5786
J. Monfray et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 44 (2003) 5785–5787
Scheme 2. Reagents and conditions: (a) Me3SiCH2MgCl, CeCl3, THF, rt, 3 days; (b) Pd(OH)2, H2, MeOH, H2O, AcOH, THF,
24 h; (c) HCl 1N, diethyl ether, 0°C, 1–24 h.
In a first step, the cerium reagent derived from cerium
chloride and trimethylsilylmethylmagnesium chloride4
was reacted with the ester group of the starting materials
to result in the formation of the tertiary alcohols 26 with
very good yields. The aqueous acidic workup of the
reaction had to be performed in mild conditions (HCl 1N,
t<−5°C for 1 h) to prevent elimination of trimethylsilanol.
Debenzylation of 2 was performed at room temperature
under hydrogen (3.5 atm) with Pearlman’s catalyst to give
aminoalcohols37 ingenerallygoodtoexcellentyields. The
relatively moderate yields in the phenyl substituted
compound 3e have been attributed to partial cleavage of
the molecule under the hydrogenolysis conditions. In the
last step, tertiary alcohols 3 were treated with HCl 1N
at 0°C for 1–24 h to give aminoallylsilanes 48 in good to
excellent yields. The results are summarized in Table 2.
In conclusion, we have described the enantioselective
synthesis of original 2-(2-aminoethyl)allylsilanes in three
steps with good overall yields. These compounds will be
used as new chiral starting materials for the synthesis of
piperidine natural products.
References
1. (a) Strunz, G. M.; Findlay, J. A. In The Alkaloids; Brossi,
A., Ed.; Academic Press: New York, 1985; Vol. 26, p. 89;
(b) Angle, S. R.; Breitenbucher, J. G. In Studies in Natural
Products; Atta-ur-Rahman, Ed.; Elsevier Science: Amster-
dam, 1995; Vol. 16, p. 453; (c) Bailey, P. D.; Millwood, P.
A.; Smith, P. D. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1998,
633–640.
2. Cellier, M.; Gelas-Mialhe, Y.; Husson, H.-P.; Perrin, B.;
Remuson, R. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2000, 11, 3913–
3919.
3. Chalard, P.; Remuson, R.; Gelas-Mialhe, Y.; Gramain,
J.-C.; Canet, I. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 1661–1664 and
references cited therein.
4. Bardot, V.; Gelas-Mialhe, Y.; Gramain, J.-C.; Remuson,
R. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1997, 8, 1111–1114.
Table 2. Preparation of compounds 2, 3, and 4
Aminoester Product 2
Product 3
Product 4
1
Yield (%)
Yield (%)
92
Yield (%)
[h]D
(3R,aR)-1a
(3S,aS)-1a
(3R,aR)-1b
(3S,aS)-1b
(3R,aR)-1c
(3S,aS)-1c
(3R,aR)-1d
(3S,aS)-1d
(3S,aR)-1e
(3R,aS)-1e
90
86
76
72
82
71
51
73
71
68
93
+20
(c 0.9;
CHCl3)
−21
(c 1.1;
CHCl3)
+22
(c 1.1;
CHCl3)
−21
(c 0.9;
CHCl3)
+18
(c 1.3;
CHCl3)
−16
(c 1.9;
CHCl3)
+12
(c 1,2;
CHCl3)
−13
(c 1.0;
CHCl3)
−10a
5. Davies, S. G.; Ichihara, O. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1991,
2, 183–186.
91
83
80
88
89
80
82
37
44
Quant.
75
6. General procedure for preparation of 2: Powdered
CeCl3·7H2O (4.6 equiv.) was dried under vacuum (0.05
mmHg) for 3 days at 120°C while stirring. The flask was
flushed with argon, then dry THF (110 ml) was added to
form a white suspension which was stirred at room tem-
perature for an additional 2 h. This slurry was cooled to
−78°C and trimethylsilylmethylmagnesium chloride (4.6
equiv.) in THF was added dropwise over a period of 1–2
h. The cold mixture was stirred for 1 h and the ester (0.01
mol) in THF (10 ml) was added dropwise over 30 min.
The resulting mixture was allowed to warm to room
temperature and stirred for 3 days. The reaction mixture
was then cooled to −10°C and hydrolyzed by dropwise
addition of 1 M hydrochloric acid. The layers were sepa-
rated and the aqueous layer was extracted with
diethylether. The combined organic layers were dried
(MgSO4) and concentrated. The crude product was
purified by flash chromatography. (3R,aR)-2a: 1H NMR
(400 MHz, CDCl3): l 7.18–7.50 (m, 10H); 6.35 (s, 1H);
3.97 (q, 1H, J=7.0 Hz); 3.81 (AB system, 2H, Dw=185
Hz, JAB=12.8 Hz); 3.34 (m, 1H), 2.03, (t, 1H, J=13 Hz),
1.42 (d, 3H, J=7.0 Hz), 1.14 (d, 3 H, J=6.5 Hz), 1.07 (dd,
1H, J=13 Hz, J=1.9 Hz); 0.84 (AB system, 2H, Dw=43
Hz, JAB=14.8 Hz; 0.12 (AB system, 2H, Dw=234 Hz,
89
Quant.
84
75
78
94
(c 0.7;
CHCl3)
+9a
(c 1.0;
CHCl3)
90
J
AB=14.8 Hz), 0.07 (s, 9H); −0.14 (s, 9H). 13C NMR (100
MHz, CDCl3): l 142.6; 139.2; 129.8; 129.1; 128.7; 128.4;
a The enantiomeric purity was determined by HPLC using a Chiralcel
OD column (ee(3S,aR)-1e=84%, ee(3R,aS)-1e=80%).