P. V. Kiem et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 21 (2011) 633–637
637
water (F3, 127.5 g) extracts after removing solvent in vacuo. The F1 extract was
chromatographed on a silica gel column and eluted with n-hexane–acetone
gradient (100:1–1:1, v/v) to obtain fractions F1A–F1D. The F1B fraction was
chromatographed on a silica gel column eluting with CHCl3–MeOH (30:1, v/v)
to yield 12 (10.0 mg) and 14 (8.0 mg). The F1C fraction was further
chromatographed on a silica gel column eluting with CH2Cl2–MeOH (15:1, v/
v) to give fractions F1C1–F1C3. The F1C1 fraction was chromatographed on an
YMC RP-18 column eluting with acetone–water (10:1, v/v) to yield 13 (5.0 mg).
The F1C3 fraction was chromatographed on a silica gel column eluting with
MeOH–water (5:1, v/v) to yield 9 (7.1 mg). The F2 extract was chromato-
19. Markham, K. R.; Wallace, J. W.; Babu, Y. N.; Murty, V. K.; Rao, M. G.
Phytochemistry 1989, 28, 299.
20. Cutillo, F.; Dellagreca, M.; Previtera, L.; Zarrelli, A. Nat. Prod. Res. 2005, 19,
99.
21. Lee, E. H.; Kim, H. J.; Song, Y. S.; Jin, C.; Lee, K. T.; Cho, J.; Lee, Y. S. Arch. Pharm.
Res. 2003, 26, 1018.
22. Takeda, Y.; Zhang, H.; Matsumoto, T.; Otsuka, H.; Oosio, Y.; Honda, G.; Tabata,
M.; Fujita, T.; Sun, H.; Sezik, E.; Yesilada, E. Phytochemistry 1997, 44, 117.
23. Cai, Y.; Evans, F. J.; Roberts, M. F.; Phillipson, J. D.; Zenk, M. H.; Gleba, Y. Y.
Phytochemistry 1991, 30, 2033.
graphed on
a
silica gel column and eluted with CHCl3–MeOH gradient
24. Lin, C. N.; Kuo, S. H.; Chung, M. I. J. Nat. Prod. 1997, 60, 851.
25. Rayyan, S.; Fossen, T.; Nateland, H. S.; Andersen, Ø. M. Phytochem. Anal. 2005,
16, 334.
26. Hosoya, T.; Yun, Y. S.; Kunugi, A. Tetrahedron 2005, 61, 7037.
27. Kiem, P. V.; Minh, C. V.; Dat, N. T.; Cai, X. F.; Lee, J. J.; Kim, Y. H. Arch. Pharm. Res.
2003, 26, 1014.
28. Takeda, Y.; Okada, Y.; Masuda, T.; Hirata, E.; Shinzato, T.; Takushi, A.; Yu, Q.;
Otsuka, H. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 2000, 48, 752.
29. Sueyoshi, E.; Liu, H.; Matsunami, K.; Otsuka, H.; Shinzato, T.; Aramoto, M.;
Takeda, Y. Phytochemistry 2006, 67, 2483.
(50:1?1:1, v/v) to obtain fractions F2A–F2D. The F2B fraction was
chromatographed on an YMC RP-18 column eluting with MeOH–H2O (10:1,
v/v) to yield 2 (6.3 mg) and 3 (12.0 mg). The F2C fraction was chromatographed
on a silica gel column eluting with CHCl3–MeOH (7:1, v/v) to give fractions
F2C1–F2C3. The F2C1 traction was chromatographed on an YMC RP-18 column
eluting with MeOH–water (5:1, v/v) to yield 4 (5.0 mg) and 5 (11.5 mg). The
F2D fraction was chromatographed on a silica gel column eluting with CH2Cl2–
MeOH–H2O (6:1:0.07, v/v/v) to yield 7 (6.0 mg). The water soluble fraction F3
was chromatographed on a Diaion HP-20P column (Mitsubishi Chem. Ind. Co.,
Tokyo, Japan) eluting with water containing increasing concentrations of
MeOH (0%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and 100% MeOH) to give four fractions, F3A–F3D. The
F3B fraction was chromatographed on a silica gel column eluting with CHCl3–
MeOH–H2O (5:1:0.1, v/v/v) to give fractions, F3B1–F3B3. The F3B2 fraction was
30. Otsuka, H.; Kamada, K.; Ogimi, C.; Hirata, E.; Takushi, A.; Takeda, Y.
Phytochemistry 1994, 35, 1331.
