´
L. G. Leon et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 17 (2007) 2681–2684
2684
´
(d) Padron, J. M.; Donadel, O. J.; Leon, L. G.; Martın, T.;
Martın, V. S. Lett. Drug Des. Discovery 2006, 3, 29; (e)
´
´
changes. Therefore, SW1573 and WiDr cells were
exposed for 24 h to the most active derivative 5f at drug
doses of 10 and 20 lM.11 The results are shown in Fig-
ure 3. For SW1573 cells exposed to 10 lM of derivative
5f, it was possible to observe a slight increase in the per-
centage of cells in the G2/M phase (25%) with respect to
control cells (11%). At the higher dose, the amount of
NSCLC cells in G2/M phase augmented to 38%. The rise
was concomitant with a decrease in the G0/G1 phase
compartment. Interestingly, the cell cycle arrest was
more evident for WiDr cells exposed to compound 5f.
Thus, the percentage of cells at G2/M was 53% and
81% after exposure to 10 and 20 lM, respectively. These
values are much larger than that of non-treated WiDr
cells, which was 11%. The results are in agreement with
those obtained in the antiproliferative study, showing a
remarkable selectivity of the new compound for the
more resistant colon cancer cell line WiDr.
´
´
´
´
Crisostomo, F. R. P.; Padron, J. M.; Martın, T.; Villar, J.;
Martın, V. S. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 1910; (f) Carrillo,
´
´
R.; Leon, L. G.; Martın, T.; Martın, V. S.; Padron, J. M.
Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2006, 16, 6135; (g) Carrillo, R.;
´
´
´
´
Leon, L. G.; Martın, T.; Martın, V. S.; Padron, J. M.
Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2007, 17, 780.
´
´
´
´
4. For recent examples, see: (a) Donadel, O. J.; Martın, T.;
Martın, V. S.; Padron, J. M. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett.
´
´
´
2007, 17, 18; (b) Ortega, N.; Martın, T.; Martın, V. S.
Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 871; (c) Crisostomo, F. R. P.;
´
´
´
´
Martın, T.; Martın, V. S. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 565; (d)
Pinacho Crisostomo, F. R.; Carrillo, R.; Leon, L. G.;
´
´
´
Martın, T.; Padron, J. M.; Martın, V. S. J. Org. Chem.
2006, 71, 2339.
´
´
´
´
5. (a) Miranda, P. O.; Dıaz, D. D.; Padron, J. I.; Ramırez,
M. A.; Martın, V. S. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 57; (b)
´
´
´
Miranda, P. O.; Ramırez, M. A.; Martın, V. S.; Padron, J.
I. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 1633.
´
´
´
´
6. Carballo, R. M.; Ramırez, M. A.; Rodrıguez, M. L.;
´
In summary, we have determined the antiproliferative
activity of a series of trans-2-alkyl-4-halopiperidines
and 2-alkyl-4-halo-1,2,5,6-tetrahydropyridines. Active
compounds showed a significant selectivity for the more
resistant cancer cell line WiDr. The halovinyl group
seems responsible for the enhanced activity of the pyri-
dine analogs when compared to piperidine derivatives.
A clear structure–activity relationship for chlorinated
and brominated derivatives was not observed. Cell cycle
arrest at G2/M was confirmed for the most active deriv-
ative. Ongoing studies on the mechanism of action will
be reported elsewhere.
´
Martın, V. S.; Padron, J. I. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 3837.
´
Martın, V. S. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 1979.
´
7. Miranda, P. O.; Dıaz, D. D.; Padron, J. I.; Bermejo, J.;
´
8. In this method, for each drug a dose–response curve is
generated and three levels of effect can be calculated, when
possible. The effect is defined as percentage of growth
(PG), where 50% growth inhibition (GI50), total growth
inhibition (TGI), and 50% cell killing (LC50) represent the
drug concentration at which PG is +50, 0, and –50,
respectively. Skehan, P.; Storeng, P.; Scudeiro, D.; Monks,
A.; McMahon, J.; Vistica, D.; Warren, J. T.; Bokesch, H.;
Kenney, S.; Boyd, M. R. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 1990, 82,
1107.
9. Pizao, P. E.; Peters, G. J.; van Ark-Otte, J.; Smets, L. A.;
Smitskamp-Wilms, E.; Winograd, B.; Pinedo, H. M.;
Giaccone, G. Eur. J. Cancer 1993, 29A, 1566.
Acknowledgments
10. Software-predicted lipophilicity of the compounds was
calculated with the program New ClogP accessible via
This research was supported by the EU INTERREG
IIIB-MAC initiative (05/MAC/2.5/C14 BIOPOLIS),
´
the Ministerio de Educacion y Ciencia of Spain, co-fi-
11. Cells were seeded in six-well plates at a density of 0.7–1 ·
106 cells/well. After 24 h, the products were added to the
respective well and incubated for an additional period of
24 h. Cells were trypsinized, harvested, transferred to test
tubes (12.75 mm), and centrifuged at 1500 rpm for 10 min.
The supernatant was discarded and the cell pellets were
resuspended in 200 ll of cold PBS and fixed by the addition
of 3 mL ice-cold 70% ethanol. Fixed cells were incubated
overnight at À20 ꢁC after which time were centrifuged at
1500 rpm for 10 min. The cell pellets were resuspended in
500 ll PBS. Then, 20 ll of DNAse-free RNAse (200 ll/ml)
and 10 ll of propidium iodide (40 ll/ml) were sequentially
added. The mixture was incubated in the dark at 37 ꢁC
for 30 min. Flow cytometric determination of DNA content
(25,000 cells/sample) was analyzed by FACSCalibur
nanced by the European Regional Development Fund
(CTQ2005-09074-C02-01/BQU) and the Canary Islands
Government. R.M.C. thanks the Spanish MEC for an
FPU fellowship. J.I.P. and J.M.P. thank the Spanish
´
MEC-FSE for Ramon y Cajal contracts.
References and notes
1. Faulkner, D. J. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2002, 19, 1, and earlier
reviews in the same series.
2. Mayer, A. M. S.; Gustafson, K. R. Eur. J. Cancer 2006,
42, 2241, and references therein.
´
3. (a) Donadel, O. J.; Martın, T.; Martın, V. S.; Villar, J.;
Padron, J. M. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2005, 15, 3536; (b)
´
´
´
Flow Cytometer (Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA, USA).
´
Miranda, P. O.; Padron, J. M.; Padron, J. I.; Villar, J.;
Martın, V. S. Chem. Med. Chem. 2006, 1, 323; (c)
´
The fractions of the cells in G0/G1, S, and G2/M phase
in addition to apoptosis were analyzed using cell cycle
analysis software, ModFit LT 3.0 (Verity Software House,
Topsham, ME, USA).
´
´
Miranda, P. O.; Leon, L. G.; Martın, V. S.; Padron, J.
I.; Padron, J. M. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2006, 16, 3135;
´
´
´