Table 2 Enantioselective cyclopropylation of various aldehydes
efficient than DPMPM 1 and very high optical yields (90.8–
96.6% ee) were observed in each reaction (Entries 1–4). In the
cases of cinnamaldehyde, the two methods gave almost the
same results (Entry 5). It appears that DPMPM 1 is suitable
for the cyclopropylation of aliphatic aldehydes, with the corre-
sponding cyclopropyl alkanols being obtained with moderate
ee (Entries 6 and 7).
+
RCHO
Zn
2
Method A: (1R,2S)-PHONE 2, Ti(OPri)4, –30 °C
Method B: (R)-DPMPM 1, 0 °C
We have developed a highly enantioselective cyclopropyl-
ation of aldehydes by dicyclopropylzinc with the use of a
catalytic amount of chiral catalysts. Various chiral cyclopropyl
alkanols were obtained from both aromatic and aliphatic alde-
hydes depending on the choice of catalyst. The present method
provides a convenient and direct route for the preparation of
optically active cyclopropyl alkanols.
OH
*
R
Entry
R
Methoda Time/h Yield (%) Ee (%)b
1
2
3
4
5
Ph
A
Bc
A
B
A
B
2
5
3
3
2
2
2
2
93.1
90.1
98.9
96.7
85.0
96.7
88.6
93.7
94.1
94.1
91.3
86.6
96.0
85.8
96.6
86.2
90.8
84.1
95.6
78.2
63.6
67.3
67.0
70.5d
Acknowledgements
Financial support by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research
from the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and Culture
is gratefully acknowledged.
4-MeO-C6H4
4-Cl-C6H4
1-Naphthyl
A
B
PhCH᎐CH
A
B
1.5
1.5
1
᎐
References
6
7
PhCH2CH2
Cyclohexyl
Bc
B
1 (a) K. Soai and S. Niwa, Chem. Rev., 1992, 92, 833; (b) K. Soai and
T. Hayase, Yuki Gosei Kagaku Kyokaishi (J. Synth. Org. Chem. Jpn.),
1995, 53, 138; (c) K. Soai and T. Shibata, Yuki Gosei Kagaku
Kyokaishi (J. Synth. Org. Chem. Jpn.), 1997, 55, 994; (d) R. Noyori
and M. Kitamura, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1991, 30, 49;
(e) P. Knochel and R. D. Singer, Chem. Rev., 1993, 93, 2117.
2 (a) K. Soai, S. Yokoyama, K. Ebihara and T. Hayasaka, J. Chem.
Soc., Chem. Commun., 1987, 1690; (b) K. Soai, S. Yokoyama and
T. Hayasaka, J. Org. Chem., 1991, 56, 4264; (c) K. Soai, T. Hayase,
K. Takai and T. Sugiyama, J. Org. Chem., 1994, 59, 7908.
3 (a) K. Soai and A. Ookawa, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., 1986,
412; (b) A. Ookawa and K. Soai, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1,
1987, 1465; (c) K. Soai, A. Ookawa, K. Ogawa and T. Kaba,
J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., 1987, 467; (d) K. Soai, A. Ookawa,
T. Kaba and K. Ogawa, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1987, 109, 7111.
4 (a) K. Soai, S. Niwa, Y. Yamada and H. Inoue, Tetrahedron Lett.,
1987, 28, 4841; (b) S. Niwa and K. Soai, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans.
1, 1991, 2717.
5 (a) K. Soai, Y. Hirose and Y. Ohno, Tetrahedron: Asymmetry, 1993,
4, 1473; (b) K. Soai, Y. Ohno, Y. Inoue, T. Tsuruoka and Y. Hirose,
Recl. Trav. Chim. Pay-Bas, 1995, 114, 145.
