054317-8
Subramanian et al.
J. Chem. Phys. 123, 054317 ͑2005͒
We note that the agreement of the structural parameters
for Kraitchman analysis, DFT calculations, and least-squares
fit are well within the experimental error limits. The value
from the Fe atom to the center of the Cp ring. Using the
result for r͑Fe–Cp͒ from our earlier paper,18 r͑Fe–Cp͒
=1.6585−0.0821⌺I, and substituting the value for ⌺
I
=0.35 for the –CHO group,11 one determines the r͑Fe-Cp͒
distance to be 1.630 Å. This value falls within 1% of the
experimental gas-phase microwave value of 1.647͑2͒ Å and
adds further support for the validity of this correlation analy-
sis. This study also confirms that our previous correlations of
structural trends with substituent properties are reasonably
quantitative and fit experimental results within the experi-
mental uncertainties.
obtained for C1–C1 bond distance from Kraitchman is
Ј
slightly lower than the DFT and structural fit values, whereas
x-ray diffraction6 studies overestimate this bond length. The
difference between the Kraitchman and least-squares-fit val-
ues may be an indication of correlation effects in the fit, and
in this case we would favor the Kraitchman-derived value.
The experimental and DFT-calculated structures ob-
tained for the FcCHO molecule show that the Cp rings are in
an eclipsed conformation. However, in the case of ferrocene,
the Cp rings are staggered in the crystal33 and eclipsed in the
gas phase.34 Attempts to perform a least-squares fit using a
staggered conformation as a starting point did not converge,
and this is consistent with the prediction from the theoretical
calculations that the staggered conformation has a much
higher energy when compared to the eclipsed conformer. A
single-point energy calculation predicts the difference in en-
ergy between eclipsed and staggered conformer to be
4 kJ/mol, with the eclipsed conformer being more stable.
This calculation was done using the rB3PW91 method and
using the Stuttgart RSC1997 ECP for iron and the SVP basis
set for the carbon, oxygen, and hydrogen atoms.
In conclusion, the near-complete gas-phase structure of
FcCHO has been obtained using microwave spectroscopy.
The present work also indicates that this compound exists in
the gas phase as an eclipsed conformer, with a small tilt of
the aldehyde group away from the Fe atom of only 0.3͑2͒°
and Hald is displaced towards the Fe atom by 0.29͑4͒ Å. The
present work also supports the previously obtained coherent
picture of the effect of substituent effects on the structure of
ferrocene.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This material is based on the work supported by the
National Science Foundation under Grant No. CHE-
0304969. This support from the National Science Foundation
is gratefully acknowledged. One of the authors ͑P.A.C.͒
gratefully acknowledges support from a NASA Arizona
Space Grant internship during the course of this project. We
thank Oliver Indris, Jennifer Dannemiller, and Kirsten Fields
for help in obtaining data on the normal isotopomer.
The tilt angle is defined to be the angle that the substitu-
ent ͑in our case, the bond C1–C1 ͒ makes with the carbon
Ј
plane of the substituted Cp ring. From previous studies in
this lab, this angle has been consistently shown to have a
nonzero value, in the direction away from the Fe atom. In the
case of chloroferrocene,15 the value of the tilt angle is
2.7͑6͒°, for dimethylferrocene,16 the value of this angle is
2.66͑2͒°, and for ethynylferrocene,18 the value of this angle
is 2.75͑6͒°. According to the present best-fit results for Fc-
CHO, we found that the tilt angle determined from the least-
squares fit is 0.3͑2͒°, in the direction away the Fe atom. This
1 P. D. Beer, D. B. Crowe, M. I. Odgen, M. G. B. Drew, and B. Main, J.
Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. 14, 2107 ͑1993͒.
2 A. Heller, Acc. Chem. Res. 23, 128 ͑1990͒.
3 C. Xu, H. Cai, P. He, and Y. Fang, Fresenius’ J. Anal. Chem. 367, 593
͑2000͒.
