Journal of the American Chemical Society
Article
bisstyrylbenzene (compound 8 in ref 55), whose 2P properties have
been well characterized in methanol, were used as the references in
2PF measurements. The samples were prepared in DMSO (Sigma-
Aldrich, spectrophotometric grade) at a concentration of 3−8 × 10−4
M, and the optical path length of sample cuvettes for 2PF
measurements was 1 cm. For z-scan measurements,56 an optical
parametric amplified laser (Spectra Physics, TOPAS) pumped by a
mode-locked Ti:sapphire regenerative amplifier system (Spectra
Physics, Solstice) was used as the excitation source. The excitation
beam for z-scan is spatially filtered as a near Gaussian beam with M2 <
ASSOCIATED CONTENT
■
S
* Supporting Information
The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the
NMR spectra and HR-MS for all new compounds (PDF)
AUTHOR INFORMATION
■
Corresponding Authors
2
1.1 and waist ω(HW1/e ) ∼ 40 μm. The excitation irradiance ranged
from 50 to 150 GW/cm2. The samples were prepared in DMSO (ca. 2
mM), and the optical path length of sample cuvettes for z-scan
measurements was 1 mm.
Author Contributions
∥These authors contributed equally.
Laser Flash Photolysis in Droplets. A mode-locked Ti:sapphire
laser (Mira 9000F, Coherent, Santa Clara, CA, USA) pumped by 8 W
solid-state Verdi V-8 (Coherent) was used for 2P excitation of BIST-
2EGTA or DM-nitrophen. Wavelength of the laser was set to 720 or
810 nm with pulse duration of ∼120 fs. Power of the laser was
adjusted by neutral density and polarizing filters and was measured at
the objective focal plane by a power meter (PM200 with sensor
S170C, Thorlabs, Newton, New Jersey, USA). The laser beam was
guided to the SIM scanner of the confocal microscope (Fluoview
1000, Olympus, Volketswil, Switzerland) operating in single point
excitation mode simultaneously with the main scanner. The photolysis
period was 1 or 20 ms, and the duration was controlled by an
electronic shutter LS3 (Vincent Associates, Rochester, NY, USA) and
triggered by the confocal microscope. The main scanner of confocal
microscope was operating in line scan mode. To record changes in
Ca2+ concentration fluo-3, rhod-2 (both Biotium Inc., Hayward, CA,
USA), X-rhod-5F (Life Technologies), or rhod-FF (Teflabs, Austin,
TX, USA) were excited at 473 or 561 nm, respectively. Solutions used
for droplet experiments were composed of (mM): for Figure 2d: 1
BIST-2EGTA, 0.1 rhod-FF, 2 CaCl2, 100 KCl, 10 HEPES, pH = 7.80;
for Figure 2f: 1 BIST-2EGTA, 0.1 rhod-FF, 2 CaCl2, 100 KCl, 10
HEPES, pH = 8.0; for Figure 2e: 2 DM-nitrophen, 0.5 CaCl2, 0.1 fluo-
3, 1 GSH, 5 K2ATP, 10 HEPES, 20 TEA-Cl, 120 L-aspartic acid, 120
CsOH, pH = 7.20; for Figure 2f: 2 DM-nitrophen, 2 CaCl2, 0.1 rhod-
FF, 100 KCl, 10 HEPES, pH = 7.20. Recorded images were analyzed
in MATLAB (MathWorks, Inc., Natick, MA, USA) and Igor Pro
(WaveMetrics, Inc., Portland, OR, USA).
Laser Flash Photolysis in Cardiac Myocytes. Cardiac
ventricular myocytes were isolated from C57Bl/6 mice, as described
before.57 Myocytes were whole-cell patch-clamped at a resting
potential −80 mV. A train of 5−10 prepulses from −40 to 0 mV in
the presence of 100 nM isoproterenol was applied to load the
sarcoplasmic reticulum with Ca2+. A photolytic pulse with a duration of
1−100 ms was applied 1−3 s after last conditioning pulse to release
Ca2+ from BIST-2EGTA. For 2P photolysis we used a Ti:sapphire
laser with a wavelength of 810 nm, and for single photon photolysis we
used a UV diode laser with wavelength 405 nm. Both laser beams were
guided to the SIM scanner, and data acquisition was the same as
described above. Myocytes were placed in a recording chamber in
external bath solution containing (mM): 140 NaCl, 5 KCl, 1 CsCl, 1.8
CaCl2, 0.5 BaCl2, 10 HEPES, 10 glucose, pH = 7.40. Pipettes were
filled with internal solution containing (mM): for Figures 3a−e and
4a: 0.5 BIST-2EGTA, 0.8 CaCl2, 0.1 rhod-2, 1 GSH, 4 K2ATP, 5
MgCl2, 10 HEPES, 20 TEA-Cl, 120 L-aspartic acid, 120 CsOH, 8
NaCl, pH = 7.50; for Figure 4b: 1 BIST-2EGTA, 1.5 CaCl2, 0.1 X-
rhod-5F, 1 GSH, 5 K2ATP, 10 HEPES, 20 TEA-Cl, 120 L-aspartic acid,
120 CsOH, 8 NaCl, pH = 7.40. Images in Figures 3a−e and 4a were
normalized, filtered with Gaussian (kernel [5 5]) and Wiener filters
(kernel [10 10]), and smoothed by cubic spline (p = 0.5 in MATLAB
“caps” function). Experiments were performed at room temperature.
