74
S.-L. Wang, J.-M. Lin / Chemical Physics Letters 444 (2007) 71–75
low T.
high T.
the excited-state deaggregation, as suggested in Scheme 2,
and the polarity inside denatured BSA is similar with the
monomer located inside the aggregate. Second, the emis-
sion spectrum of 6-Cl-2-StQ-NMe2 after incorporation into
denatured BSA also displayed a fine structure. Noncova-
lent protein–fluorophore interactions can occur by different
physical mechanisms, including hydrophobic interactions,
electrostatic interactions and hydrogen bonding [20].
Although the exact nature of these interactions is difficult
to determine in our system, the existence of an interaction
restricted the motion of 6-Cl-2-StQ-NMe2, and the rigid
environment around 6-Cl-2-StQ-NMe2 produced a struc-
tured emission spectrum.
420
460
500
540
580
620
Wave length (nm)
Fig. 5. The normalized emission spectra of compound 6-Cl-2-StQ-NMe2
(2.0 · 10ꢀ5 M) with 0.04% BSA as a function of temperature in aqueous
solution (EXC = 350 nm). Insert figure: the relation between temperature
and emission intensity k468 nm (EXC = 350 nm).
4. Conclusion
The emission maxima of compound 6-Cl-2-StQ-NMe2,
possessing ICT characters, correlate excellently with the
static polarity of the environment. In an aqueous solution,
6-Cl-2-StQ-NMe2 formed an ‘H type’ aggregate. Upon
photoexcitation, a deaggregation reaction in the excited
state was observed because of a larger charge separation
occurring in the excited-state disfavored the H-aggregate.
6-Cl-2-StQ-NMe2 is an excellent biosensor in monitoring
the content of protein and the conformational change in
thermal denaturation process. The detection limit of the
BSA concentration was found to be 40 lg/ml, and a con-
formational change was observed beyond 60 ꢀC for BSA
in the thermal denaturation reaction.
shown in Fig. 5. At room temperature, 6-Cl-2-StQ-NMe2
displays a structured fluorescence with the maximum
located at 468 nm. As temperature increases, a new struc-
tured fluorescence with the maximum located at 499 nm
appears. The inserted figure in Fig. 5 is the plot of the emis-
sion intensities (after normalization) at 468 nm vs. the solu-
tion temperature. This clearly indicates a dramatic change
in the emission intensity occurring above 60 ꢀC.
In a previous work, the denaturation temperature of
BSA was recorded using Fourier transform infrared
(FTIR) spectroscopy. The secondary structure of BSA
exhibited an obvious change beyond 60 ꢀC in the heating
process [26]. Therefore, we concluded that the emission
intensity change that occurred beyond 60 ꢀC was from
the denaturation of BSA. Since the emission maxima dis-
play a red-shift after denaturation, we conclude the polar-
ity inside BSA increase after denaturation.
Acknowledgement
Financial support from the National Science Council is
acknowledged.
References
Globular proteins with quaternary structures dissociate
before being denatured [27]. In addition to the disruption
of noncovalent bonds, there is more exposure of the thiol
and hydrophobic groups, which were previously buried,
to the aqueous medium. This consequential exposure of
the hydrophobic core of the molecule into an aqueous envi-
ronment results in a polarity increase around the probe (6-
Cl-2-StQ-NMe2) molecules.
Two important results need to be mentioned in Fig. 5.
First, the absorption maximum of 6-Cl-2-StQ-NMe2 after
incorporation into denatured BSA is located at 400 nm, a
typical absorption of monomer molecule. Therefore, it
was considered that the addition of a protein broke the
assembled structure of the aggregate of 6-Cl-2-StQ-
NMe2. The emission spectrum of 6-Cl-2-StQ-NMe2 after
incorporation into denatured BSA was similar with the
emission spectrum of the aggregate in an aqueous solution.
Since only a monomer molecules exists inside denatured
BSA, this concludes that the emission spectrum of an
aggregate in an aqueous solution is from the emission of
monomer species. This result confirms the occurrence of
[1] C. Sun, J. Yang, L. Li, X. Wu, Y. Liu, S. Liu, J. Chromatogr. B 803
(2004) 173.
[2] A.P. Demchenko, Anal. Biochem. 343 (2005) 1.
[3] S.L. Wang, T.I. Ho, J. Photochem. Photobiol., A 135 (2000) 119.
[4] S.L. Wang, G.-Y. Gao, T.-I. Ho, L.-Y. Yang, Chem. Phys. Lett. 415
(2005) 217.
[5] S.L. Wang, T.-W. Yeh, T.-I. Ho, Chem. Phys. Lett. 418 (2005) 418,
393.
[6] R. Das, D. Guha, S. Mitra, S. Kar, S. Lahiri, S. Mukherjee, J. Phys.
Chem. A 101 (1997) 4042.
[7] Y. Suzuki, K. Yokoyama, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127 (2005) 17799.
[8] A. Sarkar, S. Chakravorti, Chem. Phys. Lett. 235 (1995) 195.
[9] X.-K. Jiang, Acc. Chem. Res. 21 (1988) 362.
[10] F.H. Quina, E.A. Lissi, Acc. Chem. Res. 37 (2004) 703.
[11] D. Horn, J. Rieger, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 40 (2001) 4330.
[12] Y.-B. Jiang, M.-G. Jin, L.-R. Lin, Spectrochim. Acta, Part A 54
(1998) 1927.
[13] B.-K. An, S.-K. Kwon, S.-D. Jung, S.Y. Park, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 124
(2002) 14410.
[14] S.L. Wang, T.C. Lee, T.I. Ho, J. Photochem. Photobiol., A 151
(2002) 21.
[15] M. Kasha, H.R. Rawls, M.A. El-Bayoumi, Pure Appl. Chem. 11
(1965) 371.
[16] C.A. Hunter, J.K.M. Sanders, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 112 (1990) 5525.