Scheme 3. Synthesis of (E,E)-Nitrotriene 17
single diastereomer.17 Direct reduction to aldehyde 11 was
desired Diels-Alder precursor 17 in 64% yield following
accomplished using a modified aluminum hydride (11:12
ratio 7.7:1).18 The small quantities of alcohol 12 formed from
over-reduction were readily converted into 1119 for subse-
quent asymmetric allylboration to yield homoallylic alcohol
13.20
silica gel chromatography.
Thermal cyclization of 17 in benzene (reflux, 65 h) led to
a 1:10 ratio of a separable mixture of 18/19 (Scheme 4) in
Installation of the conjugated diene was completed through
a mesylation/elimination sequence to give acetonide 15
(Scheme 3). All reactions in this pathway were generally
straightforward. However, the key intermediate aldehyde 16
was very unstable and particularly prone to â-elimination
of the MOM ether. The mild oxidative cleavage of the diol
resulting from hydrolysis of 15 provided a ready source of
16, which could be used without further purification.
Treatment with nitromethane in the presence of KF afforded
a quantitative aldol condensation. Dehydration gave the
Scheme 4. Diels-Alder Cyclization of (E,E)-Nitrotriene 17
and Completion of the Synthesis of Enone 2
(6) (a) Fukuzawa, S.; Hayashi, Y.; Uemura, D.; Nagatsu, A.; Yamada,
K.; Ijuin, Y. Heterocycl. Commun. 1995, 1, 207. (b) Kuramoto, M.; Hayashi,
K.; Fujitani, Y.; Yamaguchi, K.; Tsuji, T.; Yamada, K.; Ijuin, Y.; Uemura,
D. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 5683.
(7) Williams, D. R.; Cortez, G. S. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 2675.
(8) Roush, W. R.; Hall, S. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1981, 103, 5200.
(9) Ainswroth, P. J.; Craig, D.; Reader, J. C.; Slawin, A. M. Z.; White,
J. P.; Williams, D. J. Tetrahedron 1995, 51, 11601.
(10) Wollenberg, R. H.; Miller, S. J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1978, 3219.
(11) Knochel, P.; Seebach, D. Synthesis 1982, 1017.
(12) Sauer, J.; Sustmann, R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1980, 19, 779.
(13) For related examples of C3-methyl stereocontrol in IMDA cycload-
ditions, see: (a) Williams, D. R.; Gaston, R. D.; Horton, I. B. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1985, 26, 1391. (b) Williams, D. R.; Bremmer, M. L.; Brown, D. L.;
D’Antuono, J. J. Org. Chem. 1985, 50, 2807.
excellent yield (92%). Both cycloadducts arise from the
diastereomeric endo transition states. Cyclization of 17 in
acetonitrile produced a more rapid reaction (7 h at 70 °C)
with a more favorable diastereomeric ratio (95:5) but a
reduced overall yield (66%). Assignment of stereochemistry
(14) Alcohol 7 was synthesized in four steps starting from 3-butyne-1-
ol using the following procedure: (1) PMBOC(NH)CCl3, TfOH, Et2O, rt;
n
(2) BuLi, EtOC(O)Cl, THF, -78 °C to rt; (3) MeCu‚LiI (2 equiv), THF,
-45 °C; (4) LiAlH4, Et2O, 0 °C. For an alternative preparation of alcohol
7, see: Nagano, H.; Nakanishi, E.; Takajo, S.; Sakuma, M.; Kudo, K.
Tetrahedron 1999, 55, 2591.
1
for the two diastereomers was based on H NMR coupling
constants and NOE experiments (Figure 1). MM2* minimi-
zations21 of 18 support the notion that the B-ring twist-boat
(as shown) may provide a significant conformational con-
tribution in order to avoid the 1,3-diaxial interaction of the
corresponding chair.
(15) Gage, J. R.; Evans, D. A. Org. Synth. 1989, 68, 83.
1
(16) All new compounds were characterized by H and 13C NMR, IR,
HRMS, and optical rotation where appropriate. Yields are for isolated,
chromatographically pure products.
(17) (a) Wick, A. E.; Felix, D.; Steen, K.; Eschenmoser, A. HelV. Chem.
Acta 1964, 47, 2425. (b) Felix, D.; Gschwend-Steen, K.; Wick, A. E.;
Eschenmoser, A. HelV. Chem. Acta 1969, 52, 1030.
(18) (a) Kim, S.; Ahn, K. H. J. Org. Chem. 1984, 49, 1717. (b) Taber,
D. F.; Silverberg, L. J.; Robinson, E. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113,
6639.
The desired trans-decalin 19 has been efficiently converted
to the desired R,â-unsaturated enone 2 in good yield (72%)
(19) Mancuso, A. J.; Huang, S.-L.; Swern, D. J. Org. Chem. 1978, 43,
2480.
(20) Brown, H. C.; Jadhav, P. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1983, 105, 2092.
(21) Molecular mechanics calculations were performed using the
MacroModel program version 7.0 (MM2* force-field).
Org. Lett., Vol. 2, No. 8, 2000
1025