2332 Organometallics, Vol. 28, No. 7, 2009
Bonnet et al.
400 MHz spectrometer; 31P{1H} (121.5 MHz) and 19F (376 MHz)
NMR spectra were recorded on a Varian INOVA 400 MHz
spectrometer. Chemical shift values are reported in ppm (δ) relative
to Me4Si (1H and 13C NMR). MALDI-TOF measurements were
carried out on an Applied Biosystems Voyager DE-STR MALDI-
TOF MS. Elemental analyses were performed by H. Kolbe
Microanalysis Laboratories, Mu¨lheim, Germany. GC analyses were
performed on a Perkin-Elmer Clarus-500 gas chromatograph. GC-
MS measurements were measured on a Perkin-Elmer Autosys-
temXL gas chromatograph with an attached Perkin-Elmer Turbo-
mass Upgrade mass spectrometer. For column chromatography,
Merck silica gel 60 (230-400 mesh) was used. All standard
reagents were purchased from Acros Organics or Sigma-Aldrich,
and used as received. para-Phenyl NCN-pincer ligand 7,57 pincer
metal complexes 158 and 2,13 and ruthenated derivatives [9]+,29
[3]+, and [4]+ 26 were prepared according to literature procedures.
DIRDIF9963 and was refined on F2 with SHELXL-97.64 The
temperature of the data collection was controlled using the Oxford
Cryostream 600 system (manufactured by Oxford Cryosystems).
The H-atoms were placed at calculated positions (AFIX 23, AFIX
43, or AFIX 137) with isotropic displacement parameters having
values 1.2 or 1.5 times Ueq of the attached C-atom. Illustrations
and structure validations were done with PLATON.65
Crystal Growth. A dichloromethane solution of the complex
(5 mg/mL) was put in an open 2 mL vial, which was contained in
a closed 20 mL vial. The larger vial contained about 6 mL of
hexane. As vapor diffusion took place, crystal growth occurred at
room temperature without any additional effort, and crystals
appeared at the bottom of the smaller vial after one to two weeks.
X-ray structure data for [5]+: C28H38ClN2PdRu · BF4, Mr ) 732.33,
3
j
colorless plate, 0.46 × 0.18 × 0.06 mm , triclinic, P1 (no. 2), a )
14.1334(5) Å, b ) 14.7569(5) Å, c ) 16.1141(6) Å, R )
78.019(2)°, ꢀ ) 77.718(2)°, γ ) 63.285(2)°, V ) 2909.14(18) Å3,
Z ) 4, Dx ) 1.672 g cm-3, µ ) 1.27 mm-1; 41 951 reflections
were measured at 150(2) K after the crystal had been flash-cooled
from room temperature. Multiscan empirical absorption corrections
8: A 1.69 g amount of ligand 7 (5.78 mmol) was weighed in a
flame-dried Schlenk flask and put under a nitrogen atmosphere.
Then 40 mL of dry pentane was added, and the solution was cooled
to -78 °C. A 3.5 mL amount of n-BuLi (as 1.6 M solution in
hexanes, 5.6 mmol) was added dropwise to give an orange solution,
which was stirred at -78 °C for 30 min. The cooling bath was
then removed, and the solution warmed to room temperature
overnight (18 h) to yield a yellowish suspension. Pentane was
evaporated, replaced by 100 mL of dry diethyl ether, the suspension
was cooled to -78 °C, and 1.96 g of PdCl2(SEt2)2 (5.49 mmol)
was slowly added under a flow of dinitrogen. The suspension was
stirred 1 h at -78 °C, then allowed to warm to room temperature
overnight (24 h) under nitrogen. Diethyl ether was evaporated, and
the crude material was dissolved in 200 mL of dichloromethane,
washed with water and brine, dried over MgSO4, and filtered over
Celite. Addition of 100 mL of hexane and slow evaporation of
CH2Cl2 afforded 1.48 g of crystalline product (62%). Characteriza-
tion was identical to the published data.20
[5]+: A 159 mg amount of 8 (388 µmol) was weighed in a dry
Schlenk flask and put under inert atmosphere. A solution of
[RuCp*(MeCN)3](BF4)59 (174 mg, 389 µmol) in 5 mL of dry
dichloromethane was added, and the mixture stirred under nitrogen
at room temperature for 3 days. The crude solution was put on top
of an 80 mL silica gel column and eluted with CH2Cl2 containing
1-3% methanol to remove unreacted starting materials. Yield: 229
mg of [5](BF4) as a whitish powder (81%). 1H NMR δ (400 MHz,
ppm in acetone-d6): 7.31 (s, 2H, m), 6.54 (d, 2H, o′, J 5.9), 6.16 (t,
2H, m′, J 6.2), 6.11 (t, 1H, p′, J 5.7), 4.20 (s, 4H, CH2N), 2.92 (s,
12H, NMe2), 1.89 (s, 15H, C5Me5). 13C NMR δ (100 MHz, ppm
in acetone-d6): 162.2 (i), 147.6 (o), 129.5 (p), 119.3 (m), 103.5
(i′), 97.1 (CIV5R5), 88.4, 88.2, 85.4 (o′, m′, p′), 75.3 (CH2N), 53.2
(NMe2), 10.3 (C5Me5). 19F NMR δ (376 MHz, ppm in acetone-d6):
-152.1 (s). MALDI-TOF m/z (calc): 645.11 (645.08, [M - BF4]+).
