C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
nickel (II) hydride complex (f). Subsequent olefin insertion and
isocyanide insertion gives hydrocarbation product 3.
The hydride mechanism is supported by the following observa-
tions: Isotope labeling experiments by using d4-ethylene or
[Ni(triphos)C(D)N(D)xylyl]2+(CF3SO3-)2 showed deuterium at both
the methylene group and the methyl group of the R-ethyl carbene
3.10 The alkene pathways (either form metallocycle or carbocation)
would not give a mixed result.
When ethylene was bubbled into the hydrocarbation product of
propene [Ni(triphos)C(CH2CH2CH3)N(H)xylyl]2+(BF4-)2 (4), there
was no alkyl exchange after refluxing for several days. The
corresponding ethyl complex reaction with propene showed no alkyl
exchange either. This result rules out a reversible alkene pathway
as the source of H/D scrambling.
Figure 2. ORTEP diagram of 4. Phenyl rings on the phosphorus atoms
are not included. Selected bond distances (Å) and angles (deg) are as
follows: Ni(1)-C(5), 1.914(4); N(1)-C(5), 1.305(5); N(1)-C(1F), 1.458-
(5); C(5)-C(6), 1.500(5); C(5)-N(1)-C(1F), 130.2(3); N(1)-C(5)-Ni-
(1), 120.3(3); C(6)-C(5)-Ni(1),120.6(3); N(1)-C(5)-C(6), 119.1(3).
Upon addition of weak, noncoordinating bases such as 2,6-
lutidine to methylene chloride solutions of 2, the formation of nickel
hydride complex f was detected by 1H NMR showing the hydride
peak (dt) centered at -11.5 ppm, while IR showed ν(CN) for the
isocyanide ligand at 2129 cm-1. Deliberate formation of hydride
intermediate f greatly accelerates the rate of formation of hydro-
carbation product.
These results demonstrate a surprisingly ‘classical’ organome-
tallic mechanism for a decidedly “nonclassical” class of carbon-
carbon bond-forming “hydrocarbation” reactions.
Figure 3. ORTEP diagram of 5. Phenyl rings on the phosphorus atoms
are not included. Selected bond distances (Å) and angles (deg) are as
follows: Ni(1)-C(5), 1.908(6); N(1)-C(5), 1.318(8); N(1)-C(1F), 1.461-
(8); C(5)-C(6), 1.503(8); C(5)-N(1)-C(1F), 132.3(5); N(1)-C(5)-Ni-
(1), 120.0(4); C(6)-C(5)-Ni(1),120.7(4); N(1)-C(5)-C(6), 119.2(5).
Acknowledgment. We gratefully acknowledge the DOE
(DE-FG03-99ER14992) for support.
Supporting Information Available: Tables of crystallographic data
collection and refinement parameters, position and thermal parameters,
bond distances and angles for 3, 4, 5, and 7 (CIF). This material is
Scheme 3. Hydride Pathway of Hydrocarbation
References
(1) (a) Hegedus, L. S. Transition Metals in the Synthesis of Complex Organic
Molecules; University Science Books: Sausalito, California, 1999. (b)
Collman, J. P.; Hegedus, L. S.; Norton, J. R.; Finke, R. G. Principles and
Applications of Organotransition Metal Chemistry; University Science
Books: Sausalito, California, 1987.
(2) So¨derberg, Bjo¨rn C. G. Coord. Chem. ReV. 2002, 224, 171.
(3) (a) Ivin, J. J. Olefin Metathesis; Academic Press: New York, 1983. (b)
Anderson, R. B. The Fischer-Tropsch Synthesis; Academic Press: New
York, 1984. (c) Doyle, Michael P. In Catalytic Asymmetric Synthesis,
2nd ed.; Ojima, I, Ed.; Wiley-VCH: New York, 2000; p 191.
(4) Hou, H.; Gantzel, P. K.; Kubiak, C. P. Organometallics 2003, 22, 2817.
(5) Casey, C. P.; Fagan, P. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1982, 104, 4950.
(6) Casey, C. P.; Meszaros, M. W.; Fagan, P. J.; Bly, R. K.; Marder, S. R.;
Austin, E. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1986, 108, 4043.
(7) (a) Brown, H. C.; Ramachandran, P. V. Pure Appl. Chem. 1994, 66, 201.
(b) Beletskaya, I.; Pelter, A. Tetrahedron 1997, 53, 4957.
(8) (a)Wipf, P.; Takahashi, H.; Zhuang, N. Pure Appl. Chem. 1998, 70, 1077.
(b) Kalesse, M. Acros Org. Acta 1995, 1, 29.
pathways. This mechanism is briefly summarized here (Scheme
3). From the preparation of 2, one would expect very acidic protons
on both the carbene carbon and the nitrogen. The crystal structure
of 2 further indicates significant iminium formyl ground-state
character of 2.4 R-Hydrogen elimination is the microscopic reverse
of hydride insertion/imino formyl formation and would give the
(9) For crystal structure of complex 7, see Supporting Information.
(10) The reaction of 2 with d4-ethylene gives 60% [Ni(triphos)C(CD2CD2H)-
N(H)xylyl]2+(BF4
) -
and 40% [Ni(triphos)C(CDHCD3)N(H)xylyl]2+
-
(BF4-)2, while reacti2on of [Ni(triphos)C(D)N(D)xylyl]2+(CF3SO3-)2 with
ethylene gives 74% [Ni(triphos)(CH2CH2D)N(D)xylyl]2+(CF3SO3-)2 and
26% [Ni(triphos)(CHDCH3)N(D)xylyl]2+(CF3SO3-)2.
JA030108P
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 125, NO. 32, 2003 9565