Improved Morphology and
Crystalline Quality of MBE CdZnTe/Si
609
Fig. 2. Flake-defect density of 25 CdTe/Si epilayers as a function of
growth rate.
Fig. 1. Scanning electron micrograph of defects typical of those
observed at the surface of a CdTe epilayer on a Si substrate.
to cause higher flake-defect densities. Data from
growth set 2 showed elevated densities of flake de-
fects. These higher densities were attributed to a
single event of inadvertent over-heating of the CdTe
source. During growth set 3, special care was taken to
avoid over-heating of the CdTe source material, and
lower growth rates were employed throughout the
growthset.Thesemeasuressuccessfullyreducedflake-
defect densities to ~150/3-inch wafer. The addition of
the relatively small ZnTe fluxes necessary to deposit
Cd1–yZnyTe epilayers with 0.02 < y < 0.04 did not
significantly affect the formation of flake defects.
Crystalline quality was significantly improved by
cyclic thermal annealing during the growth process.
Because of the high temperatures (~380∞C) involved
in this process, Te2 overpressure (~ 2 ¥ 10–6 mbar) was
utilized to maintain smooth surface morphology and
to suppress formation of thermal pit defects. The use
of thermal annealing reduced typical etch pit density
(EPD) values from 1–3 ¥ 107 cm–2 to current values of
2–8¥ 106 cm–2 forepilayersthickerthan12mm.Figure
3 compares EPD values for annealed and unannealed
epilayers as a function of epilayer thickness. Our
lowest observed EPD was 8.0 ¥ 105 cm–2 for a 20 mm
thick CdTe epilayer. Thermal annealing also im-
proved x-ray diffraction full width at half maximum
(FWHM) values, although there was no direct corre-
lation between FWHM and EPD values. Typical
FWHM values were about 100 arcsec for annealed
epilayers. The lowest FWHM value was 71 arcsec for
a 15 mm thick CdTe epilayer. Cd1–yZnyTe epilayers
with 0.02 < y < 0.04 typically exhibited larger FWHM
values (~150 arcsec) and higher EPDs (~2 ¥ 107 cm–2)
than epilayers not containing Zn, when grown under
similar conditions.
densities (~105–107 cm–2) of faceted surface defects.
Figure 1 is a scanning electron micrograph of several
such defects. The density of these defects was dra-
matically reduced by increased CdTe flux and by
decreased growth temperature. Based on this obser-
vation as well as electron microscopy imagery, we
hypothesized that these surface defects were thermal
pitsformedbyexcessiveevaporationfromtheCdZnTe
surface at elevated temperatures. Optimization of
growth rate and/or growth temperature led to typical
defect densities of less than 200 cm–2. It was found
that at growth rates of ~1 mm/hour, a substrate
temperature of less than ~ 290∞C was required to
maintain good surface morphology. To prevent the
formation of these defects during periods of cyclic
annealing, a Te overpressure was used. The addition
of ZnTe flux to deposit Cd1–yZnyTe epilayers with 0.02
< y < 0.04 did not significantly affect the density or
appearance of surface defects.
During the aforementioned investigation, it was
found that excessive CdTe fluxes led to the formation
of “flake” defects. These defects were typically large
(5–50 mm) and irregularly shaped. Their density was
a function of CdTe source temperature and CdTe
source heating schedule history. Higher CdTe source
temperatures ledtohigherdensitiesofflakedefectsand
the occurrence of very large flake-defects (>100 mm).
Excessive heating of the CdTe source for prolonged
periods tended to irreversibly cause flake defect for-
mation in subsequent epilayers even if CdTe flux was
reduced. Figure 2 demonstrates flake-defect forma-
tion as a function of growth rate. Data for Fig. 2 was
taken from 25 CdTe/Si epilayers. One quarter of the
3-inch wafer was cleaved and visually inspected for
flakes. Only flakes visible to the unaided eye were
counted(>2–3mm).Thedatawereclassifiedbygrowth
sets, defined as sets of consecutive growth runs unin-
terruptedbychamberventingandreplenishingofthe
CdTe source material. From Fig. 2 it can be seen that
higher growth rates (i.e., greater CdTe fluxes) tended
The reproducibility of our current process is exhib-
ited by the histogram of Fig. 4, which represents the
FWHM values of 20 consecutively grown CdTe/Si
epilayers. All epilayers were grown under similar
conditions for 15 hours at growth rates ~1 mm/hour.
TheaverageFWHMvalueofallepilayerswas99arcsec
with a standard deviation of 17 arcsec. Nineteen of the