31. Chang, I. M.; Yun, H. S.; Yamasaki, K. Korean J. Pharmacogn. 1981, 12, 12.
32. Jung, K.; Chin, Y. W.; Kim, Y. C.; Kim, J. Arch. Pharm. Res. 2005, 28, 1381.
33. The ORAC assay was carried out on a Tecan GENios multi-functional plate
reader with fluorescent filters using excitation and emission wavelengths of
485 and 535 nm, respectively. In the final assay mixture, 40 nM fluorescein
chromatographed on
a silica gel column eluting with CH2Cl2–MeOH–H2O
(5:1:0.1, v/v/v) to yield the new compound 8 (4.5 mg). The F3B3 fraction was
chromatographed on a silica gel column eluting with CH2Cl2–acetone–H2O
(1:2.5:0.1, v/v/v) to yield the new compound 1 (4.0 mg). The F3D fraction was
chromatographed on a silica gel column using CH2Cl2–MeOH–H2O (6:1:0.05, v/
v/v) to give fractions F3D1–F3D4. The F3D2 fraction was further separated on
an YMC RP-18 column eluting with acetone–MeOH–H2O (1:1:2, v/v/v) to yield
10 (5.0 mg) and 11 (8.0 mg). The F3D4 fraction was separated on an YMC RP-18
column eluting with MeOH–H2O (1:2, v/v) to yield 6 (5.5 mg).
was used as
a target of free radical attack with 20 mM 2,2-azobis
dihydrochloride (AAPH) as a peroxyl radical generator in a peroxyl radical-
scavenging capacity (ORACROOÅ) assay. Trolox (1 mM) was used as a control
standard and prepared fresh daily. The analyzer was programmed to record the
fluorescence of fluorescein every 2 min after addition of AAPH or H2O2–CuSO4.
All fluorescence measurements were expressed relative to the initial reading.
Final results were calculated based on the difference in the area under the
fluorescence decay curve between the blank and each sample. ORACROOÅ was
expressed as micromoles of Trolox equivalents (TE). One ORAC unit is
equivalent to the net protection area provided by 1 mM of Trolox.
34. Wolfe, K. L.; Liu, R. H. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2008, 56, 8404.
17. Each compound (1 and 8, 2.0 mg) was dissolved in 1.0 N HCl (dioxane–H2O,
1:1, v/v, 1.0 mL) and then heated to 80 °C in a water bath for 3 h. The acidic
solution was neutralized with silver carbonate and the solvent thoroughly
driven out under N2 gas overnight. After extraction with CHCl3, the aqueous
layer was concentrated to dryness using N2 gas. The residue was dissolved in
0.1 mL of dry pyridine, and then
L
-cysteine methyl ester hydrochloride in
35. Hoyweghen, L. V.; Karalic, I.; Calenbergh, S. V.; Deforce, D.; Heyerick, A. J. Nat.
Prod. 2010, 73, 1573.
pyridine (0.06 M, 0.1 mL) was added to the solution. The reaction mixture
was heated at 60 °C for 2 h, and 0.1 mL of trimethylsilylimidazole solution was
added, followed by heating at 60 °C for 1.5 h. The dried product was
partitioned with n-hexane and H2O (0.1 mL, each), and the organic layer
was analyzed by GC: Column: column of SPB-1 (0.25 ꢁ 30 m); detector FID,
column temp 210 °C, injector temp 270 °C, detector temp 300 °C, carrier gas He
(2.0 mL/min). The retention times of persilylated glucose, apiose, and arabinose
were founded to be 14.11, 6.70, and 9.16 min, respectively, when compared
with the standard solutions prepared by the same reaction from the standard
36. The 40
lL of different concentrations of the compounds in distilled water were
mixed with 160
lL of the mixture containing 0.5 mM CuCl2 and 0.75 mM
neocuproine in 10 mM phosphate buffer, pH 7.4. The absorbance was
measured with a micro-plate reader at 454 nm for 1 h. Increased absorbance
of the reaction mixture indicates increased reducing capacity.
37. One hundreds micro-liters of different concentration of the compounds were
mixed with 100
mixture solution was added to 100
l
L
of 0.1
l
M
CuSO4. After one hundreds micro-liters of
L of 0.1 M calcein, the fluorescence of
l
l
monosaccharides. The retention times of persilylated
-apiose, -apiose, -arabinose, and -arabinose were 14.11, 14.26, 6.70, 6.95,
4.72, and 9.16 min, respectively.
D
-glucose,
L
-glucose,
mixture solution was measured using a Tecan GENios multi-functional plate
reader with fluorescent filters (excitation wavelength: 485 nm and emission
filter: 535 nm) and compared to the fluorescence intensity of control which
contained only calcein.
D
L
D
L
18. Kanchanapoom, T.; Sirikatitham, A.; Otsuka, H.; Ruchirawat, S. J. Asian Nat.
Prod. Res. 2006, 8, 747.