4 G. Wilkinson, J. Organomet. Chem. 100, 273 ͑1975͒.
5 G. Wilkinson, M. Rosenblum, M. C. Whiting, and R. B. Woodward, J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 74, 5764 ͑1952͒.
indicates that the substituent ͑in this case C1 ͒ almost lies in
Ј
the plane of the substituted Cp ring. However, the ab initio
calculation using the method B3PW91 and basis set Stuttgart
RSC 1997 ECP described in Sec. III predicts the tilt angle to
be 2.8° in the direction towards the Fe atom and the x-ray
diffraction6 study indicates the tilt angle is 4° in the direction
towards the Fe atom ͑see Table VII͒. Nevertheless, according
to our previous results for chloroferrocene ͓a substituted fer-
6 M. F. Daniel, A. J. Leadbetter, and M. A. Mazid, J. Chem. Soc., Faraday
Trans. 2 77, 1837 ͑1981͒.
7 M. F. Daniel, A. J. Leadbetter, R. E. Meads, and W. G. Parker, J. Chem.
Soc., Faraday Trans. 2 74, 456 ͑1978͒.
8 M. F. Daniel, A. J. Leadbetter, and R. M. Richardson, J. Chem. Soc.,
Faraday Trans. 2 77, 1851 ͑1981͒.
9 B. Wrackmeyer, O. L. Tok, A. Ayazi, H. E. Maizel, and M. Herberhold,
Magn. Reson. Chem. 42, 827 ͑2004͒.
rocene with
a
strongly electron-withdrawing group,
10 B. Wrackmeyer, O. L. Tok, and A. A. Koridze, Magn. Reson. Chem. 42,
750 ͑2004͒.
tilt angle=2.7͑6͒° away from Fe atom͔, we believe that the
tilt away from the Fe atom is a reasonable result. We also
found that the Hald atom of the aldehyde group ͑–CHO͒ is
displaced towards the Fe atom by 0.29͑4͒ Å.
11 R. M. G. Roberts and J. Silver, J. Organomet. Chem. 263, 235 ͑1984͒.
12 T. Matsumura-Inoue, K. Kuroda, Y. Umezawa, and Y. Achiba, J. Chem.
Soc., Faraday Trans. 2 85, 857 ͑1989͒.
13 J. C. Green, Struct. Bonding ͑Berlin͒ 43, 37 ͑1981͒.
14 B. J. Drouin, T. G. Lavaty, P. A. Cassak, and S. G. Kukolich, J. Chem.
Phys. 107, 6541 ͑1997͒.
The linear correlation between the distance between the
Fe atom and the center of the Cp, r͑Fe–Cp͒, and the Ham-
15 B. J. Drouin, J. J. Dannemiller, and S. G. Kukolich, J. Chem. Phys. 112,
747 ͑2000͒.
mett parameter ⌺ was presented in an earlier paper by our
I
group.18 We ascribe this linear correlation to the electron-
withdrawing effects of the substituent group relative to the H
atom, which alters the electron density of the Cp ring. There
is a decrease in electron density of the Cp ring as the elec-
tronegativity of the substituent group increases. This affects
the binding of the Fe--Cp ligand and is observed as an
increase in the binding energy35 and ionization energy of the
complex, and structurally as the variation of the distance
16 D. S. Margolis, C. Tanjaroon, and S. G. Kukolich, J. Chem. Phys. 117,
3741 ͑2002͒.
17 C. Tanjaroon, K. S. Keck, and S. G. Kukolich, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126,
844 ͑2004͒.
18 R. Subramanian, C. Karunatilaka, K. S. Keck, and S. G. Kukolich, Inorg.
Chem. 44, 3137 ͑2005͒.
19 U. T. Mueller-Westerhoff, Z. Yang, and G. Ingram, J. Organomet. Chem.
463, 163 ͑1993͒.
20 R. E. Bumgarner and S. G. Kukolich, J. Chem. Phys. 86, 1083 ͑1987͒.