866
M. Badland et al. / Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 21 (2010) 864–866
Thermomyces lanuginosus lipase (LipozymeÒ TL 100L) were selec-
tive for the desired cis-(1R,3S)-stereoisomer and cholesterol ester-
ase from Candida cylindracea (Roche) was selective for the
undesired cis-(1S,3R)-stereoisomer, leaving unreacted cis-(1R,3S)-
ester. Enzymatic kinetic resolutions employing the four hydrolases
were repeated in 1 mg-scale microreactions (Table 1). The results
confirmed this enzymatic approach to be viable with cholesterol
esterase from Candida cylindracea exhibiting the highest stereose-
lectivity (Table 1, entry 5, >99% substrate ee and product ee at
50% conversion).
5.3. Purification to give pure cis-isomer 4
At first, 3-[(tert-butoxycarbonyl)amino]cyclohexanecarboxylic
acid 3 (26 g) and dichloromethane (130 mL) were charged to the
reaction vessel giving a clear solution. n-Heptane (130 mL) was
charged slowly at room temperature and the resulting slurry was
granulated for 2–3 h. The mixture was filtered and the cake was
washed with n-heptane (2 ꢀ 20 mL) and dried in vacuum oven at
45 °C for 16 h to afford the title compound as a white solid
(16.2 g, 42% yield). 1H NMR (DMSO-d6) 1–1.3 (m, 5H), 1.3–1.4 (s,
9H), 1.6–1.8 (m, 3H), 1.9–2.0 (m, 1H), 2.1–2.3 (m, 1H), 6.6–6.8 (s,
1H), 11.8–12.1 (s, 1H v broad).
4. Conclusion
A simple, efficient and reliable procedure has been found for the
synthesis of 3-[(tert-butoxycarbonyl)amino]-cyclohexanecarbox-
ylic acid. In addition to the salt resolution using (R)-1-phenylethyl-
amine, a set of four hydrolases have been identified and shown to
resolve the racemic cis-isomer by the stereoselective hydrolysis of
racemic ethyl 3-[(tert-butoxycarbonyl)amino]cyclohexane-carbox-
ylic ester.
5.4. (1R,3S)-3-[(tert-Butoxycarbonyl)amino]cyclohexane-
carboxylic acid. (R)-1-Phenylethylamine salt
Racemic cis 3-[(tert-butoxycarbonyl)amino]cyclohexane carbox-
ylic acid 4 (0.5 g, 2.0 mmol) and ethanol (2.5 mL) were charged to
the reaction vessel and stirred at room temperature until a solution
obtained. (R)-1-Phenylethylamine (0.125 g, 1.0 mmol, 0.5 equiv)
was charged and the resulting precipitate was stirred at 70 °C until
a full solution was obtained which was then allowed cool to ambient
temperature and stirred for 16 h. The product was isolated by filtra-
tion, washed with n-heptane (2 ꢀ 5 mL) and dried under vacuum for
16 h at 45 °C to give the title compound as a white solid (0.186 g, 25%
yield). 1H NMR (DMSO-d6) 1.0–1.2 (m, 4H), 1.2–1.3 (m, 1H), 1.3 (d,
3H), 1.4 (s, 9H), 1.6–1.7 (d, 2H), 1.8 (d, 1H), 1.9 (d, 1H), 2.2 (t, 1H),
4.0 (m, 1H), 6.7 (d, 1H), 7.2 (m, 1H), 7.3 (m, 2H), 7.4 (m, 2H).
5. Experimental
5.1. 3-Aminocyclohexanecarboxylic acid, 2 (5:1 mixture)
At first, 3-aminobenzoic acid 1 (30 g, 0.22 mol), methanol
(570 mL) and water (30 mL) were charged to a suitable-sized
hydrogenation vessel. Rhodium on carbon (5%, Type 20A, 6 g)
was charged and the resulting mixture was hydrogenated at
300 PSi and 70 °C. The hydrogen uptake was monitored and the
reaction was deemed complete after 3 h at which point water
(210 mL) was charged to the reaction slurry to solubilise the prod-
uct. The reaction mixture was filtered through a plug of ArbocelÒ
and the residue was washed with methanol (90 mL). The filtrate
was concentrated to dryness under reduced pressure to leave a
white solid residue. The solid was granulated in MeOH (150 mL)
for 1 h at room temperature before being isolated by filtration
and dried to give the title compound as a white solid (22.6 g, 72%
yield).1H NMR (CDOD3) as sodium salt: 0.9–1.4 (m, 3H), 1.4–1.6
(m, 1H), 1.7–1.9 (m, 3H), 2.0–2.2 (m, 2H), 2.5–2.6 (m, 1H).
5.5. (1R,3S)-3-[(tert-Butoxycarbonyl)amino]cyclohexane
carboxylic acid 5
(1R,3S)-3-[(tert-Butoxycarbonyl)amino]cyclohexane carboxylic
acid. (R)-1-Phenylethylamine salt (45 mg) was suspended in ethyl
acetate (10 mL) and washed with 0.1 M aqueous hydrochloric acid
(2 ꢀ 5 mL). The organic layer was separated, dried over magnesium
sulfate, filtered and evaporated to a white solid which was dried
under vaccum at 50 °C to give 30 mg of the title compound. 1H
NMR (CDCl3) 1.01–1.07 (m, 1H), 1.22–1.41 (m, 2H), 1.45 (s, 9H),
1.84–1.88 (m, 1H), 1.97–2.00 (m, 2H), 2.27–2.31 (m, 1H), 2.40–
2.47 (m, 1H), 4.47 (m, v broad, 1H), 4.44 (m, v broad, 1H), 5.07
(s, v broad, NH). Calcd for C12H22NO4 m/z 244.154883, found m/z
244.1541 and calcd for C12H21NNaO4 266.136828, found m/z
5.2. 3-[(tert-Butoxycarbonyl)amino]cyclohexane carboxylic acid3
At first, 3-aminocyclohexanecarboxylic acid 2 (5:1 mixture,
22.4 g, 0.16 mol), 1,4-dioxane (225 mL) and water (225 mL) were
charged to a 500 mL three-necked flask. Diisopropylethylamine
(82 mL, 0.47 mol, 3.0 equiv) was added to the resulting mixture fol-
lowed by a portionwise addition of di-tert-butyl dicarbonate (39.7 g,
0.18 mol, 1.15 equiv). The reaction mixture was stirred at room tem-
perature for 16 h and then concentrated under reduced pressure to
remove 1,4-dioxane. Dichloromethane (225 mL) was charged to the
residue and the mixture was stirred for 10 min. The organic phase
was removed and the aqueous phase was acidified to pH 3 using
20% w/w citric acid solution. The acidic aqueous layer was extracted
with dichloromethane (2 ꢀ 200 mL). The organic phases were com-
bined, washed with water (100 mL) and dried over MgSO4. Filtration
and concentration to dryness afforded the crude product as a sticky
solid. The residue was granulated in n-heptane (180 mL) for 1 h at
room temperature before being isolated by filtration. The filter cake
was washed with n-heptane (2 ꢀ 40 mL) and dried in vacuum oven
at 45 °C for 16 h to give the title compound as a white solid (26.34 g,
69%). Analysis of the isolated product by 1H NMR confirmed the
presence of the unwanted trans isomer.
266.1362. ½a 2D5
ꢁ
¼ ꢂ46:9 (c 0.10099, MeOH), lit. ½a D25
¼ ꢂ50:5 (c 1,
ꢁ
MeOH).
Acknowledgements
We thank Dr. Simon Mantell and Dr. Andrew Morrell for useful
discussions and Mr. Timothy J. Evans for synthesis of the racemic
intermediate.
References
1. Hu, Yu et al Chin. J. Chem. 2006, 24, 795–799.
2. Amorin, M.; Castedo, Luis; Granja, J. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 2844–2845.
3. Murahashi, Shun-Ichi et al J. Org. Chem. 1989, 54, 3292–3303.
4. Amorin, M.; Castedo, L.; Granja, J. R. Chem. Eur. J. 2005, 11, 6543–6551.
5. Allan, D. R.; Johnston, A. R.; Twitchin, B. Aust. J. Chem. 1981, 34, 2231–2236.
6. Corey, E. J. et al J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 6310–6311.
7. Yazbeck, D. R.; Tao, J.; Martinez, C. A.; Kline, B. J.; Hu, S. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2003,
345, 524–532.
8. Rakels, J. L. L.; Straathof, A. J. J.; Heijnen, J. J. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 1993, 15,
1051–1056.