6 (a) B. Schmidt and D. Seebach, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl.,
1991, 30, 99; (b) H. Takahashi, T. Kawakita, M. Ohno, M. Yoshioka
and S. Kobayashi, Tetrahedron, 1992, 48, 5691; (c) M. J. Rozema,
S. Achyutha Rao and P. Knochel, J. Org. Chem., 1992, 57, 1956.
7 K.-H. Thiele, S. Wilcke and M. Ehrhardt, J. Organomet. Chem.,
1968, 14, 13.
2
a Method A. Molar ratio of aldehyde:PHONE 2:Ti(OPri)4 :dicyclo-
propylzinc was 1.0:0.15:1.2:3.0. Method B. Molar ratio of
aldehyde:DPMPM 1:dicyclopropylzinc was 1.0:0.05:3.0. b Ee was
determined by HPLC using a chiral column. c 0.20 equiv. of DPMPM 1
was used. d Ee was determined as its benzoate by HPLC using a chiral
column.
effective with the aid of Ti(OPri)4 (Entry 6), especially when 15
mol% of 2 was used as a chiral catalyst. In this case 96.0% ee
was reached (Entry 7).
Various aldehydes were submitted to the enantioselective
cyclopropylation using PHONE 2 in coexistence of Ti(OPri)4
(Method A)‡ or DPMPM 1 (Method B)§ (Table 2). In the
cyclopropylation of aromatic aldehydes, PHONE 2 was more
‡ Typical experimental procedure for Method A (Table 2, Entry 1). A
toluene solution (2 ml) of (1R,2S)-PHONE 2 (41.3 mg, 0.15 mmol) and
Ti(OPri)4 (0.36 ml, 1.2 mmol) was stirred for 20 min at room tempera-
ture. The reaction vessel was cooled to Ϫ30 ЊC and a 1 toluene solu-
tion of dicyclopropylzinc (3 ml, 3 mmol) was injected into it. After the
reaction mixture was stirred for 20 min, a toluene solution (2 ml) of
benzaldehyde (106.1 mg, 1.00 mmol) was added at this temperature.
After the mixture was stirred for 2 h, the reaction was quenched by the
addition of sat. aq. NH4Cl (15 ml), then the mixture was filtered using
Celite and the filtrate was extracted with dichloromethane. The com-
bined extracts were dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate and evapor-
ated to dryness under reduced pressure. Purification of the crude prod-
uct on silica gel TLC (thin-layer chromatography) (eluent: CH2Cl2) gave
the pure cyclopropyl alkanol (137.9 mg, 0.931 mmol, 93.1%). Optical
purity was determined to be 96.0% ee by HPLC analysis.
8 The Chemistry of the Cyclopropyl Group, Parts
ed. Z. Rappoport, Wiley, New York, 1987.
1 and 2,
9 (a) C. W. Bradshaw, W. Hummel and C.-H. Wong, J. Org. Chem.,
1992, 57, 1532; (b) X. Zhang, H. Kumobayashi and H. Takaya,
Tetrahedron: Asymmetry, 1994, 5, 1179; (c) T. Nagata, K. D. Sugi,
T. Yamada and T. Mukaiyama, Synlett, 1996, 1076.
10 C. Petrier, J. C. S. Barbosa, C. Dupuy and J.-L. Luche, J. Org.
Chem., 1985, 50, 5761.
§ Typical experimental procedure for Method B (Table 2, Entry 1). To a
hexane solution (4 ml) of (R)-DPMPM 1 (26.8 mg, 0.10 mmol) and
benzaldehyde (52.7 ml, 0.50 mmol) was added a 1 toluene solution of
dicyclopropylzinc (1.5 ml, 1.5 mmol) at 0 ЊC. The quenching treatment
and purification was the same as that of Method A and gave pure
cyclopropyl alkanol (66.3 mg, 0.45 mmol, 90.1%). Optical purity was
determined to be 85.8% ee by HPLC analysis.
Paper 7/07315A
Received 9th October 1997
Accepted 18 November 1997
178
J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1, 1998