.
Angewandte
Communications
agent and an oxidant at different stages in the catalytic cycle
(Scheme 1d).
entry 9). 4-Ethyl-1,1’-biphenyl (3a) was formed at room
temperature along with traces of the benzylic alcohol 4a
(Table 1, entry 14). Pleasingly, the ratio of iPr3SiH could be
reduced to 1.5 equivalents with a beneficial effect on product
formation (Table 1, entry 10). The conversion of 1a into 2a
remained low with 1.5 equivalents of Selectfluor but was
improved with an excess of N-F reagent (Table 1, entries 11
and 12). At this point, Et3SiH was found to be better suited
than iPr3SiH (Table 1, entry 13). Amongst the palladium
catalysts tested (Table 1, entries 15–17), [Pd(PPh3)4] was
superior, thus allowing full conversion of 1a into 2a. Pd-
(OAc)2, [PdCl2(MeCN)2], and [Pd(dba)2] all led to 2a along
with 3a. Benzylic chlorination was detectable (3%) with
[PdCl2(MeCN)2] but acetoxylation was not observed with
Pd(OAc)2. In the absence of a catalyst or of Et3SiH, 1a was
recovered along with trace amounts of 4a (Table 1, entries 18
and 19). During the course of this study a vicinal fluoroamide,
resulting from Ritter-type functionalization, was not typically
detected.[12] Under the optimized reaction conditions the
palladium-catalyzed reaction of 1a with 3 equivalents of
Selectfluor and 1.5 equivalents of Et3SiH in MeCN (0.025m)
at 08C afforded 2a in 69% yield as a single regioisomer
(Table 1, entry 13).
In our initial experiments,[11] we focused on the reactivity
of 4-vinylbiphenyl (1a) and examined a range of palladium
catalysts combined with various fluorine and hydride sources
(Table 1). Selectfluor emerged as the most suitable fluorina-
tion reagent when used in the presence of iPr3SiH and
10 mol% of [Pd(PPh3)4] in acetonitrile at 08C (Table 1,
entry 1). Selectfluor bis(triflate) was as efficient as Selectfluor
bis(tetrafluoroborate) (Table 1, entry 2). N-Fluorobenzene-
sulfonimide, N-fluoropentachloropyridinium triflate, and
XeF2 were less effective fluorine sources as these reagents
led preferentially to the reduced product 4-ethyl-1,1’-biphenyl
(3a; Table 1, entries 3–5). The formation of 3a was also
observed when iPr3SiH was replaced with PhSiH3 or with
NaBH4 (Table 1, entries 6 and 7). Bu3SnH gave mainly
starting material with only trace amounts of 2a (Table 1,
entry 8). These results indicate that product formation is
favored with the most reactive hydride source.[12] The reaction
concentration and temperature were important parameters,
with hydrofluorination best performed at 08C and lower
substrate concentration (0.025m instead of 0.05m; Table 1,
The substrate scope proved quite general, with various
vinylarenes and disubstituted alkenylarenes participating
effectively in the hydrofluorination reaction (Scheme 2). All
the reactions of terminal as well as 1,1- and 1,2-disubstituted
alkenylfluorides are regiospecific for benzyl fluoride forma-
tion. The electronic nature of the aryl motif is important with
electron-neutral or electron-withdrawing groups leading to
isolated benzylic fluorides with the highest yields (up to
99%). The method tolerates a wide range of functional
groups including ether, amide, ester, sulfonamide, fluoro,
bromo, alkyl, and trifluoromethyl groups. The method
permits the installation of a fluorine substituent at a quater-
nary benzylic position as illustrated by the successful synthesis
of 2p (65%). However, the homologous but-1-en-2-ylben-
zene gives approximately 10% yield.[11,14] The method gave
access to 2u and 2v, two compounds that possess three
Table 1: Hydrofluorination of 1a.[a]
Entry
[Pd][b]
F
H
Source
Conv.
[%][d]
Yield [%][d]
2a 3a
Source[c]
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
A
B
C
iPr3SiH
iPr3SiH
iPr3SiH
iPr3SiH
iPr3SiH
PhSiH3
NaBH4
Bu3SnH
iPr3SiH
iPr3SiH[g]
iPr3SiH[g]
iPr3SiH[g]
Et3SiH[g]
Et3SiH[g]
Et3SiH[g]
Et3SiH[g]
Et3SiH[g]
Et3SiH[g]
–
>95
>95
25
>95
72
>95
>95
9
>95
>95
37
>95
>95
>95
>95
>95
92
30
0
0
34
11
0
16
0
18
<5
35
41
22
54
69
48
27
38
31
0
12
23
28
31
48
0
0
0
0
0
D
E[e]
A
A
A
A
A
9[f]
10[f]
11[f]
12[f]
13[f]
14[f,j]
15[f]
16[f]
17[f]
18[f]
19[f]
benzylic positions, and are not accessible by direct benzylic
[9]
À
A[h]
A[i]
A[i]
A[i]
A[i]
A[i]
A[i]
A[i]
A[i]
C H activation/fluorination or by applying the iron(III)-
mediated or cobalt-catalyzed hydrofluorinations previously
reported.[4,5] Pleasingly, (E)- and (Z)-2-benzylidene-3-meth-
ylbutan-1-ol (1x) gave anti-2x and syn-2x, respectively, in
good yields and with a d.r value of greater than 20:1. This
result implies that the hydrofluorination is cis specific.[15]
A proposed catalytic cycle that explains the need for
excess Selectfluor in the hydrofluorination reaction is pre-
sented in Scheme 3. Initial oxidation of the precatalyst gives
the electrophilic PdII species Awhich activates the silane, thus
giving access to the PdII hydride species B, which in turn
effects reversible syn hydropalladation to the alkenylarene to
afford the h3-benzyl complex C. Electrophilic fluorination of
C with Selectfluor affords the PdIVF dication D (or its h3-
complex). Reductive elimination then forms generic product
E, and regenerates A.
0
15
10
12
16
0
II
III
IV
–
I
10
<5
0
0
[a] Reaction conditions: 1a (18 mg), MeCN (2 mL), fluorine source
(2.0 equiv), hydride source (2.0 equiv), 08C, 2 h. [b] I=[Pd(PPh3)4],
II=Pd(OAc)2, III=PdCl2(MeCN)2, IV=[Pd(dba)2]. [c] A=Selectfluor
bis(tetrafluoroborate) [(1-chloromethyl-4-fluoro-1,4-diazoniabicyclo-
[2.2.2]octane bis(tetrafluoroborate), B=Selectfluor bis(triflate), C=N-
fluorobenzenesulfonimide (NFSI), D=N-fluoropentachloropyridinium
1
triflate, E=XeF2. [d] Determined by H NMR spectroscopy by peak
integration using 1-fluoro-3-nitrobenzene as an internal reference.
[e] Reaction performed in CH2Cl2 (2 mL). [f] 4 mL of solvent. [g] 1.5 equiv
of iPr3SiH (or with 1.5 equiv of Et3SiH). [h] 1.5 equiv of Selectfluor
bis(tetrafluoroborate). [i] 3 equiv of Selectfluor bis(tetrafluoroborate).
[j] Reaction performed at RT.
This mechanism is supported by the various experiments
described in Scheme 4. The hydrofluorination of 1b with
Et3SiD leads to (2-2H)-2b and confirms that this reagent
4182
ꢀ 2014 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 4181 –4185