All recorded images were processed and analyzed in MATLAB,
imageJ, and Igor Pro.
Notes
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
■
This work was supported by grants from the US NIH
(GM053395 and NS069720) to G.C.R.E.-D., the AFOSR
MURI (FA9550-10-10558) to J.W.P., and the Swiss National
Science Foundation (31-156375 and the Microscopy Imaging
Center, or “MIC”) to E.N. We would like to thank Drs. Simon
Langenegger and Robert Haner for their help.
̈
REFERENCES
■
(1) Brieke, C.; Rohrbach, F.; Gottschalk, A.; Mayer, G.; Heckel, A.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 8446−8476.
(2) Barltrop, J. A.; Plant, P. J.; Schofield, P. Chem. Commun. 1966,
822−823.
(3) Kaplan, J. H.; Forbush, B.; Hoffman, J. F. Biochemistry 1978, 17,
1929−1935.
(4) Ellis-Davies, G. C. R. Nat. Methods 2007, 4, 619−628.
(5) McGall, G. H.; Barone, A. D.; Diggelmann, M.; Fodor, S. P. A.;
Gentalen, E.; Ngo, N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 5081−5090.
(6) Adams, S. R.; Tsien, R. Y. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 1993, 55, 755−84.
(7) Ellis-Davies, G. C. Methods Enzymol. 2003, 360, 226−238.
(8) Warmuth, R.; Grell, E.; Lehn, J. M.; Bats, J. W.; Quinkert, G.
Helv. Chim. Acta 1991, 74, 671−681.
(9) Basa, P. N.; Antala, S.; Dempski, R. E.; Burdette, S. C. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 13027−13031.
(10) Wu, L.; Dai, Y.; Marriott, G. Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 2018−2021.
́
(11) Li, D.; Herault, K.; Isacoff, E. Y.; Oheim, M.; Ropert, N. J.
Physiol. (Oxford, U. K.) 2012, 590, 855−873.
(12) Ellis-Davies, G. C. R.; Kaplan, J. H.; Barsotti, R. J. Biophys. J.
1996, 70, 1006−1016.
(13) DelPrincipe, F.; Egger, M.; Ellis-Davies, G. C.; Niggli, E. Cell
Calcium 1999, 25, 85−91.
(14) Momotake, A.; Lindegger, N.; Niggli, E.; Barsotti, R. J.; Ellis-
Davies, G. C. Nat. Methods 2006, 3, 35−40.
(15) Ellis-Davies, G. C. R. Chem. Rev. 2008, 108, 1603−1613.
(16) Amatrudo, J. M.; Olson, J. P.; Agarwal, H. K.; Ellis-Davies, G. C.
R. Eur. J. Neurosci 2015, 41, 5−16.
(17) Chiu, C. Q.; Lur, G.; Morse, T. M.; Carnevale, N. T.; Ellis-
Davies, G. C. R.; Higley, M. J. Science 2013, 340, 759−762.
(18) Rial Verde, E. M.; Zayat, L.; Etchenique, R.; Yuste, R. Front.
Neural Circuits 2008, 2, 2.
(19) Olson, J. P.; Banghart, M. R.; Sabatini, B. L.; Ellis-Davies, G. C.
R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 15948−15954.
(20) Priestman, M. A.; Shell, T. A.; Sun, L.; Lee, H.-M.; Lawrence, D.
S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 7684−7687.
(21) Fournier, L.; Gauron, C.; Xu, L.; Aujard, I.; Le Saux, T.; Gagey-
Eilstein, N.; Maurin, S.; Dubruille, S.; Baudin, J. B.; Bensimon, D.;
Volovitch, M.; Vriz, S.; Jullien, L. ACS Chem. Biol. 2013, 8, 1528−
1536.
F
J. Am. Chem. Soc. XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX