A. Palazzi et al. / Journal of Organometallic Chemistry 669 (2003) 135ꢀ
/140
139
between the aromatic rings. At the same time, no
particular distortion of the pyridyl tetrazolate inter-
ring distance, consequent to diminution of conjugative
properties, was observed. However, since protonation
reactions were found to be reversible, it could be
possible to modify the structural and electronic features
of the target complex 2 by a proton addition-elimination
mechanism. Finally, it is worth noting that the com-
3JHH
ꢂ5 Hz), 5.41 (s, 5H, Cp), dC(CD3CN): 210.5
/
(CO), 164.2 (C-5), 150.4 (2?,6?-C5H4N), 136.8 (C-4?),
120.1 (3?,5?-C5H4N), 85.8 (Cp); IR (CH2Cl2) nmax
(cmꢃ1): 2066s (CO), 2020s (CO), 1610w (CÄ
/N); Anal.
Calc. for C13H9N5O2Fe: C, 48.3; H, 2.81; N, 21.7.
Found: C, 48.2; H, 2.79; N, 21.5%.
4.3. Methylation reaction: synthesis of [CpFe(CO)2(4-
plexes 2ꢀ/5 might represent good models for studying the
MeN4CꢀC5H4N)][O3SCF3] (3)
/
properties of differently substituted tetrazoles, whereas
the parent organic systems are normally obtained less
selectively or using more drastic conditions [19].
A solution of 2 (0.500 g, 0.92 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (20
ml) was treated with CH3OSO2CF3 (0.1 ml, 0.92 mmol)
with stirring, at ꢃ50 8C for 30 min. The mixture was
/
then allowed to warm to r.t. and stirred for additional 3
h. Evaporation of solvent and chromatography of the
brown residue on a short alumina filled column with
CH2Cl2 as solvent afforded a first red fraction of
[Fe2Cp2(CO)4] that was discharged. Elution with a
4. Experimental
4.1. General considerations
All reactions with organometallic reagents or sub-
strates were carried out under argon using standard
Schlenk techniques. Solvents were dried and distilled
under nitrogen prior to use. Unless otherwise stated,
chemicals were obtained commercially (e.g. Aldrich) and
used without any further purification. All the obtained
products were characterised by elemental analysis and
spectroscopic methods. IR spectra were recorded with a
FT-IR spectrometer Perkin Elmer spectrum 2000. The
routine NMR spectra (1H, 13C) were always recorded
using a Varian Gemini 300 instrument (1H, 300.1; 13C,
75.5 MHz). The spectra were referenced internally to
residual solvent resonance, and were recorded at 298 K
for characterisation purposes. Elemental analyses were
performed on a ThermoQuest Flash 1112 Series EA
Instrument. Petroleum ether (Etp) refers to a fraction of
mixture CH2Cl2ꢀ
(0.200 g, 70%), obtained as a pale brown oil. NMR:
3
dH(CD3CN): 8.90 (d, 2H, 2?,6?-C5H4N, JHH
/
CH3CN (2:1, v/v) gave the complex 3
ꢂ
/
7 Hz),
3
8.34 (d, 2H, 3?,5?-C5H4N, JHH
ꢂ
/
7 Hz), 5.45 (s, 5H,
Cp), 4.18 (3H, s, CH3); dC(CD3CN): 210.0 (CO), 154.1
(C-5), 147.5 (2?,6?-C5H4N), 138.0 (C-4?), 128.5 (3?,5?-
C5H4N), 87.8 (Cp), 37.6 (CH3); IR (CH2Cl2) nmax
(cmꢃ1): 2074s (CO), 2029s (CO), 1610w (CÄ
/N). Anal.
Calc. for C15H12N5O5FeF3S: C, 37.0; H, 2.48; N, 14.4.
Found: C, 36.9; H, 2.45; N, 14.5%.
4.4. Protonation reactions: synthesis of [CpFe(CO)2(4-
HN4Cꢀ
/
C5H4N)][O3SCF3] (4) and of [CpFe(CO)2(4-
HN4Cꢀ
/
C5H4NꢀH)][O3SCF3]2 (5)
/
To a stirred solution of 2 (0.300 g, 1.55 mmol) in
CH2Cl2 (20 ml), HOSO2CF3 (0.15 ml, 1.55 mmol,
diluted in 5 ml of CH2Cl2) was added dropwise at
b.p. 60ꢀ80 8C. Typically, all chromatographies were
/
performed on alumina filled column (diameter: 1.5 cm;
height 15 cm) under an Argon atmosphere and using
ꢃ60 8C. After 30 min the mixture was allowed to warm
/
dichloromethaneꢀ
/
acetonitrile mixtures as eluant.
to r.t. and the solvent removed in vacuo. The resulting
mixture was dissolved in 5 ml of acetonitrile and layered
with diethyl ether, causing the formation of a yellow
microcristalline powder which was identified as the
4.2. Synthesis of [CpFe(CO)2(N4CC5H4N)] (2)
Complex 1 (0.500 g; 1.26 mmol), dissolved in metha-
nol (5 ml), was added dropwise to a solution of 4-(1H-
tetrazol-5-yl)-pyridine (0.185 g, 1.26 mmol) and triethy-
lamine (0.18 ml; 1.30 mmol) in methanol (15 ml). The
complex 4 (0.65 g, 90%). NMR: dH(CD3CN): 8.87 (d,
3
2H, 2?,6?-C5H4N, JHH
ꢂ5 Hz), 8.51 (d, 2H, 3?,5?-
/
3
C5H4N, JHH
ꢂ5 Hz), 5.40 (s, 5H, Cp); dC(CD3CN):
/
210.5 (CO), 156.7 (C-5?), 143.7 (2?,6?-C5H4N), 141.2 (C-
4?), 125.2 (3?,5?-C5H4N), 87.5 (Cp); IR (CH2Cl2) nmax
resulting yellowꢀbrown suspension was stirred at room
/
temperature for 6 h., during which time the disappear-
ance of cationic species was monitored by IR spectro-
scopy. Filtration through a Celite pad and evaporation
to dryness afforded a reddish-brown crude product
which was purified by alumina filled column. After a
first red fraction of [Fe2Cp2(CO)4], the target complex 2
(0.183 g, 45%) was recovered as a yellow microcristalline
(cmꢃ1): 2068s (CO), 2024 s (CO), 1640w (CÄ
/N) Anal.
Calc. for C14H10N5O5FeF3S: C, 35.5; H, 2.11; N, 14.8.
Found: C, 35.4; H, 2.12; N, 14.9%. Complex 5 (0.77 g,
80%) was obtained in the same manner as 4 by using two
equivalents of triflic acid and it was re-crystallised, in the
presence of one of two more drops of acid, from an
acetonitrile solution layered with petroleum ether at r.t.,
powder by eluting with a dichloromethaneꢀ
/
acetonitrile
affording dark yellow plates. NMR: dH(CD3CN): 8.98
3
5:1 mixture. NMR: dH(CD3CN): 8.69 (d, 2H, 2?,6?-
(d, 2H, 2?,6?-C5H4N, JHH
ꢂ9 Hz), 8.56 (d, 2H, 3?,5?-
/
3
C5H4N, JHH
3
C5H4N, JHH
ꢂ
/
5 Hz), 7.94 (d, 2H, 3?,5?-C5H4N,
ꢂ9 Hz), 5.46 (s, 5H, Cp); dC(CD3CN):
/