key IMDA reaction. The reaction of 4 in xylene at reflux
afforded the exo adduct 3 with the desired configuration at
the ring junction (C9), as the sole DA product. The structure
of 3 was confirmed by 2D COSY, NOESY, and HSQC
experiments (Supporting Information). High exo selectivity
in IMDA reactions of related substrates has been previously
noted.14
In preparation for the introduction of the THF ring in the
final product, lactol 11 was treated with diiodosobenzene
diacetate/I2 following the conditions developed by Sua´rez
(Scheme 4).15 Although we had anticipated a mixture of
epimeric iodides 13a and 13b, we isolated the cyclic ether
12 directly as the major product in 63% yield. Iodide 13a
(21%) and a small amount of lactone 10 (11%) were also
obtained but there was no evidence for 13b. Lactone 10 was
inseparable from 12 and product separation was facilitated
by treatment of the mixture with K2CO3 in MeOH/CH2Cl2.
This reaction gave the tricylcic diol 14 and recovered lactone
10, which were easily separated. The overall yield of 14 from
11 was 62%. The structure of 14 was confirmed through
X-ray crystallography of the later derivative, 15 (vide infra,
Scheme 5). Iodide 13a was assigned from 2D COSY,
NOESY, and HSQC experiments (Supporting Information).
Scheme 4
The mechanism for the formation of THF 12 is at this
point unclear. It is possible that the reaction proceeds
through fragmentation of an initial alkoxy radical, thence a
mixture of 13a and 13b. The absence of 13b in the reaction
mixture could be an indication that this compound is
rapidly converted to 12 via an intramolecular displacement
pathway, whereas 13a is not. Although related radical
pathways to cyclic acetals have been reported, the analogous
transformation to cyclic ethers is unusual.15 Notwithstanding
the mechanistic underpinings, this reaction provides simul-
taenous entry to potential precursors to both the AB and A′B′
subunits of Angelmicin B, that is, THF 12 and iodide 13a,
respectively. In this vein, elaboration of 12 to a more
advanced precursor for the AB subunit was next investigated.
The IMDA product 3 appeared exquisitely suited for
elaboration to the desired target 2. Thus the convex topog-
raphy of 3 suggested that stereoselective dihydroxylation of
the alkene would facilitate the introduction of the C14,15
acyloin moiety, and oxidative fragmentation of the lactol
derived from 3 should pave the way for tetrahydrofuran
formation. Accordingly, treatment of 3 under standard
dihydroxylation conditions afforded a single triol diastere-
omer (Scheme 3), in which the stereoselectivity of the
dihydroxylation was deduced in a later derivative (cf 15,
Scheme 5). After selective protection of the secondary
Accordingly, 14, the aforementioned diol derivative of 12
was subjected to standard alcohol protecting group changes,
to give diol 15. Treatment of 15 with o-iodoxybenzoic acid
(IBX) in DMSO/PhF at 75 °C for 20 h according to the
Nicolaou procedure gave cyclohexanone 16 in 90% yield.16
In contrast to the reported reactivity of this reagent, a
prolonged reaction time, higher temperatures, or treatment
of 16 with IBX in a separate step, did not effect further
oxidation to the cyclohexenone 2. Eventually, using the
Sharpless-Reich protocol17 that was applied to a similar
intermediate in the Roush synthesis,5b 16 was converted to
Scheme 5
1
2 in 66% isolated yield (80% brsm). The H and 13C NMR
data for 2 was very similar to the data for the Roush
derivative, which was different with respect to the alcohol
protecting groups.
(13) Mori, M.; Sakaibara, N.; Kinoshita, A. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63,
6082-6083.
(14) Chu-Moyer, M. Y.; Danishefsky, S. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992,
114, 8333-8334.
(15) (a) Freire, R.; Marrero, J. J.; Rodriguez, M. S.; Sua´rez, E.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1986, 27, 383-385. (b) Bentancor, C.; Freire, R.; Pe´rez-
Martin, I.; Prange´, T.; Sua´rez, E. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 1295-1297. (c)
Bentancor, C.; Freire, R.; Pe´rez-Martin, I.; Prange´, T.; Sua´rez, E. Tetra-
hedron 2005, 61, 2803-2814.
(16) (a) Nicolaou, K. C.; Zhong, Y.-L.; Baran, P. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2000, 122, 7596-7597. (b) Nicolaou, K. C.; Montagnon, T.; Baran, P. S.;
Zhong, Y.-L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 2245-2258. (c) Kaliappan, K.
P.; Ravikumar, V. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 2417-2419.
(17) (a) Sharpless, K. B.; Lauer, R. F.; Teranishi, A. Y. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1973, 95, 6137. (b) Reich, H. J.; Renga, J. M.; Reich, I. L. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1975, 97, 5434. (c) Danishefsky, S.; Vaughan, K.; Gadwood,
R.; Tsuzuki, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1981, 103, 4136.
alcohol as the triethylsilyl ether, the resulting lactone 10 was
treated with DIBAL-H to give lactol 11 in 90% yield from
3. The overall yield of the highly substituted decalin 11 from
enyne diol 5 was 53% based on recovered 5 (31% isolated).
(12) (a) Reetz, M. T. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1984, 23, 556-569.
(b) Boyer, F.-D.; Hanna, I.; Richard. L. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 3095-3098.
Org. Lett., Vol. 10, No. 7, 2008
1339