâ X-ray
cocrystal structures (Figure 1) and report significant differences
in the manner in which these molecules bind within the binding
pockets. The phenols in SERBA-1 bind in a predictable manner
in both structures. That is, one phenol (D ring phenol) is bound
within the glutamic acid-arginine network and the A ring phenol
is bound to the appropriate histidine. However, SERBA-1
displays a different orientation in these structures, which
corresponds to a (ca. 180°) rotation on its bisphenol axis.
Additionally, the A ring phenol, while bound to histidine in
both structures, locates to different sides of the imidazole
functionality for this interaction. This finding is unique and helps
explain the observed selectivity of SERBA-1. It also provides
a unique opportunity for SBDD that is not wholly tied to
exploiting the differences between two conservative residue
changes. We intend to report on our SBDD approach to
improved selectivities in due course.
We have recently developed a mouse model for the purpose
of evaluating ERâ agonist effects on mouse prostate while, at
the same time, measuring ERR-driven risks. It is known that
nonselective ER agonists can have indirect effects on prostate
involution by lowering serum gonadal hormone levels16,17 via
an ERR pathway. These R effects are also displayed in
regression of the testes and seminal vesicle (SV). We felt that
a potent SERBA would demonstrate involution of the prostate
(â effect) at doses that showed no R-related effects on testes
and SV. Additionally, we felt that there should be no effect on
circulating levels of the androgens testosterone (T) and dihy-
drotestosterone (DHT) at these doses. Our mouse prostate model
evaluates each of these endpoints after 7 days of oral dosing,
using intact vehicle, castrate, and finasteride controls.
The mouse efficacy data for SERBA-1 are shown in Figure
2. It should be noted that this molecule produces the desired
effect on prostate weight in a dose-response manner, while
having no effect on testes and SV weights in this dose range.
Additionally, SERBA-1 had no effect on T and DHT levels, at
up to 10× the minimum efficacy dose (0.1 mg/kg). It should
be pointed out that the nonselective ER agonist diethylstilbestrol
(DES), showed significant regression of prostate, testes, and
SV, while also lowering T and DHT (data not shown).18 There
were no doses where the DES effects were displayed only on
prostate tissue. Finally, the BPH drug, finasteride, a 5R-reductase
inhibitor, is known to exert its prostate regression effects by
inhibiting the conversion of T to DHT.19 Finasteride demon-
Figure 2. Effect of SERBA-1 on the prostate wet weight in CD-1
mice, measured after 7 days of oral daily doses. Prostate weights (PW)
were normalized to body weight (BW) and the quotient PW/BW (as a
percentage of intact control) is reported. Castrate and finasteride controls
are also shown. *Statistically significant (P < 0.05).
strated prostate involution in our mouse model, albeit at a
significantly higher dose (30 mg/kg).
In conclusion, we have shown that a potent and selective ERâ
agonist, such as SERBA-1, has unique properties in in vitro
studies and in rodent prostate models. We feel that these data
suggest an opportunity for this class of compound to show
efficacy in human BPH. Additionally, we have demonstrated
the value of SBDD in this benzopyran series and are optimistic
that these tools will allow for significant selectivity improve-
ments, which will be disclosed in subsequent papers.
Acknowledgment. We thank Gregory Stephenson for as-
sistance in the assignments of the absolute stereochemistry of
the enantiomers 7a and 7b.
Supporting Information Available: Atomic coordinates for
ERR and ERâ complexes with SERBA-1 have been deposited in
the PDB, with accession codes 2I0J and 2I0G, respectively.
Experimental details of the synthesis and characterization of
compounds 3-7, in vitro and in vivo assays, and X-ray crystal-
lographic procedures and statistics. This material is available free
References
(1) Katzenellenbogen, J. A.; Katzenellenbogen, B. S. Nuclear hormone
receptors: ligand-activated regulators of transcription and diverse
cell responses. Chem. Biol. 1996, 3, 529-536.
(2) Wallace, O. B.; Richardson, T. I.; Dodge, J. A. Estrogen receptor
modulators: Relationships of ligand structure, receptor affinity and
functional activity. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2003, 3 (14), 1663-1680.
(3) Palkowitz, A. D.; Glasebrook, A. L.; Thrasher, K. J.; Hauser, K. L.;
Short, L. L.; Phillips, D. L.; Muehl, B. S.; Sato, M.; Shetler, P. K.;
Cullinan, G. J.; Pell, T. R.; Bryant, H. U. Discovery and Synthesis
of [6-Hydroxy-3-[4-[2-(1-piperidinyl)ethoxy]phenoxy]-2-(4-hydroxy-
phenyl)]benzo[b]thiophene: A Novel, Highly Potent, Selective
Estrogen Receptor Modulator. J. Med. Chem. 1997, 40 (10), 1407-
1416.
(4) Kuiper, G. G. J. M.; Enmark, E.; Pelto Huikko, M.; Nilsson, S.;
Gustafsson, J. A. Cloning of a novel estrogen receptor expressed in
rat prostate and ovary. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1996, 93, 5925-
5930.
(5) Koehler, K. F.; Helguero, L. A.; Haldosen, L.; Warner, M.;
Gustafsson, J. A. Reflections on the discovery and significance of
ERâ. Endocr. ReV. 2005, 26 (3), 465-478.
(6) Couse, J. F.; Lindzey, J.; Grandien, K.; Gustafsson, J. A.; Korach,
K. S. Tissue distribution and quantitative analysis of estrogen
receptor-alpha (ERR) and estrogen receptor-beta (ERâ) messenger
ribonucleic acid in the wild-type and ERalpha-knockout mouse.
Endocrinology 1997, 138, 4613-4621.
(7) Norman, B. H.; Richardson, T. I.; Krishnan, V.; Dodge, J. A.; Lugar,
C. W.; Wang, Y.; Chen, K.; Durst, G. L.; Barr, R. J.; Montrose-
Rafizadeh, C.; Osborne, H. E.; Mo, H. Benzopyrans are selective