J. Stoekigt and M. H. Zenk • Syntheses of CoA Thiol Esters
358
ment that his £max values superceded the previously
published ones is therefore not tenable. Besides, if
method was not possible due to the inability of
hydroxycinnamoyl-CoA ligase to activate sinapic
acid 19.
3
optical properties of CoA esters which are synthe-
sized in two different laboratories are compared
(Table IV, ref. 13), these determinations should be
made at the same pH value (Johns 13: pH 2.5 —3.0;
Gross and Zenk: pH 7.0). At any event, the differ-
ence in pH values used was not the reason for the
difference in £max values. Furthermore missprints of
quotations, i. e. Amax values of p-coumaroyl-CoA as
Table IV. UV-Absorption data for hydroxycinnamyol-CoA
derivatives (measured in 0 .1 m phosphate buffer pH 7.0).
CoA
deriva-
tives
^min
[nm]
£max x 106
at ^max II
[cm2/mol]
^max II
[nm]
^•max I
[nm]
285
287
287
289
21
18
19
—
p-Coumaroyl
Caffeoyl
Feruloyl
261
257
257
252
333
346
346
352
351 nm 1 3 instead of 333 nm
3
should be avoided.
In addition Johns1 3 has taken it as an encouraging
sign of the reliability of his £max values for CoA
thiol esters that they were closely similar to those
of the equivalent phenyl thiol esters. We have rede-
termined the £max value of cinnamoyl phenyl thiol
Sinapoyl
As can be seen from the data given in Table IV,
these values agree reasonably well with the values
previously published from our laboratory 3. One ex-
ception is caffeoyl-CoA, where both the Amax and
£max values of our previous determination is incor-
rect; this error had been noticed before 10. While the
Amax values of the different hydroxycinnamoyl-CoA
derivatives of Table IV agree with the ones reported
by Johns 13, his measured £max values are too high
as theoretically expected because of his erroneous
calibration procedure. For example his published
£max value for p-coumaroyl-CoA is about V 3 too high
(35 X 106) about the same order of magnitude by
which his extinction coefficient of the cinnamoyl
hydroxamate-iron complex is too low. Johns 1 3 state-
ester for which he reported an £max of 14.4 X 10
cm /mol. As an average value from independent
determinations of the analytical pure compound we
found 25.2 x 10 cm /mol.
6
2
6
6
2
The excellent technical assistance of Miss B. Ries
and Mr. L. Ändert is gratefully appreciated. Finan-
cial support was provided by the “Deutsche For-
schungsgemeinschaft”, our thanks are due to Prof.
J. McClure for his help in the english version of the
manuscript and to Dr. G. G. Gross and Mr. W.
Kreiten for adapting the column chromatography
method 23 to cinnamoyl-CoA derivatives.
1 A. J. Birch and F. W. Donovan, Austr. J. Chem. 6, 360
[1953].
18 J. C. Howard, M. C. Lin, P. M. Matthews, and S. A.
Singal, J. Med. Chem. 8, 888 [1965].
2 H. Grisebach, Proceedings of the IVth International Con-
gress of Biochemistry, Wien 1958, Vol. II, p. 56, Perga-
mon Press, London 1959.
3 G. G. Gross and M. H. Zenk, Z. Naturforsch. 21b, 683
[1966].
17 H. Tanaka and A. Yokoyama, Chem. Pharm. Bull. (To-
kyo) 10, 13 [1962].
18 W. Fuchs, Chem. Ber. 88, 1825 [1955].
19 G. G. Gross and M. H. Zenk, Eur. J. Biochem. 42, 453
[1974].
4 G. Billek and F. P. Schmook, Oesterr. Chem. Ztg. 67,
401 [1966].
20 E. R. Stadtman, Methods in Enzymology, Vol. Ill, p. 931,
Academic Press, New York 1957.
21 F. Lipman and L. C. Tuttle, J. Biol. Chem. 159, 21
[1945].
22 C. R. Hauser and W. B. Renfrow, Organic Syntheses, Coll.
Vol. 2, p. 67, A. H. Blatt, ed., John Wiley and Sons,
New York 1963.
5 M. H. Zenk, Proceedings of the 2nd Meeting of the
Federation of Europ. Biochem. Societies, Vol. 3, p. 45
(G. Billek, ed.), Pergamon Press, London 1966. — M. H.
Zenk, Ber. dtsch. Bot. Ges. 80, 573 [1968].
6 F. Kreuzaler and K. Hahlbrock, FEBS Lett. 28, 69
[1972].
23 C. Cha and R. E. Parks, J. Biol. Chem. 239, 1961
7 R. L. Mansell, J. Stöckigt, and M. H. Zenk, Z. Pflan-
zenphysiol. 68, 286 [1972].
[1964].
24 A. Al-Arif and M. Blecher, J. Lipid Res. 10, 344 [1969].
25 M. E. Pullman, Anal. Biochem. 54, 188 [1973].
28 J. Ebel, B. Schaller-Hekeler, K.-H. Knoblodi, E. Well-
mann, H. Grisebach, and K. Hahlbrock, Biochim. Biophys.
Acta 362, 417 [1974].
27 E. Walton and V. S. Butt, J. Exp. Bot. 21, 887 [1970];
E. Walton and V. S. Butt, Phytochemistry 10, 295
[1971]; M. J. C. Rhodes and L. S. C. Wooltorton,
Phytochemistry 12, 2381 [1973].
8 J. Ebel and H. Grisebach, FEBS Lett. 30, 141 [1973].
9 G. G. Gross, J. Stöckigt, R. L. Mansell, and M. H. Zenk,
FEBS Lett. 31, 283 [1973].
10 J. Stöckigt and M. H. Zenk, FEBS Lett. 42, 131 [1974].
11 T. Lindl, F. Kreuzaler, and K. Hahlbrock, Biochim. Bio-
phys. Acta 302, 457 [1973].
12 K. Hahlbrock, Ph. D. thesis, Freiburg 1965.
13 N. Johns, Z. Naturforsch. 29 c, 469 [1974].
14 T. Wieland and L. Rueff, Angew. Chem. 65, 186 [1953].
15 E. G. Trams and R. O. Brady, J. Amer. Chem. Soc. 82,
2972 [I960].
28 E. Wellmann, D. Baron, and H. Grisebach, Biochim. Bio-
phys. Acta 244, 1 [1971].
Brought to you by | Central Michigan University
Authenticated
Download Date | 12/16/15 3:40 AM