C.Sun et al./ Bioorg.Med.Chem.Lett.12 (2002) 2213–2215
2215
Acknowledgements
This work was supported in part by grants from the
NIH NIAID-AI47127, California Cancer Research
Program (00–00757V-20012) and the Skaggs Institute
for Chemical Biology.
References and Notes
Scheme 4. (a) Isobutylchloroformate, TEA, THF;(b) 50% TFA,
CH2Cl2;(c) HBTU, NMM, DMF.
1. Trail, P. A.;Bianchi, A. B. Curr.Opin.Immunol. 1999, 11,
584.
2. (a) Chari, R. V. J. Adv.Drug Delivery Rev. 1998, 31, 89. (b)
Funaro, A.;Horenstein, A. L.;Santoro, P.;Cinti, C.;Gre-
gorini, A.;Malavasi, F. Biotechnol.Adv. 2000, 18, 385. (c)
Senter, P. D.;Springer, C. J. Adv.Drug Delivery Rev. 2001, 53,
247. (d) Denny, W. A. Eur.J.Med.Chem. 2001, 36, 577.
3. (a) Yokota, T.;Milenic, D. E.;Whitlow, M.;Schlom, J.
Cancer Res. 1992, 52, 3402. (b) Adams, G. P.;McCartney,
J. E.;Tai, M. S.;Oppermann, H.;Huston, J. S.;Stafford,
W. F.;Bookman, M. A.;Fand, I.;Houston, L. L.;Weiner,
L. M. Cancer Res. 1993, 53, 4026.
4. Mao, S. L.;Gao, C. S.;Lo, C. H. L.;Wirsching, P.;Wong,
C. H.;Janda, K. D. P. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1999, 96, 6953.
5. King, H. D.;Yurgaitis, D.;Willner, D.;Firestone, R. A.;
Yang, M. B.;Lasch, S. J.;Hellstrom, K. E.;Trail, P. A. Bio-
conjugate Chem. 1999, 10, 279.
Scheme 5. (a) HBTU, NMM, DMF;(b) 50% TFA, CH 2Cl2;(c)
NHSMP, NMM, CH2Cl2;(d) MPA, HBTU, NMM, DMF.
6. Esfand, R.;Tomalia, D. A. Drug Discov.Today 2001, 6, 427.
7. Roberts, J. C.;Adams, Y. E.;Tomalia, D.;Mercer-Smith,
J. A.;Lavallee, D. K. Bioconjugate Chem. 1990, 1, 305.
8. Early publications include: (a) Ghose, T.;Nigam, S. P.
Cancer 1972, 29, 1398. (b) Ghose, T.;Norvell, S. T.;Bodurtha,
using the active ester NHSMP were not successful. The
reaction proceeded slowly and decomposition of the
maleimide group was detected after 5 h. We surmized
the increased steric hindrance around the amino group
was the problem. Thus, we employed the more potent
activating agent HBTU to couple 8 with 3-mal-
eimidopropionic acid (MPA) and obtained the final
fully functionalized compound M-G2-CBL9 in 85%
yield (Scheme 5).
A.;Cameron, D.;Macdonal, A. S.;Guclu, A.
Brit.Med.J.
1972, 3, 495. (c) Cook, J. L. C.;Badgett, W. J. L.;Schulz, H.;
Winkler, U.;Staak, J. O.;Engert, A. Brit.Med.J. 1972, 4, 52.
For a recent review, see: Shulz, H.;Winkler, U.;Staak, J. O.;
Engert, A.; Onkologie 2000, 23, 526.
9. Beyer, U.;Roth, T.;Schumacher, P.;Maier, G.;Unold, A.;
J.Med.
Frahm, A. W.;Fiebig, H. H.;Unger, C.;Kratz, F.
Chem. 1998, 41, 2701.
10. Smyth, M. J.;Pietersz, G. A.;Classon, B. J.;Mckenzie,
I. F. C. J.Natl.Cancer Inst. 1986, 76, 503.
In conclusion, we have synthesized three molecules
containing one, three and nine chlorambucil residues
at one terminus and a maleimide moiety on the
other. M-G1-CBL3 and M-G2-CBL9 take advantage of
a dendritic display to carry multiple drug molecules.
Site-specific attachment of these compounds to our
recently prepared scFvs will allow studying the rela-
tionship between the molar ratio of drug/antibody and
the potency of antibody–drug immunoconjugates and
will be reported in due course.
11. (a) Newkome, G. R.;Lin, X. F.;Young, J. K. Synlett
1992, 1, 53. (b) Nierengarten, J. F.;Habicher, T.;Kessinger,
R.;Cardullo, F.;Diederich, F.;Gramlich, V.;Gisselbrecht,
J. P.;Boudon, C.;Gross, M. Helv.Chim.Acta. 1997, 80, 2238.
12. (a) Satoh, T.;Suzuki, S.;Suzuki, Y.;Miyaji, Y.;Imai, Z.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1969, 52, 4555. (b) Buhleier, E.;Wehner,
W.;Vogtle, F. Synthesis 1978, 10, 155.
13. Tomalia, D. A. Macromol.Symp. 1996, 101, 243.
´
14. Hawker, C. J.;Fre chet, J. M. J. J.Am.Chem.Soc. 1990,
112, 7638.