Journal of the American Chemical Society
Article
wavelength of FI-A(2NH2I)VE compared to IR780-A-
(2NH2I)VE are potentially attributed to the organization of
IR780 moiety along the nanofibrils. Combining the fluo-
rescence results with morphological studies demonstrates
creation of a morphology-transformable supramolecular
probe FI-A(2NI)VE, in which the NTR-reduction of A(2NI)
in Fmoc-A(2NI)VE and IR780-A(2NI)VE is attributed to the
morphological transition of the nanostructures and recovery of
the emission of IR780 moieties, respectively (Figure 5G). In
addition, the selectivity of the probe toward NTR was
estimated by carrying out the fluorescence studies in the
presence of biological internal interference agents (Figure 5F
and Figure S39). Addition of reductants glutathione and
ascorbic acid, glucose, hydrogen peroxide, or metal ions Na+,
K+, Ca2+, and Mg2+ into the solution of FI-A(2NI)VE induced
negligible change of the fluorescence intensity of the IR780
moiety within the coassemblies. These results suggest the
selectivity of the supramolecular probe responsive to enzyme
NTR, thus demonstrating great potential in NTR detection.
The NTR-specific fluorescence of the supramolecular probe
inspired us to estimate its capability for the bioimaging of
tumor cells under hypoxic condition based on overexpression
of NTR within the hypoxia region (Figure 6). MTT assays
revealed that treating normal mouse fibroblast 3T3 and breast
tumor 4T1 cells with probe FI-A(2NI)VE and reduced
counterpart FI-A(2NH2I)VE did not lead to an apparent
decrease of cell viability, indicating the excellent biocompat-
ibility of the supramolecular probe (Figure S41). During the
bioimaging studies of tumor cells, 4T1 cells were incubated
under the hypoxic or normoxic condition in the presence of
to the inhibited activity of enzyme NTR. The remaining
fluorescence signals might be attributed to the remaining
activity of NTR in the presence of dicoumarin. The results
suggest that the fluorescence signal in the mice administrated
with FI-A(2NI)VE is attributed to the NTR-reduction of the
A(2NI) residue. At 12 h after subcutaneous injection, the
tumor tissues and major organs were dissected from the mice
and ex vivo fluorescence imaging was performed (Figure 6C).
The primary fluorescence signals were detected at the tumor
and liver tissues dissected from the mice administrated with FI-
A(2NI)VE. In contrast, the ex vivo images showed pretty weak
fluorescence signals at the tumor tissues from the mice
administrated with FI-A(2NH2I)VE or FI-A(2NI)VE +
dicoumarin (Figure 6E), arising from the poor tumor
accumulation and inhibited NTR-activity, respectively. In
particular, CLSM images of the frozen sections of the tumor
tissues from the mice administrated with FI-A(2NI)VE
showed strong fluorescence signals associated with IR-780
moieties at the deep region (Figure 6F). However, the tumor
tissues from the mice treated with FI-A(2NH2I)VE displayed
pretty weak fluorescence signals around the tumor tissues.
These results suggest the improved tumor accumulation and
penetration of the supramolecular probe. Eventually, the in vivo
and ex vivo fluorescence imaging studies demonstrate the
excellent capability of the supramolecular probes for efficient
fluorescence imaging of the solid tumors in mice.
We further unraveled the mechanism for the tumor
accumulation and penetration of the supramolecular probes
involving one counterpart probe FI-A(2NI/2NH2I)VE (Figure
6F and Figure S45). The probe FI-A(2NI/2NH2I)VE was
created via coassembling Fmoc-A(2NI)VE with IR780-A-
(2NH2I)VE with a constant ratio for the assembling and
fluorescent components in FI-A(2NI)VE. AFM and TEM
images of FI-A(2NI/2NH2I)VE revealed the nanofibrous
S37), which is attributed to the strong assembling propensity
of the Fmoc-A(2NI)VE component. The emission intensity of
the IR780 moieties within FI-A(2NI/2NH2I)VE is comparable
to that of FI-A(2NI)VE treated with NTR and NADPH
(Figure S40), indicating the negligible intermolecular PET
process between the IR780 and nitroimidazole moieties within
the coassemblies and thereby serving as the intrinsic
fluorescence nanofibrous probe. CLSM image of FI-A(2NI/
2NH2I)VE confirmed formation of nanofibrils with strong red
fluorescence signals (Figure S38), directly supporting the
coassembly of Fmoc-A(2NI)VE with IR780-A(2NH2I)VE into
the nanofibrils. Therefore, we hypothesize that simultaneously
administrating the tumor-bearing mice with the nanofiber
probe FI-A(2NI/NH2I)VE and NTR-inhibitor dicoumarin
potentially allows for maintenance of the in vivo property of the
nanofibrous probe and also prevention of its morphological
transformation due to the inhibited NTR activity. As a
consequence, CLSM images of the frozen sections of the
tumor tissues dissected from the mice administrated with FI-
A(2NI)VE + dicoumarin only showed poor signals around the
edge of the tumor tissues (Figure 6F). This result confirms the
critical role of the nanofibrous morphology in tumor
accumulation of the nanofiber probes, as well as the
mechanism of the morphological transition for the tumor
penetration of the nanofibrous probe promoted by the NTR-
reduction of nitro groups. Hence, these CLSM results directly
demonstrate the tumor accumulation and penetration of the
probe FI-A(2NI)VE, in which the hypoxic condition was
59,60
generated by a conventional chemical inducer CoCl2
and
thereby allowing for the expression of NTR by 4T1 cells and
rendering the enzyme responsive for the probe. Incubation of
4T1 cells with probe FI-A(2NI)VE under the hypoxic
condition resulted in strong red fluorescence signals associated
with the IR780 moiety detected by confocal laser scanning
microscopy (CLSM), whereas the cells treated the probe
under the normoxic condition did not give rise to apparent
fluorescence signals (Figure 6A and Figure S42). However,
incubation of 4T1 cells with FI-A(2NH2I)VE showed apparent
red signals associated with IR780 moieties due to the
recovered fluorescence of IR 780 (Figure S43). These results
directly suggest the internalization of the probe by tumor cells
and the fluorescence emission of the probe induced by NTR-
reduction for selective bioimaging of hypoxic tumor cells.
We subsequently carried out the in vivo bioimaging of tumor
cells in the hypoxic region via subcutaneous injection of the
probe into 4T1 breast tumor-bearing mice (Figure 6B). In vivo
fluorescence imaging of the mice administrated with FI-
A(2NI)VE detected apparent fluorescence signals associated
with IR780 moieties around tumor tissues during a long period
(Figure 6D), indicating the efficient fluorescence imaging of
the solid tumors by the supramolecular probes. However, the
tumor tissues in the mice treated with FI-A(2NH2I)VE did not
exhibit obvious fluorescence signals, suggesting its poor
accumulation at tumor sites. These results imply the improved
accumulation of the NTR-responsive supramolecular probes at
tumor sites compared to the intrinsic fluorescence probes. In
addition, in the group of the mice simultaneously adminis-
trated with FI-A(2NI)VE and dicoumarin that is a conven-
tional inhibitor for NTR,61 the tumor tissues displayed rather
poor fluorescence signals associated with IR780 moieties, due
H
J. Am. Chem. Soc. XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX