´
S. Beloševic et al. / Inorganica Chimica Acta 399 (2013) 146–153
152
established as a criterion for distinguishing them. There is a gener-
ally accepted rule that the frequency assigned to five-membered
rings [37] lies at a higher energy level than the corresponding fre-
quency of six-membered chelate rings [38]. The IR data reported
here for diaminotricarboxylate nickel(II) complexes support the
above trend regarding the asymmetric frequencies of carboxylate
groups. The frequencies at 1602 cmꢁ1 and 1598 cmꢁ1 were as-
signed to the moieties of the five-membered acetato arms of Ni-
pd3a and Ni-pd2ap. The shoulder at 1571 cmꢁ1 from asymmetric
stretching vibrations of the b-propionate six-membered ring
proves that we isolated the Ni-pd2ap complex (see Supplemen-
tary). The absence of other absorptions at 1700–1750 cmꢁ1 show
that all carboxylate groups are coordinated.
1,3-propanediamine T ring makes LNiꢀ ꢀ ꢀOH2 energy interaction of
nickel(II) complexes lower than complexes imposed by E ring.
Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful to the Serbian Ministry of Science and
Education for the financial support (Project No. III41010). We also
´
appreciate Miss Tijana Matovic for her help in English.
Appendix A. Supplementary data
CCDC 900434 contains the supplementary crystallographic data
for this paper. These data can be obtained free of charge from The
article, such as hydrogen-bonding tables, IR spectra can be found,
3.5.2. Electronic absorption spectra of Ni(II) complexes with 1,3-pd3a-
type ligands
Electronic absorption spectra were given in Fig. 5. We observed
Ni-1,3-pd3a, Ni-1,3-pd2ap and Ni-ed3a or cis-polar-[Ni(1,3-
pnd3a)]ꢁ [39] (1,3-pnd3a stands for 1,3-pentanediamine-N,N,N0-
triacetate anion) for the purpose of comparison. In cases of Ni-
1,3-pd3a, Ni-1,3-pd2ap and Ni-1,3-pnd3a complexes containing
the six-membered 1,3-propanediamine ring, the expansion of the
first absorption band on the lower energy side is expected. This oc-
curs as a result of a less pronounced presence of the tetragonal li-
gand field (D4h model). The best spectral interpretation of Ni(II)
complexes can be achieved over (Oh) model: 3A2g ? 3T2g(F) (band
I), 3A2g ? 3T1g(F) (band III) and 3A2g ? 3T1g(P) (band IV) (Fig. 5).
Each compound contains shoulder at about 13000 cmꢁ1 (band
II) on a higher energy side of the spin-allowed transition (see Ta-
ble 6). This appearance occurs as a result of spin–orbital coupling.
The bands I, III and IV (usually reflecting an average ligand field
strength – LFS) of Ni-1,3-pd3a and Ni-1,3-pd2ap were compared to
the Ni-ed3a or Ni-1,3-pnd3a [39] complex. Generally, the bands
belonging to complexes with 1,3-propanediamine backbone are
moved to higher energy which means that they have a stronger li-
gand field. Comparing Ni-1,3-pd3a and Ni-ed3a complexes, LFS
shift occurs as a consequence of the presence of two carboxylate
rings in the equatorial plane that exert greater influence on d-orbi-
tal along the x and y axes. Less molar absorptivity of (1) and (2)
(see Table 6) with regards to the Ni-ed3a complex is a consequence
of the presence of a less rigid six-membered 1,3-propanediamine
ring.
References
[1] A. Sigel, H. Sigel, R.K.O. Sigel, Metal Ions in Life Sciences, second ed., Nickel and
Its Surprising Impact in Nature, John Wiley & Sons Ltd., 2007.
[2] K.K. Das, S.N. Das, S.A. Dhundasi, Indian J. Med. Res. 128 (2008) 412.
´
´
[3] V.D. Miletic, A. Meetsma, P.J. van Koningsbruggen, Z.D. Matovic, Inorg. Chem.
Commun. 12 (2009) 720.
´
´
´
´
[4] D.J. Radanovic, S. Ianelli, G. Pelosi, Z.D. Matovic, S. Tasic-Stojanovic, B.E.
Douglas, Inorg. Chim. Acta 278 (1998) 66.
[5] Z.D. Matovic
´, S. Ianelli, G. Pelosi, S.K. Janic´ijevic´, V.M. Ristanovic´, G. Ponticelli,
´
D.J. Radanovic, Polyhedron 21 (2002) 2667.
´
ˇ ´
´
[6] Z.D. Matovic´, V.D. Miletic´, M.M. Vasojevic´, M. Cvijovic´, S. Curcic, S.K. Beloševic,
Monatsh. Chem. 138 (2007) 823.
[7] Z.D. Matovic´, A. Meetsma, V.D. Miletic´, Petra J. van Koningsbruggen, Inorg.
Chim. Acta 360 (2007) 2420.
[8] G.H.Y. Lin, J.D. Leggett, R.M. Wing, Acta Crystallogr., Sect. B 29 (1973) 1023.
[9] T. Yamamoto, K. Mikata, K. Miyoshi, H. Yoneda, Inorg. Chim. Acta 150 (1988)
237.
[10] T. Mizuta, T. Yamamoto, N. Shibata, K. Miyoshi, Inorg. Chim. Acta 169 (1990)
257.
[11] M.J. Frisch, G.W. Trucks, H.B. Schlegel, G.E. Scuseria, M.A. Robb, J.R. Cheeseman,
G. Scalmani, V. Barone, B. Mennucci, G.A. Petersson, H. Nakatsuji, M. Caricato,
X. Li, H.P. Hratchian, A.F. Izmaylov, J. Bloino, G. Zheng, J.L. Sonnenberg, M.
Hada, M. Ehara, K. Toyota, R. Fukuda, J. Hasegawa, M. Ishida, T. Nakajima, Y.
Honda, O. Kitao, H. Nakai, T. Vreven, J.A. Montgomery Jr., J.E. Peralta, F. Ogliaro,
M. Bearpark, J.J. Heyd, E. Brothers, K.N. Kudin, V.N. Staroverov, R. Kobayashi, J.
Normand, K. Raghavachari, A. Rendell, J.C. Burant, S.S. Iyengar, J. Tomasi, M.
Cossi, N. Rega, J.M. Millam, M. Klene, J.E. Knox, J.B. Cross, V. Bakken, C. Adamo,
J. Jaramillo, R. Gomperts, R.E. Stratmann, O. Yazyev, A.J. Austin, R. Cammi, C.
Pomelli, J.W. Ochterski, R.L. Martin, K. Morokuma, V.G. Zakrzewski, G.A. Voth,
P. Salvador, J.J. Dannenberg, S. Dapprich, A.D. Daniels, Ö. Farkas, J.B. Foresman,
J.V. Ortiz, J. Cioslowski, D.J. Fox, GAUSSIAN 09, Revision A.1, GAUSSIAN
Wallingford, 2009.
[12] E.D. Glendening, J. Phys. Chem. A 109 (2005) 11936.
[13] K. Igi, B.E. Douglas, Inorg. Chem. 13 (1974) 425.
, Inc.,
4. Conclusion
[14] Bruker, SMART, SAINTPLUS and XPREP. Area Detector Control and Integration
In this paper, we reported the preparation of a new pentaden-
tate H31,3-pd2ap ligand and two new nickel(II) complexes: potas-
sium-(1,3-propanediamine-N,N,N0-triacetato(aquo))nickelate(II)
trihydrate, K[Ni(1,3-pd3a)(H2O)]ꢀ3H2O (1) and barium-bis[(1,3-
propanediamine-N,N0-diacetato-N-propionato)(aquo)nickelate(II)]-
dodecahydrate, Ba[Ni(1,3-pd2ap)(H2O)]2ꢀ12H2O (2), containing
five- and six-membered rings. Based on experimental data and
Software. Smart Apex Software Reference Manuals, Bruker Analytical X-ray
Instruments. Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA, 2000.
[15] G.M. Sheldrick, SADABS
. Version 2.03. Multi-Scan Absorption Correction
Program, University of Göttingen, Germany, 2001.
[16] A.J.M. Duisenberg, J. Appl. Crystallogr. 25 (1992) 92.
[17] A.L. Spek, J. Appl. Crystallogr. 21 (1988) 578.
[18] M.R. Snow, E.R.T. Tiekink, Acta Crystallogr. 44 (1988) 676.
[19] Y. Le Page, J. Appl. Crystallogr. 20 (1987) 264.
[20] Y. Le Page, J. Appl. Crystallogr. 21 (1988) 983.
DFT calculations, we found cis-polar geometry as
a favored
[21] M.C. Burla, R. Caliandro, M. Camalli, B. Carrozzini, G.L. Cascarano, L. De Caro, C.
Giacovazzo, G. Polidori, R. Spagna, J. Appl. Crystallogr. 38 (2005) 381.
[22] T. Hahn, Ed. International Tables for Crystallography, Space-group symmetry,
vol. A, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1983.
[23] HyperChem (TM), Hypercube; Inc., 1115 NW 4th Street, Gainesville, Florida
32601, USA.
[24] F. Weigend, R. Ahlrichs, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 7 (2005) 3297.
geometry for both complexes. The crystallographically verified
isomer for (1) also corresponds to the lowest energy structure
computed using DFT. The proposed cis-polar geometry for (1)
and (2) is consistent with the spectral results. NEDA analysis of
[NiL]ꢀ ꢀ ꢀ[water] adducts has been done. Charge Transfer (CT) and
Electrostatic component (ES) terms generaly define the difference
between total energy interactions. Therefore, [Ni(ed3a)]ꢀ ꢀ ꢀOH2 ad-
[26] E.D. Glendening, J.K. Badenhoop, A.E. Reed, J.E. Carpenter, J.A. Bohmann, C.M.
Morales, F. Weinhold, NBO 5.0, Theoretical Chemistry Institute, University of
Wisconsin, Madison, 2001.
duct show the bigest
D
E contribution ꢁ20.06 kcal/mol (Table 5).
The [Ni(1,3-pd2ap)]ꢀ ꢀ ꢀOH2 adduct is bound by 15.14 kcal/mol
which makes it the most affordable to release the water molecule
in potential substitution reaction. In addition, the presence of the
[27] A. Bondi, J. Phys. Chem. 68 (1964) 441.
´
[28] D. Radanovic, Coord. Chem. Rev. 54 (1984) 159.
[29] B.E. Douglas, D.J. Radanovic´, Coord. Chem. Rev. 128 (1993) 139.