C, H, N: 45.92/5.23/3.83 (calc); 45.79/5.20/3.78 (found).
were applied to the data using the program TWINABS:66 Tmin
0.710 and Tmax ) 0.930; 12 040 reflections were unique (Rint
)
)
0.0583), of which 9157 were observed with the criterion of I >
2σ(I); 784 parameters were refined with 236 least-squares restraints.
R1/wR2[I > 2σ(I)]: 0.060/0.110. R1/wR2[all reflns]: 0.096/0.128. S
) 1.15. The residual electron density was found between -1.25
and 1.49 e Å-3. Crystals were nonmerohedrally twinned with a
2-fold axis along the [-1 1 0] direction as the twin operation. The
minor twin fraction refined to 0.467(1). Occupancy factors for the
major components of the disordered counteranions were 0.65(3)
and 0.57(1).
Catalytic Studies. Eight experiments were run simultaneously
using a ChemSpeed automated apparatus. In each reaction vessel,
1.04 g (3.2 mmol) of Cs2CO3, 1.5 mL of a 1.06 M solution of
trans-phenylvinylboronic acid in tetrahydrofuran (1.6 mmol), 400
µL of water, 100 µL of dihexyl ether (internal reference), and 160
µL (1.2 equiv) of vinyl epoxide were added one after another.
Subsequently, 1 or 0.25 mol % palladium catalyst was added as a
solid, and the vial containing the catalyst was rinced with 1.5 mL
of tetrahydrofuran that was added to the vessel. After preparation
of the 8 vessels, the vessel holder was mounted on the ChemSpeed
system thermostated at 25 °C, and t ) 0 was set upon starting
stirring at 1000 rpm. At regular intervals, stirring was stopped, the
biphasic mixture left untouched during 10 s, and 50 µL of the upper
layer (THF) taken via a syringe in each of the 8 vessels and poured
into 3.0 mL of dichloromethane. Stirring of the vessels was then
switched on before workup of the 8 samples was started. Workup
consisted in adding 1.0 mL of 1 M NaOH to the dichloromethane
phase and extracting it three times to remove unreacted boronic
acid from the organic layer. The dichloromethane phase was
analyzed by GC using dihexyl ether as internal reference.
DFT Calculation. All DFT calculations were performed using
B3LYP/LANL2DZ as implemented in the GAMESS-UK program35
and using MOLDEN67 to visualize the structures and edit Z-
matrices. The geometry found in the X-ray structures of complexes
[4]+ and [5]+ was used as a starting point, using for [5]+ the
geometry containing Pd1 and Ru1. The chloride ligand was replaced
X-ray Crystallography. All reflection intensities were measured
using a Nonius KappaCCD diffractometer (rotating anode) with
graphite-monochromated Mo KR radiation (λ ) 0.71073 Å) using
the program COLLECT.60 The program PEAKREF61 was used to
refine the cell dimensions. Data reduction was done using the
program EVALCCD.62 The structure was solved with the program
(63) Beurskens, P. T.; Admiraal, G.; Beurskens, G.; Bosman, W. P.;
Carcia-Granda, S.; Gould, R. O.; Smits, J. M. M.; Smykalla, C. The
DIRDIFF99 Program System; Technical Report of the Crystallography
Laboratory, University of Nijmegen; University of Nijmegen: Nijmegen,
The Netherlands, 1999.
(64) Sheldrick, G. M. SHELXL97; University of Go¨ttingen: Go¨ttingen,
Germany, 1997.
(57) Steenwinkel, P.; James, S. L.; Grove, D. M.; Veldman, N.; Spek,
A. L.; van Koten, G. Chem.-Eur. J. 1996, 2, 1440.
(58) Terheijden, J.; van Koten, G.; Mul, W. P.; Stufkens, D. J.; Muller,
F.; Stam, C. H. Organometallics 1986, 5, 519.
(59) Fagan, P. J.; Ward, M. D.; Calabrese, J. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989,
111, 1698.
(60) Nonius. COLLECT; Nonius B. V.: Delft, The Netherlands1998.
(61) Schreurs, A. M. M. PEAKREF; Utrecht University: Utrecht, The
Netherlands, 2005.
(62) Duisenberg, A. J. M.; Kroon-Batenburg, L. M. J.; Schreurs,
A. M. M. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2003, 36, 220.
(65) Spek, A. L. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2003, 36, 7.
(66) Sheldrick, G. M. TWINABS; University of Go¨ttingen: Go¨ttingen,
Germany, 2003.
(67) Schaftenaar, G.; Noordik, J. H. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 2000,
14, 123.