3476
A. R. Renslo et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 16 (2006) 3475–3478
O
S
CF3
O
S
O
S
Y
Y
Y
O
N
X
N
X
N
X
b, c
a
O
O
O
N
N
N
O
O
O
5a-b
6a-b
7a-c
NHBoc
NHBoc
NHBoc
e
O
S
O
S
F
F
O
O
d
N
F
N
F
O
O
N
O
N
O
H
H
8
9
Scheme 2. Reagents and conditions: (a) (CF3CO)2O, N-methylmorpholine, CH2Cl2, rt; (b) mCPBA, CH2Cl2; (c) K2CO3, MeOH, CH3CN, reflux
(30–45% for three steps); (d) DDQ, dioxane, reflux, 22 h (35%); (e) 2.5 equiv LiOt-Bu, 1.3 equiv (S)-ClCH2CH(OH)CH2NHBoc, DMF (71%).
the sulfoxide analogs 3a–c, which were prepared as
described elsewhere.5 Reaction of 3a–c with trifluoro-
acetic anhydride in the presence of N-methylmorpholine
produced the dihydrothiopyran ring system in a single
step. This conversion presumably proceeds via initial
Pummerer rearrangement followed by elimination of
trifluoroacetic acid from the a-trifluoroacetoxy sulfide
intermediate.6 Oxidation with peracetic acid in THF
then provided sulfone analogs 4a–c. When thiomorpho-
line sulfoxide analogs 5a–b5 were subjected to similar
reaction conditions, the unexpected trifluoroacetyl-
substituted compounds 6a–b were obtained (Scheme 2).
In this case, the initially formed dihydrothiazine interme-
diate reacts with excess trifluoroacetic anhydride in the
reaction mixture, thus generating 6a–b. The trifluoroace-
tyl group in 6a–b could be removed under surprisingly
mild conditions (K2CO3 in refluxing MeOH–MeCN). A
final oxidation step then provided the desired dihydrothi-
azine S,S-dioxide intermediates 7a–b. For the bis-fluoro
B-ring series (i.e., 7c) an alternative protocol was em-
ployed. Thiomorpholine intermediate 85 was oxidized
with DDQ in refluxing dioxane to afford the dihydrothi-
azine 9 directly in modest yield along with recovered 8.
This protocol was only effective with bis-fluorinated inter-
mediates such as 8. The desired bis-fluoro oxazolidinone
intermediate 7c was prepared from 9 using established
procedures.7
12a–k bearing dichloroacetamide, difluoroacetamide,
or difluorothioacetamide8 functionality at C-5.
The synthesis of dihydrothiazine analogs 13a–k pro-
ceeded similarly, starting from Boc-protected amino-
methyl oxazolidinones 7a–c. Removal of the Boc
group in 7a–c was accomplished with TMSOTf in
2,6-lutidine,9 after we discovered that the dihydrothi-
azine ring in 7a–c was sensitive to typical acidic Boc
cleavage conditions. The resulting amines 11a–c were
then converted to dihydrothiazine analogs 13a–k as de-
scribed above for 12a–k (Scheme 3).
The new oxazolidinone analogs were tested against a
panel of Gram-positive and fastidious Gram-negative
bacteria. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC, in
lg/mL) values were determined using standard broth
microdilution methods.10 The activities of dihydrothio-
pyran analogs are summarized in Table 1 and those for
the dihydrothiazine analogs are presented in Table 2.
MIC data for the progenitor analogs 1 and 2 are provided
for comparison.
The in vitro activity of dihydrothiopyran analogs was
similar to that of the parent tetrahydrothiopyran analog
1. The acetamides 4a–c had similar Gram-positive activity
as 1 but were generally less active against the Gram-
negative pathogen Haemophilus influenzae. Surprisingly,
the degree of B-ring fluorination had little impact on
overall potency, although a mono-fluoro B-ring does
appear optimal for activity against H. influenzae and
Moraxella catarrhalis. Among the C-5 side chains exam-
ined, the dichloroacetamide variant (e.g., 12a, 12e, and
12i) consistently produced the bestGram-negative activity,
The synthesis of analogs of various C-5 side-chain type
was accomplished as shown in Scheme 3, starting from
compounds 4a–c or 7a–c. The C-5 acetamide in 4a–c
was cleaved via acid hydrolysis and the resulting amines
10a–c acylated with anhydride or ester reagents. This
two-step protocol provided dihydrothiopyran analogs
O
S
O
S
O
S
Y
Y
Y
O
O
O
Z
X
Z
X
Z
X
a
b or c
O
O
O
N
N
N
O
O
O
NH2
12a-k
13a-k
NH
4a-c
NH
Z = CH
Z = N
10a-c
11a-c
Z = CH; R = CH3
7a-c Z = N; R = Ot-Bu
Z = CH
Z = N
R
R
Q
O
R = CH3, CHF2, CHCl2
Q = O, S
a X, Y = H; b X = F; Y = H; c X, Y = F
Scheme 3. Reagents and conditions: (a) for 4a–c: HCl, MeOH, 75 °C, 20 h; for 7a–c: TMS-OTf, 2,6-lutidine, CH2Cl2, rt, 1 h, then MeOH, 30 min;
(b) (RC@O)2O, Py, CH2Cl2 (80% overall); (c) CHF2C(O)OEt or Ph2CHCH2CH2OC(S)CHF2, Et3N, MeOH (40–80% overall).