Tyrosinase Inhibition Potency of Resorcinol DeriVatiVes
Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 2007, Vol. 50, No. 11 2677
1H NMR Data. DPPA ethyl ester [3-(2,4-dihydroxyphenyl)-
propionic acid ethyl ester, (compound 2] (acetone-d6): δ 6.9 (1H,
d, J ) 8.20 Hz); 6.38 (1H, d, J ) 2.60 Hz); 6.27 (1H, dd, J )
8.18, 2.20 Hz); 3.58 (2H, q, J ) 6.70 Hz); 2.79 (2H, t, J ) 7.80
Hz), 2.56 (2H, t, J ) 7.40 Hz); 1.12 (3H, t, J ) 6.70 Hz).
DPPA isopropyl ester [3-(2,4-dihydroxyphenyl)propionic acid
isopropyl ester, compound 3] (acetone-d6): δ 6.9 (1H, dd, J ) 8.18,
6.30 Hz), 6.37 (1H, d, J ) 2.23 Hz), 6.28 (1H, dt, J ) 8.56, 2.20
Hz), 4.9 (1H, sept., J ) 6.33 Hz), 2.79 (2H, t, J ) 7.80 Hz), 2.55
(2H, t, J ) 7.44 Hz), 1.19 (6H, d, J ) 6.33 Hz).
DPPA octyl ester [3-(2,4-dihydroxyphenyl)propionic acid octyl
ester, compound 4] (acetone-d6): δ 7.02 (1H, d, J ) 7.80 Hz); 6.5
(1H, d, J ) 2.23 Hz); 6.4 (1H, dd, J ) 8.18, 2.23 Hz); 3.72 (2H,
t, J ) 7.07 Hz); 2.92 (2H, t, J ) 7.80 Hz); 2.69 (2H, t, J ) 7.80
Hz); 1-1.7 (15H, m).
DPPA tert-butyl ester [3-(2,4-dihydroxyphenyl)propionic acid
tert-butyl ester, compound 5] (acetone-d6): δ 6.89 (1H, d, J ) 8.18
Hz); 6.38 (1H, d, J ) 2.23 Hz); 6.28 (1H, dd, J ) 8.10, 2.23 Hz);
2.77 (2H, t, J ) 8.20 Hz); 2.54 (2H, t, J ) 7.815 Hz); 1.5 (9H, s).
DPPA 2,2-dimethylpropyl ester [3-(2,4-dihydroxyphenyl)-
propionic acid 2,2-dimethylpropyl ester, compound 6] (acetone-
d6): δ 6.89 (1H, d, J ) 8.18 Hz); 6.38 (1H, d, J ) 2.23 Hz); 6.28
(1H, dd, J ) 8.10, 2.23 Hz); 3.74 (2H, s); 2.82 (2H, t, J ) 8.20
Hz); 2.59 (2H, t, J ) 7.815 Hz); 0.9 (9H, s).
3,3,5,5-Tetramethyl-4-heptyl ester [3-(2,4-dihydroxyphenyl)-
propionic acid 3,3,5,5-tetramethyl-4-heptyl ester, compound 7]
(CDCl3): δ 6.87 (1H, d, J ) 8.10 Hz); 6.34 (1H, d, J ) 2.40 Hz);
6.32 (1H, dd, J ) 8.10, 2.70 Hz); 3.74 (1H, s); 2.9 (2H, t, J ) 8.00
Hz); 2.66 (2H, t, J ) 8.00 Hz); 1.2 (4H, q, J ) 7.20 Hz); 0.77
(12H, s); 0.735 (6H, t, J ) 7.50 Hz).
Tyrosinase Inhibitory Effect of DPPA Derivatives. Potassium
phosphate buffer (70 µL, 50 mM) at pH 6.5, 30 µL of tyrosinase
(final concentration of 50 units/mL), and 3 µL of the tested
compounds dissolved in absolute ethanol (final concentration of
5-100 µM) were added to wells of 96-well plates. After 10 min
incubation at 25 °C, L-tyrosine (final concentration of 1 mM) was
added. The optical density (450 nm) of the samples was measured
(ELISA SLT Lab Instruments Co. A-5082) every 5 min, relative
to the control, which contained ethanol (2 µL and without inhibitor),
demonstrating a linear color change with time. The IC50 was
calculated at the linear zone of the curve (20 min with L-tyrosine,
as the substrate).
Preincubation of Compounds 6, 7, and DPPA with Tyrosi-
nase. Either compouns 5 or 7 or DPPA was tested, with and without
preincubation, with the enzyme. Each of these compounds was
added separately to the enzymatic reaction, as described above, at
concentrations that inhibit 80% of the enzyme activity (0.5, 0.3,
and 10 µM for compounds 5, 7, and DPPA, respectively). After
10 min of incubation, the substrate (L-tyrosine, 1.0-3.75 mM) was
added. The formation of DOPA-quinone was followed by an
absorption measurement at 450 nm, 20 min after the addition of
L-tyrosine.
Sample Dialysis. DPPA (10 µM) was incubated with tyrosinase
for 20 min, followed by dialysis (dialysis cassette, 10000 MWCO,
Pierce) overnight. The activity of the enzyme was measured after
dialysis and compared to that of the enzyme under the same
conditions before dialysis. After dialysis, the presence of free
DPPA, was also tested by LC-MS at the ES- mode (LC- Waters
2790 HPLC, with the Waters Photodiode Array Detector 996,
attached to the Micromass Quattro Ultima MS). The protein
quantity was calculated by Bradford analysis, before and after the
dialysis.
Molecular Docking: Preparation of the Enzyme. The crystal
structure of the tyrosinase oxy form, complexed with a Caddie
Protein and prepared by the addition of hydrogen peroxide, was
retrieved from the Protein Data Bank.1 The enzyme was prepared
for docking by the ADT program (AutoDock Tools program), an
accessory program that allows the user to interact with AutoDock18-20
from a graphic user interface. Water, heteroatoms, and the Caddie
Protein were removed from the protein PDB file. Polar hydrogen
Table 1. Docking and Free Energies Calculated by Using AutoDock
Program. A Comparison between Experimental and Calculated IC50
Values
IC50 (µM)
docking
energy
free
energy
R
(kcal/mol) (kcal/mol) experimental calculateda
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
H
ethyl
isopropyl
octyl
-6.21
-7.41
-8.01
-7.98
-7.59
-8.19
-6.17
-5.43
-5.88
-6.45
-4.29
-6.9
-6.27
-6.73
1.85
0.22
0.07
0.70
14.87
0.18
0.15
0.40
0.27
0.12
0.70
0.0025
0.17
0.05
tert-butyl
2,2-dimethylpropyl
3,3,5,5-tetramethyl-
4-heptyl
a Calculated IC50 values were generated from free energy values by the
following equation, FE ) 3.738 × (IC50) - 6.909 (generated from a
regression curve relating free energy to experimental IC50).
(DPPA, 1) was isolated from fig leaves, as described below.
Solvents used were of HPLC grade.
Isolation and Structure Determination of DPPA from Fig
Leaves and Fruits. Dry leaves (380 g) from fig trees (Ficus carica
L.) were extracted twice, each time with 760 mL of 70% ethanol
in water. The crude extract (28.12 g, 7.4% yield) exhibited 80%
inhibition of the mushroom tyrosinase activity, at a concentration
of 0.032 mg/mL.
The dry extract was dissolved in 100 mL of 20% methanol in
water and centrifuged (12000 rpm, 4 °C) to remove insoluble
materials, and the supernatant was collected. The filtrate was
chromatographed on a silica gel column (silica gel S, 0.032-0063)
and eluted with a solvent mixture gradient (0% to 100% methanol/
dichloromethane). A sample from each fraction was examined for
tyrosinase inhibition, and the active fractions were collected and
rechromatographed on a similar form of silica gel. Fractions with
active compounds were then separated on an HPLC preparative
RP-18 column, using a gradient of eluents (5% to 30% acetonitrile/
water), followed by an additional separation on sephadex LH-25,
with methanol as an eluent, to afford a pure active compound (28
mg). The structure of the pure isolated active compound was
elucidated as 3-(2,4-dihydroxyphenyl)- propionic acid (DPPA) by
a conventional analytical method. UV-vis spectra (EtOH three
bands at λmax ) 210, 225, 280 nm); IR(KBr) ν ) 3387, 2933, 1701,
1605, 1515; NMR 6.94 (1H, d, J ) 8.18 Hz), 6.38 (1H, d, J )
2.60 Hz), 6.27 (1H, dd, J ) 8.18, 2.60 Hz), 2.79 (2H, t, J ) 7.44
Hz), 2.56 (2H, t, J ) 7.80 Hz).
Synthesis of DPPA Esters. DPPA ethyl (2), isopropyl (3), octyl
(4), tert-butyl (5), 2,2-dimethylpropyl (6), and 3,3,5,5-tetramethyl-
4-heptyl (7) esters (Table 1) were synthesized by conventional
procedures. Briefly, 20 mg (0.11mmol) of DPPA were dissolved
in 5 mL of the respective alcohol (for esters 2-6), 100 µL H2SO4
(98%) was added, and the resulting solution was heated to either
reflux or 100 °C for 2 h. A slight modification was employed for
the synthesis of ester 7. Briefly, 20 mg (0.11mmole) of DPPA was
reacted with 20 mg (0.22 mmol) of 3,3,5,5-tetramethyl-4-heptanol
in 1 mL of dry THF, followed by the addition of 50 µL of H2SO4.
After the solution had been stirred under argon for 24 h at 37 °C,
5 mL of water was added and each ester was extracted three times
with 10 mL of chloroform. The chloroform was evaporated under
reduced pressure, and the product was purified by flash chroma-
tography (silica gel, hexane:ethyl acetate, 70:30 as solvents),
affording purified esters, with a 75-85% yield. The products were
injected into the LC-MS under the electrospray ionization mode
(ES-), resulting in the expected molecular ion at m/z ) 181, 209,
223, 293, 237, 251, and 335 (M - 1) for compounds 1-7,
respectively.