4
Tetrahedron
and thereby remains near constant in its electron density. On
have dipolar-dipolar interaction with the solvents. In the
corresponding sodium carboxylate, which lacks the
intramolecular hydrogen bonding, the carbonyl carbons in both
the ester group and carboxylate group showed the downfield
shift, indicating solider dipolar interaction with the solvents (Fig.
9b).
N
the other hand, the downfield shifts with increase of ET were
more clearly observed for both the carbonyl carbons in the
carboxylate 14. These results indicate that both the C=O carbons
were affected by polarity of the solvent due to lack of the
intramolecular hydrogen bonding in the sodium carboxylate, 14.
Conclusions
The 13C NMR spectroscopic studies were performed in
various solvents for carbonyl compounds, including
hydroxybenzoic acids (1 and 2), which have a hydroxyl group
and a carboxyl group, acetoxybenzoic acids (5 and 6), which
have an acetoxy group and a carboxyl group, and half esters (9,
10, 11, and 13), which have a carboalkoxy group and a carboxyl
group for observation of their behaviors of carbonyl carbons in
solutions. It was found that in hydroxybenzoic acids (1 and 2),
polar solvents interact with the carbonyl group of the carboxyl
group. When the hydroxyl group and the carboxyl group form
intramolecular hydrogen bonding, or when the carboxyl group
forms intermolecular hydrogen bonding, the NMR solvents show
dipolar interaction with the carbonyl group in the carboxyl
groups because of the change of the electron density of the
carbonyls as depicted in Fig.8. In the acetoxy benzoic acid (5
and 6), the carboxyl group forms intermolecular hydrogen
bonding and interact with the solvent by dipolar-dipolar
interaction. The acetoxy group also exhibits dipolar interaction
with the solvents, leading to decrease of the electron densities of
the carbonyls and causing the downfield shifts in the 13C NMR
chemical shifts.
Fig. 9. Interaction of half esters with solvents (a) linear half esters
and their carboxylates, (b) half ester 13 having intramolecular
hydrogen bonding and its carboxylate 14
In summary, our 13C NMR spectroscopic analysis revealed
interactions of the carbonyl groups with a variety of solvents with
different polarity. Among the conceivable forces, it appears that
intramolecular hydrogen bonding has especially notable effects
on electron densities of carbonyl carbons compared to
intermolecular hydrogen bonding or dipole interaction from
solvent molecules, leading to near-constant 13C NMR chemical
shift regardless of polarity of the solvents. Intermolecular
hydrogen bonding and dipolar-dipolar interaction with the
surrounding solvent molecules appear to be competing with each
other, leading to irregular chemical shift changes when these two
N
forces countervail or to downfield shifts with the increase of ET
when the latter surpasses.
Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful for the financial support from the
Strategic Research Foundation Grant-aided Project for Private
Universities (MEXT), Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research
(JSPS) (YH), Tokyo Ohka Foundation for the Promotion of
Science and Technology (SN), OHARA Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd.
(SN), and KAJIMA Foundation (SN).
Fig. 8. Interaction of hydroxybenzoic acids (1 and 2) and
acetoxybenzoic acids (5 and 6) with solvents
In half-esters, the polar interaction with the solvents was
observed primarily with the ester carbonyl carbons, leading to
decrease of the electron densities hence the downfield shifts of
the 13C NMR chemical shifts. These downfield shifts by the
polar solvents were observed more clearly for both the carbonyls
in the corresponding sodium carboxylates (Fig. 9a). On the other
hand, in the half-esters having intramolecular hydrogen bonding
such as the half ester 13, the electron density of the ester
carbonyl carbon did not change noticeably by the solvent
polarities. However, as the carboxyl carbonyl carbon showed
some downfield shifts in the 13C NMR chemical shifts with the
increase of the solvent polarity, the carboxyl group appeared to
References and notes
1. Abraham, M. H.: Abraham, R. J.; Acree, Jr, W. E.; Aliv, A. E.;
Leo, A. J.; Whaley, W. L. J. Org. Chem. 2014, 79, 11075-11083.
2. Zhao, X. R.; Shen, Q. J.; Jin, W. J. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2013,566,
60-66.
3. (a) Bother-By, A. A.; Glick, R. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1956, 78,
1071-1072. (b) Bother-By, A. A. J. Mol. Spectroscopy 1960, 5,
52-61. (c) Buckingham, A. D.; Schaefer, T.; Schneider, W. G. J.
Chem. Phys. 1960, 32, 1227-1233. (d) Maciel, G. E.; Ruben, G. C.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1963, 85, 3903-3904. (e) Llinás, M.; Wilson, D.
M.; Klevin, P. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1977, 99, 6846-6850. (f)