K. Takaki et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 47 (2006) 7335–7337
7337
ity for various kinds of alkynes and amines, irrespective
of their product yields.
References and notes
1. For leading reviews, see: (a) Muller, T. E.; Beller, M.
Chem. Rev. 1998, 98, 675–703; (b) Pohlki, F.; Doye, S.
Chem. Soc. Rev. 2003, 32, 104–114; (c) Bytschkov, I.;
Doye, S. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 935–946; (d) Doye, S.
Synlett 2004, 1653–1672.
2. (a) Walsh, P. J.; Baranger, A. M.; Bergman, R. G. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 1708–1719; (b) Baranger, A. M.;
Walsh, P. J.; Bergman, R. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115,
2753–2763.
Figure 1. 1H NMR of the three-component system of 1, 4a, and 5a
(C6D6).
3. For example: Heutling, A.; Pohlki, F.; Doye, S. Chem.
Eur. J. 2004, 10, 3059–3071.
for 4-chloroaniline (7s) and 3,5-dichloroaniline (7u)
(runs 1–6). The reason for the low efficiency of 7s and
7u is unclear at present. Sterically demanding amines
like 7v and 7x afforded the Markovnikov products, 8v
and 8x, in high yields together with no or very little
amounts of the other isomers 9v and 9x, whereas the
2,6-diisopropyl group of 7w disturbed the reaction (runs
7–9). Compared to the original reaction with 1 alone,11
the three-component system improved the reactivity of
aliphatic amines, 7y–a, to a certain extent, but products
yields were still low and decreased in the order of
1° > 2° > 3°-alkyl substituents (runs 10–12). With re-
spect to the regioselectivity, all amines 7 other than 7u
gave the Markovnikov products 8 exclusively.
4. anti-Markovnikov selectivity: (a) Tillack, A.; Castro, I. G.;
Hartung, C. G.; Beller, M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002,
41, 2541–2543; (b) Zhang, Z.; Schafer, L. L. Org. Lett.
2003, 5, 4733–4736; Markovnikov selectivity: (c) Cao, C.;
Ciszewski, J. T.; Odom, A. L. Organometallics 2001, 20,
5011–5013; (d) Lorber, C.; Choukroun, R.; Vendier, L.
Organometallics 2004, 23, 1845–1850; See also: (e) Tillack,
A.; Khedkar, V.; Beller, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45,
8875–8878.
5. For review, see: Herrmann, W. A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2002, 41, 1290–1309.
6. (a) Herrmann, W. A.; Ofele, K.; Elison, M.; Kuhn, F. E.;
Roesky, P. W. J. Organomet. Chem. 1994, 480, C7–C9; (b)
Aihara, H.; Matsuo, T.; Kawaguchi, H. Chem. Commun.
2003, 2204–2205; (c) Shukla, P.; Johnson, J. A.; Vidovic,
D.; Cowley, A. H.; Abernethy, C. D. Chem. Commun.
2004, 360–361; (d) Downing, S. P.; Danopoulos, A. A.
Organometallics 2006, 25, 1337–1340.
7. Pohlki, F.; Doye, S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40,
2305–2308.
8. Tillack, A.; Jiao, H.; Castro, I. G.; Hartung, C. G.; Beller,
M. Chem. Eur. J. 2004, 10, 2409–2420.
We measured the NMR spectra of the three-component
system to get some information on the active species
generated in situ. At first, Ti-amide 1 was treated with
equimolar amounts of the isolated NHCs, 4a and 4b,
but all 1H and 13C NMR signals of 1 and 4 remained al-
most unchanged. Other titanium complexes 2 and 3 gave
similar results. These observations suggest that the
expected carbene complexes are not formed by this
procedure, which explains the results obtained by the
two-component system of 1 and 4 (Table 1, runs 2 and
3). The failure may be attributed to the four organic
ligands around the Ti(IV) metal, compared to the
successful examples that have at least two Cl ligands
9. Arduengo, A. J., III; Dias, H. V. R.; Harlow, R. L.; Kline,
M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 5530–5534.
10. General procedure for the reaction listed in Tables 2 and
3: all manipulations were performed under argon using
standard Schlenk and vacuum line techniques. Toluene
solutions (1 mL each) of NHC 4b (91 mg, 0.3 mmol) and
Li-silylamide 5a (25 mg, 0.15 mmol) were added to the Ti-
amide 1 (33 mg, 0.15 mmol), and the mixture was stirred
for 1 h at room temperature. A mixture of alkyne 6
(1.5 mmol) and amine 7 (4.5 mmol) in toluene (0.5 mL)
was added to the mixture, and stirring was continued for
2 h at 100 °C. The reaction mixture was passed through
Florisil with ether eluent and concentrated in vacuo. GC
confirmed formation of the imine products in comparison
with authentic samples separately prepared. Then, the
mixture was hydrolyzed to ketone or aldehyde by treat-
ment with silica gel in aqueous toluene at room temper-
ature overnight. After addition of dimethyl terephthalate
as an internal standard, the mixture was worked-up and
concentrated in vacuo. Identification of the carbonyl
compounds and determination of their yields were done
1
on the metal.6 On the other hand, the H NMR spectra
of the three components of 1, 4a, and 5a (1/1/1) showed
a significant peak shift (Fig. 1).12 Thus, the original sig-
nal of 1 at d 3.08 split into two parts (d 3.10 and 3.16)
and two signals of 4a at d 3.76 and 7.01 moved to upper
field (d 3.43 and 6.22), respectively, together with a little
downfield shift of 5a (from d 0.09 to 0.20). Although
further work is necessary to elucidate this new species,
it is likely that the NHC moiety close to the Ti metal
would change the reactivity of the original 1 and realize
high regioselectivity.
In summary, we have demonstrated that intermolecular
hydroamination of alkynes with Ti(NMe2)4 (1) was
much improved in the presence of the NHCs 4 and Li-
silylamide 5a, though the nature of the active species
generated in situ is still unclear. This three-component
system exhibited nearly complete Markovnikov selectiv-
1
by GC, GC–MS, and H NMR.
11. (a) Shi, Y.; Ciszewski, J. T.; Odom, A. L. Organometallics
2001, 20, 3967–3969; (b) Ref. 4b.
12. Although Li-silylamide 5a is known to form complexes
with NHCs 4, the present system would produce a
different species by the participation of 1.